Your Schacter et. al. Psychology textbook discusses how we think about evidence (Chapter 2, section 4). When you are making an important, complicated decision, what type of information do you consider reliable? If you disagree with a friend on a critical point, do you fairly consider different perspectives? Are you objective or do you see what you expect and want to see? Identify and briefly discuss a situation in you have experienced in which you did not critically think about the evidence. Integrate one of the concepts from this section of your textbook. Be sure to upload the Six Principles of Scientific Research in order to choose a topic and understand what principle applies to your story.
Formatting instructions
Turn in your paper through the Canvas website for your intro Psychology course
Papers will be checked for plagiarism
2/3 - 1 page in length
Text must be double spaced
Typed in 12 point “Times New Roman” font
IOM Future of Nursing Report & Nursing
- Robert Wood Foundation Committee Work & IOM Report 16.5 pts
- Key Messages Transforming Nursing 24.75 pts
- State-Based Action Coalitions and their Help in Advancing Goals form IOM Report 24.75 pts
- State Action Coalition Initiatives Advancing Nursing Profession 33pts
- Barriers to Advancement 33 pts
- Thesis Development & Purpose 8.25 pts
- Argument Logic & Construction 8.25 pts
- Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use
8.25 pts