Can you please start writing with these on the top by double spacing?
AIH2102 Varieties of History: The Crusades
Tutor: Dr. Katherine Lewis
Name: Tamas Zelei
Essay Title: Why did Islamic forces win the second crusade?
Can you please use primary sources (3) and secondary sources which are books (6 of them)
Here’s my booklist which should include in my assignment:
Books recommended for purchase
Christopher Tyerman, God’s War: A New History of the Crusades (2007 for the paperback edition) a detailed account of events, invaluable background information and interpretive issues for both seminars and written work
Jonathan Phillips, Holy Warriors: A Modern History of the Crusades (2010 for the paperback edition) a briefer account and a more approachable introduction than Tyerman. It places more of an emphasis on thematic and conceptual issues, and includes some insightful discussion of post-medieval perceptions and appropriations of the Crusades
A 3 part BBC TV series on the Crusades presented by leading crusades historian Thomas Asbridge is available on Unitube and is well worth watching. See Unilearn for direct links to the episodes in the External Links folder.
Christopher Tyerman, The Debate on the Crusades (2011) is an excellent guide to later medieval and post-medieval discussions of the crusades, including an account of modern historiographical developments which will be very useful for essays.
Generally useful ebooks (these are also available in hard copies in the library) Ebooks are highlighted in bold throughout this handbook.
Christopher Tyerman, The Crusades: A Very Short Introduction (2005) (a very nice introduction to the topic, as the title suggests!) This was originally published as Fighting for Christendom: Holy War and the Crusades (2004) which we also have via Summon.
The following 2 books will have some relevant material for all the topics that we’ll cover and are excellent starting points for events, biographies of individuals, authors, etc.
Peter Lock, The Routledge Companion to the Crusades (2006) (contains a very useful narrative outline of events, biographies of key figures and thematic discussion)
Alan V. Murray, The Crusades: An Encyclopedia 3 volumes (2006) (as its title suggests, alphabetical entries covering a huge range of topics, events and individuals – browse the list of entries at the beginning of the book for seminar preparation and essays).
Other books on the Crusades
Here follows a list of other general books on the Crusades which can be found in the library. These will generally not be listed in each week’s reading, but do have useful surveys of events and issues. Note that the approaches and findings of the older studies here have been modified and often challenged by more recent scholarship. This doesn’t mean that they aren’t worth reading but you do need to be aware of how scholarship has moved on since they were written. Especially as there has been a lot of new work produced in the last decade in particular.
Steven Runciman, A History of the Crusades in three volumes
Vol I: The First Crusade and the Foundation of the Kingdom of Jerusalem (1951)
Vol II: The Kingdom of Jerusalem and the Frankish East (1952
Vol III: Acre and the Later Crusades (1954)
Runciman produced the first survey of the Crusades in English and this is now considered a classic account. His work has been extremely influential – note that these books have been republished many times since the 1950s, so we have copies of volume 1 in the library published at different dates, but the text is the same so it doesn’t matter which one you use!
Kenneth M. Setton, A History of the Crusades in 6 volumes (1969) – vols 1&2 are in the library, all 6 volumes can be accessed online, see the link on Unilearn.
