Taking Sides: Were the 1920's an era of social and cultural rebellion

Taking Sides: Were the 1920’s an era of social and cultural rebellion

Project description
Read pages 203-206 in the book: (Taking Sides clashing views in United States History volume 2 Fifteenth edition)
Pick one of the historians that you want to represent, and write taking on their persona as if you were them on a panel of historians. the first half of the paper summarize your argument the next half of the paper should be a point by point attack on the other historians argument and why it is flawed compared to yours.

Issue 9 Assignment Sheet:   Were the 1920s an Era of Social and Cultural Rebellion?
You are going to be taking on the persona of a historian in this paper. For our purposes, we are going to pretend we are at the annual meeting of the American Historical Association on a panel discussion concerning the 1920s. You will represent one of the two historical points of view and you will argue with the other “historian” that your ideas are better than the other viewpoint.
Step by step guide for this paper:
1.   Read the entire assignment (Issue 9 in the Taking Sides Book, pages 203-226) so you know what is expected of you as you read through everything
2.   Pick one of the historians (either Ostrander or Shannon) that you want to represent. The other will be your opponent.
The Assignment:
Your paper will be a way to prepare you for taking on your role as the historian that you are representing. In this paper, you should do two things. First, summarize the argument of your particular author in one or two paragraphs. This should be concise—you are going to be using this to briefly state your position. Be clear about exactly how your historian would answer the central question of this reading: Were the 1920s an Era of Social and Cultural Rebellion?
The second part of your paper should be a point by point attack against the other historian’s argument. Thus, you need to fully understand how each historian is creating their argument. For instance, if you chose to be Shannon, then the second section of your paper will be an attempt to prove that the other author, Ostrander, provides an understanding of the time period that is not as complete or not “correct.” In a sense, since you are taking on the identity of Shannon, you are going to be challenging the other author with your (meaning Shannon’s) own ideas. You NEED TO SHOW that you can identify the other historian’s argument and use your own ideas to counter her ideas. This should be roughly a page long and not only showcase that you have understood the other readings’ argument but that you can connect your historian’s argument with it.

Technical Requirements: ***IMPORTANT***
All papers should be double spaced using Times New Roman 12 point font with 1” margins all around. MS Word defaults to 1.25” so you have to make sure to go in and change the margins. Papers must be between 1 and 2 pages in length.
When you start the paper, you will need a header. For a header, put your name and the date the paper is due, single spaced, in the upper left hand corner. Then, press “enter” twice and start your paper, double spaced, there. What this does is prevent the half-page headers and titles. Your paper should also be stapled. Any deviation from these instructions will result in a TWO point deduction from your paper grade

Grading Guidelines:
What I am essentially looking for in these papers is your ability to clearly and concisely extract the author’s main argument from the reading. For this paper, 50% of your grade is based on part one of the paper. The other 50% is based on part two. In that section, I am looking for you to display an understanding of the other reading and how that author’s argument intersects with your author’s. This takes a lot of thought on your part—it isn’t a memorization game. You need to figure out what each author is arguing and then really think about how those arguments, on the same event, are similar or different. An “A” paper will clearly display knowledge of each author’s argument and how the author’s arguments relate to each other, showing how one diverges from the other or acts in tandem in certain regards.

Information on Citations/Works Cited:
If you are talking about a generally known historical fact, something like “World War II ended in 1945” you do not need to provide a citation for that since it is general common knowledge. That does not mean that you can copy directly word for word from a textbook or internet site about World War II. You need to talk about these commonly known historical facts in your own words.

If you want to use a specific idea from one of our sources, let’s say an author’s interpretation of how notions of race were created, that is not common knowledge, the author brought this stuff to light through historical investigation and published it. You need to give him or her credit for that idea. You give credit by providing a citation after the quote or at the end of the paragraph (if you are not using a direct quote) by putting (Author last name 132). That shows me that I can find that idea on page one hundred and thirty-two. You should NOT use any outside sources for this paper other than those we read. You also do NOT need a works cited page.
IMPORTANT: For this paper, you must cite every direct quote (those that you pull directly for another source) with a citation (Author 132) right after the end of the sentence where the quote is. If you are using the ideas without a direct quote and aren’t directly using the author’s words, you MUST put a citation at the END of the paragraph. EVERYTHING NEEDS TO BE CITED! It does not matter if you aren’t using exactly what they said: if you benefited from reading some source in writing a particular paragraph, you have to cite it at the end of the paragraph.

PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT 🙂

Compelling correspondence is essential to the achievement all things considered but since of the changing idea of the present working environments, successful correspondence turns out to be more troublesome, and because of the numerous impediments that will permit beneficiaries to acknowledge the plan of the sender It is restricted. Misguided judgments.In spite of the fact that correspondence inside the association is rarely completely open, numerous straightforward arrangements can be executed to advance the effect of these hindrances.

Concerning specific contextual analysis, two significant correspondence standards, correspondence channel determination and commotion are self-evident. This course presents the standards of correspondence, the act of general correspondence, and different speculations to all the more likely comprehend the correspondence exchanges experienced in regular daily existence. The standards and practices that you learn in this course give the premise to additionally learning and correspondence.

This question has been answered

This course starts with an outline of the correspondence cycle, the method of reasoning and hypothesis. In resulting modules of the course, we will look at explicit use of relational connections in close to home and expert life. These incorporate relational correspondence, bunch correspondence and dynamic, authoritative correspondence in the work environment or relational correspondence. Rule of Business Communication In request to make correspondence viable, it is important to follow a few rules and standards. Seven of them are fundamental and applicable, and these are clear, finished, brief, obliging, right, thought to be, concrete. These standards are frequently called 7C for business correspondence. The subtleties of these correspondence standards are examined underneath: Politeness Principle: When conveying, we should build up a cordial relationship with every individual who sends data to us.

To be inviting and polite is indistinguishable, and politeness requires an insightful and amicable activity against others. Axioms are notable that gracious “pay of graciousness is the main thing to win everything”. Correspondence staff ought to consistently remember this. The accompanying standards may assist with improving courtesy:Preliminary considering correspondence with family All glad families have the mystery of progress. This achievement originates from a strong establishment of closeness and closeness. Indeed, through private correspondence these cozy family connections become all the more intently. Correspondence is the foundation of different affiliations, building solid partners of obedient devotion, improving family way of life, and assisting with accomplishing satisfaction (Gosche, p. 1). In any case, so as to keep up an amicable relationship, a few families experienced tumultuous encounters. Correspondence in the family is an intricate and alluring marvel. Correspondence between families isn’t restricted to single messages between families or verbal correspondence.

It is a unique cycle that oversees force, closeness and limits, cohesiveness and flexibility of route frameworks, and makes pictures, topics, stories, ceremonies, rules, jobs, making implications, making a feeling of family life An intelligent cycle that makes a model. This model has passed ages. Notwithstanding the view as a family and family automatic framework, one of the greatest exploration establishments in between family correspondence centers around a family correspondence model. Family correspondence model (FCP) hypothesis clarifies why families impart in their own specific manner dependent on one another ‘s psychological direction. Early FCP research established in media research is keen on how families handle broad communications data. Family correspondence was perceived as an exceptional scholastic exploration field by the National Communications Association in 1989. Family correspondence researchers were at first impacted by family research, social brain science, and relational hypothesis, before long built up the hypothesis and began research in a family framework zeroed in on a significant job. Until 2001, the primary issue of the Family Communication Research Journal, Family Communication Magazine, was given. Family correspondence is more than the field of correspondence analysts in the family. Examination on family correspondence is normally done by individuals in brain science, humanism, and family research, to give some examples models. However, as the popular family correspondence researcher Leslie Baxter stated, it is the focal point of this intelligent semantic creation measure making the grant of family correspondence special. In the field of in-home correspondence, correspondence is normally not founded on autonomous messages from one sender to one beneficiary, yet dependent on the dynamic interdependency of data shared among families It is conceptualized. The focal point of this methodology is on the shared trait of semantic development inside family frameworks. As such, producing doesn’t happen in vacuum, however it happens in a wide scope of ages and social exchange.

Standards are rules end up being followed when performing work to agree to a given objective. Hierarchical achievement relies significantly upon compelling correspondence. So as to successfully impart, it is important to follow a few standards and rules. Coming up next are rules to guarantee powerful correspondence: clearness: lucidity of data is a significant guideline of correspondence. For beneficiaries to know the message plainly, the messages ought to be sorted out in a basic language. To guarantee that beneficiaries can without much of a stretch comprehend the importance of the message, the sender needs to impart unmistakably and unhesitatingly so the beneficiary can plainly and unquestionably comprehend the data.>

Taking Sides: Were the 1920's an era of social and cultural rebellion

Sample Answer

Our Services

Secure Checkout

Our Advantages