Assessment 1 – Social and Lifespan Developmental Psychology – social paper
• Refer to the module descriptor sheet on NOW for the module’s learning outcomes.
• You should keep an electronic copy of all your written pieces of work as you may be required at any stage before graduation to submit the work for testing through plagiarism detection systems.
• Use only your student number in the document that you submit (include it as a header or footer) – do not put your name in the document.
• If this is an undergraduate written assignment, include as an appendix all past feedback that you have received on this type of assignment at NTU (i.e. if this is an essay assignment, include an appendix with all the feedback you have had on previous essays; if this is a practical report, include all the feedback you have had on previous reports). If relevant, there will be a proforma attached to the end of this document, which you can copy and edit to include as an appendix to your assessed work. This feedback will NOT be taken into account when the grading is done – it will only be viewed after the provisional grade has been assigned.
Assessment 1 – Social and Lifespan Developmental Psychology – social paper
Assessment: 2,500 (excluding references) word essay.
The students are required to answer 2 questions from a list of 5 questions. The 5 questions are as follows:
1. To persuade others, we should target their emotions. Discuss with reference to psychological evidence.
2. To what extent does the psychological evidence support the claim that individuals will blindly conform or obey commands from an authority figure, even when this involves inflicting harm on others?
3. The ‘self’ functions at both an individual and group level. Discuss social psychological findings which account for this.
4. Aggression is an innate response in humans. Discuss using evidence from social and biological accounts.
5. ‘Our actions are determined by our attitudes’. Discuss with reference to psychological theory and research evidence.
Students should submit the assessment as a single word processed document comprising of the answers to two questions and one references section.
During the lectures, key elements of the essay will be addressed and students will have the opportunity to ask questions about what is expected of them. If you have any queries regarding this assessment, please direct them to Maria Kontogianni.
Assessment criteria
The criteria we will use to mark/grade your work, made clear to you in advance:
The standard NTU Psychology undergraduate grading scheme will be used as the marking criteria for this work (NQF-5, NTU Grading Scheme).
Feedback
Each student will receive prompt and individualised, written feedback and a grade relative to the quality of their essay, along with suggestions tailored toward the improvement of their critical evaluation and writing skills (see above for date of return of feedback and grade). Students should use these pieces of feedback, in conjunction with previous relevant feedback that they have received to improve their general academic skills. Students are asked to contact Maria Kontogianni if there is anything in their feedback that they do not understand.
How we make sure that marking/grading is fair
To ensure fairness, all assessed work is marked with reference to marking criteria and with reference to the NTU grading scheme. Furthermore, all marking of assessed work is moderated by another internal marker in line with university policy. All year 2, year 3 and postgraduate work is further sampled by external examiners. Moderation procedures will not have been completed by the time the work is returned to you. For that reason ALL grades must be regarded as provisional until ratified by the Board of Examiners.
Feedback appendix proforma
For written assignments only, copy and paste the feedback from all relevant pieces of assessed work into this proforma, in reverse chronological order, and include this as an appendix. Include only the main elements of the feedback which told you what the strengths of the piece of work were, and what you need to work on. Do not include detailed in-text or numbered comments.
Simply duplicate the ‘assignment title’ and ‘feedback’ sections below for as many pieces of feedback as you are including.
Appendix
Assignment title:
[copy and paste the assignment title in here]
Feedback:
[copy and paste the main elements of the feedback you received for that assignment here – duplicate the ‘assignment title’ and ‘feedback’ sections as many times as necessary]
PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT 🙂
Compelling correspondence is essential to the achievement all things considered but since of the changing idea of the present working environments, successful correspondence turns out to be more troublesome, and because of the numerous impediments that will permit beneficiaries to acknowledge the plan of the sender It is restricted. Misguided judgments.In spite of the fact that correspondence inside the association is rarely completely open, numerous straightforward arrangements can be executed to advance the effect of these hindrances.