R.C. Smail, Crusading Warfare 1097-1193 (1956)
Thomas Sherrer Ross, Kingdoms and Strongholds of the Crusaders (1971)
Hans Eberhard Mayer, The Crusades (1972; second edition 1988)
R.C. Smail, The Crusaders in Syria and the Holy Land (1973)
H.E.J. Cowdrey, Popes, Monks and Crusaders (1984)
Jean Richard, The Crusades c. 1071- c. 1291 (1999)
Carole Hillenbrand, The Crusades: Islamic Perceptions (1999)
Adrian J. Boas, Crusader Archaeology: The Material Culture of the Near East (1999) (ebook)
Mike Paine, The Crusades (2001) (ebook. This is a brief introduction to events and issues)
Amin Maalouf, The Crusades Through Arab Eyes (2001)
Jonathan Riley-Smith, ed. The Oxford History of the Crusades (2002) (ebook, a collection of essays by a range of historians, also available in illustrated form as
Jonathan Riley-Smith, The Oxford Illustrated History of the Crusades)
This has exactly the same contents, but with illustrations (both contemporary images and photographs of crusader sites)
Jonathan P. Phillips, The Crusades 1095-1197 (2002)
Marcus Bull and Norman Housley, eds, The Experience of Crusading. Volume I: Western Approaches (2003)
P.W. Edbury and Jonathan Phillips, eds, The Experience of Crusading. Volume II: Defining the Crusader Kingdom (2003) two very useful collections of essays, again, worth browsing as not all of the contents are listed in this pack
Jonathan Riley-Smith, The First Crusade and the Idea of Crusading (2003) (ebook)
Helen J. Nicholson, Medieval Warfare Theory and the Practice of Warfare in Europe, 300-1500 (2004) (ebook, a very useful discussion of the Crusades within the wider medieval context)
Helen J. Nicholson, ed., Palgrave Advances in the Crusades (2005) (ebook, rather than a survey of events, this is a thematic study of differing approaches which historians have taken to the crusades and provides some invaluable historiographical discussion).
Jonathan Harris, Byzantium and the Crusades (2006)
About the style:
History at Huddersfield: Style Sheet
You should always employ the Oxford System for all forms of History coursework: references are indicated by a number in the text (placed after punctuation, as at the end of this sentence) and a correspondingly numbered footnote at the foot of the page or endnote at the end of the essay.1 To place a footnote number like this2, for example, is incorrect. Use your word-processing programme for referencing. If you need help, ask.
References should be used for:
direct quotations. Short quotations (one or two sentences) are incorporated into the text of the essay but indicated by single quotation marks. Longer quotations are set off in single spacing indented from the left-hand margin.
Mention of a particular theory, fact, argument of viewpoint (attributable to a specific person, that is not common knowledge)
Statistics, examples and case studies
Paraphrase of any of the above.
For full details about referencing see ‘History at Huddersfield Style Guide for Referencing’ available on Unilearn
This is how your references should appear in your footnotes.
1 Christopher Hill, The World Turned Upside Down: Radical Ideas During the English Revolution (London, 1975), p. 163.
2 Roger Howard, ‘Britain, Persia and petroleum’, History Today, 58, 5, (2008), pp. 44-53.
3 Alcuin Blamires, ‘The twin demons of aristocratic society in Sir Gowther’ in N. McDonald (ed.), Pulp Fictions of Medieval England: Essays in Popular Romance (Manchester, 2004), pp. 54-55.
4 David Cody, ‘Child Labor’, The Victorian Web, <http://landow.stg.brown.edu/victorian/history/hist8.html>, [Accessed 12 May 2008].
5 Lawrence of Arabia (1962). [Film]
Subsequent references to a text are given via a short title as follows.
6 Hill, The World Turned Upside Down, p. 168.
7 Howard, ‘Britain, Persia and Petroleum’, pp. 45-6.
8 Blamires, ‘The twin demons of aristocratic society’, p. 55.
9 Cody, ‘Child Labor’.
10 Lawrence of Arabia.
Avoid Latin abbreviations (op. cit., et al). The one exception is ibid. = ibidem, which you may use if you are confident that you can use it correctly – see the full style guide on Unilearn.
This is how references should appear in your bibliography.
List primary and secondary sources separately.
PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT 🙂
Compelling correspondence is essential to the achievement all things considered but since of the changing idea of the present working environments, successful correspondence turns out to be more troublesome, and because of the numerous impediments that will permit beneficiaries to acknowledge the plan of the sender It is restricted. Misguided judgments.In spite of the fact that correspondence inside the association is rarely completely open, numerous straightforward arrangements can be executed to advance the effect of these hindrances.