Concerning specific contextual analysis, two significant correspondence standards, correspondence channel determination and commotion are self-evident. This course presents the standards of correspondence, the act of general correspondence, and different speculations to all the more likely comprehend the correspondence exchanges experienced in regular daily existence. The standards and practices that you learn in this course give the premise to additionally learning and correspondence.
This course starts with an outline of the correspondence cycle, the method of reasoning and hypothesis. In resulting modules of the course, we will look at explicit use of relational connections in close to home and expert life. These incorporate relational correspondence, bunch correspondence and dynamic, authoritative correspondence in the work environment or relational correspondence. Rule of Business Communication In request to make correspondence viable, it is important to follow a few rules and standards. Seven of them are fundamental and applicable, and these are clear, finished, brief, obliging, right, thought to be, concrete. These standards are frequently called 7C for business correspondence. The subtleties of these correspondence standards are examined underneath: Politeness Principle: When conveying, we should build up a cordial relationship with every individual who sends data to us.
To be inviting and polite is indistinguishable, and politeness requires an insightful and amicable activity against others. Axioms are notable that gracious “pay of graciousness is the main thing to win everything”. Correspondence staff ought to consistently remember this. The accompanying standards may assist with improving courtesy:Preliminary considering correspondence with family All glad families have the mystery of progress. This achievement originates from a strong establishment of closeness and closeness. Indeed, through private correspondence these cozy family connections become all the more intently. Correspondence is the foundation of different affiliations, building solid partners of obedient devotion, improving family way of life, and assisting with accomplishing satisfaction (Gosche, p. 1). In any case, so as to keep up an amicable relationship, a few families experienced tumultuous encounters. Correspondence in the family is an intricate and alluring marvel. Correspondence between families isn’t restricted to single messages between families or verbal correspondence.
It is a unique cycle that oversees force, closeness and limits, cohesiveness and flexibility of route frameworks, and makes pictures, topics, stories, ceremonies, rules, jobs, making implications, making a feeling of family life An intelligent cycle that makes a model. This model has passed ages. Notwithstanding the view as a family and family automatic framework, one of the greatest exploration establishments in between family correspondence centers around a family correspondence model. Family correspondence model (FCP) hypothesis clarifies why families impart in their own specific manner dependent on one another ‘s psychological direction. Early FCP research established in media research is keen on how families handle broad communications data. Family correspondence was perceived as an exceptional scholastic exploration field by the National Communications Association in 1989. Family correspondence researchers were at first impacted by family research, social brain science, and relational hypothesis, before long built up the hypothesis and began research in a family framework zeroed in on a significant job. Until 2001, the primary issue of the Family Communication Research Journal, Family Communication Magazine, was given. Family correspondence is more than the field of correspondence analysts in the family. Examination on family correspondence is normally done by individuals in brain science, humanism, and family research, to give some examples models. However, as the popular family correspondence researcher Leslie Baxter stated, it is the focal point of this intelligent semantic creation measure making the grant of family correspondence special. In the field of in-home correspondence, correspondence is normally not founded on autonomous messages from one sender to one beneficiary, yet dependent on the dynamic interdependency of data shared among families It is conceptualized. The focal point of this methodology is on the shared trait of semantic development inside family frameworks. As such, producing doesn’t happen in vacuum, however it happens in a wide scope of ages and social exchange.
Standards are rules end up being followed when performing work to agree to a given objective. Hierarchical achievement relies significantly upon compelling correspondence. So as to successfully impart, it is important to follow a few standards and rules. Coming up next are rules to guarantee powerful correspondence: clearness: lucidity of data is a significant guideline of correspondence. For beneficiaries to know the message plainly, the messages ought to be sorted out in a basic language. To guarantee that beneficiaries can without much of a stretch comprehend the importance of the message, the sender needs to impart unmistakably and unhesitatingly so the beneficiary can plainly and unquestionably comprehend the data.>