Concerning specific contextual analysis, two significant correspondence standards, correspondence channel determination and commotion are self-evident. This course presents the standards of correspondence, the act of general correspondence, and different speculations to all the more likely comprehend the correspondence exchanges experienced in regular daily existence. The standards and practices that you learn in this course give the premise to additionally learning and correspondence.
This course starts with an outline of the correspondence cycle, the method of reasoning and hypothesis. In resulting modules of the course, we will look at explicit use of relational connections in close to home and expert life. These incorporate relational correspondence, bunch correspondence and dynamic, authoritative correspondence in the work environment or relational correspondence. Rule of Business Communication In request to make correspondence viable, it is important to follow a few rules and standards. Seven of them are fundamental and applicable, and these are clear, finished, brief, obliging, right, thought to be, concrete. These standards are frequently called 7C for business correspondence. The subtleties of these correspondence standards are examined underneath: Politeness Principle: When conveying, we should build up a cordial relationship with every individual who sends data to us.
To be inviting and polite is indistinguishable, and politeness requires an insightful and amicable activity against others. Axioms are notable that gracious “pay of graciousness is the main thing to win everything”. Correspondence staff ought to consistently remember this. The accompanying standards may assist with improving courtesy:Preliminary considering correspondence with family All glad families have the mystery of progress. This achievement originates from a strong establishment of closeness and closeness. Indeed, through private correspondence these cozy family connections become all the more intently. Correspondence is the foundation of different affiliations, building solid partners of obedient devotion, improving family way of life, and assisting with accomplishing satisfaction (Gosche, p. 1). In any case, so as to keep up an amicable relationship, a few families experienced tumultuous encounters. Correspondence in the family is an intricate and alluring marvel. Correspondence between families isn’t restricted to single messages between families or verbal correspondence.
It is a unique cycle that oversees force, closeness and limits, cohesiveness and flexibility of route frameworks, and makes pictures, topics, stories, ceremonies, rules, jobs, making implications, making a feeling of family life An intelligent cycle that makes a model. This model has passed ages. Notwithstanding the view as a family and family automatic framework, one of the greatest exploration establishments in between family correspondence centers around a family correspondence model. Family correspondence model (FCP) hypothesis clarifies why families impart in their own specific manner dependent on one another ‘s psychological direction. Early FCP research established in media research is keen on how families handle broad communications data. Family correspondence was perceived as an exceptional scholastic exploration field by the National Communications Association in 1989. Family correspondence researchers were at first impacted by family research, social brain science, and relational hypothesis, before long built up the hypothesis and began research in a family framework zeroed in on a significant job. Until 2001, the primary issue of the Family Communication Research Journal, Family Communication Magazine, was given. Family correspondence is more than the field of correspondence analysts in the family. Examination on family correspondence is normally done by individuals in brain science, humanism, and family research, to give some examples models. However, as the popular family correspondence researcher Leslie Baxter stated, it is the focal point of this intelligent semantic creation measure making the grant of family correspondence special. In the field of in-home correspondence, correspondence is normally not founded on autonomous messages from one sender to one beneficiary, yet dependent on the dynamic interdependency of data shared among families It is conceptualized. The focal point of this methodology is on the shared trait of semantic development inside family frameworks. As such, producing doesn’t happen in vacuum, however it happens in a wide scope of ages and social exchange.
Standards are rules end up being followed when performing work to agree to a given objective. Hierarchical achievement relies significantly upon compelling correspondence. So as to successfully impart, it is important to follow a few standards and rules. Coming up next are rules to guarantee powerful correspondence: clearness: lucidity of data is a significant guideline of correspondence. For beneficiaries to know the message plainly, the messages ought to be sorted out in a basic language. To guarantee that beneficiaries can without much of a stretch comprehend the importance of the message, the sender needs to impart unmistakably and unhesitatingly so the beneficiary can plainly and unquestionably comprehend the data.>