Self Risk Assessment Guidelines

Self Risk Assessment Guidelines ;

PURPOSE
The purpose of this application is to provide students an opportunity to assess on their own health status by utilizing the Leddy’s (2006) Theory of Healthiness, and develop strategies for improvement in their health status. This exercise will serve as a basis for utilizing this process with their client populations.
POINTS
This assignment is worth a total of 100 points.
REQUIREMENTS
1.   The Self-Assessment of Risk Factors is worth 100 points and will be graded on quality of self-assessment, use of citations, use of Standard English grammar, sentence structure, and overall organization based on the required components as summarized in the directions and grading criteria/rubric.
2.   Create your assignment using Microsoft Word. You can tell that the document is saved as a MS Word document because it will end in “.docx”
3.   Follow the directions and grading criteria closely.
4.   The length of the self-risk assessment is to be no less than 700 words and no greater than 1000 words excluding title page and reference page(s).
5.   APA format is required with both a title page and reference page(s). Use the required components of the review as Level 1 headers (upper and lower case, centered):
a.   Leddy’s Healthiness Scale
b.   Interpretation of self assessment
c.   Identify interventions to improve health status
d.   Implications for clinical practice
e.   Conclusion

DIRECTIONS AND GRADING CRITERIA
Category   Points   %   Description
Self Assessment utilizing Leddy’s Healthness Scale   10   10%   The student will fill out the Leddy Healthiness Scale found in the Appendix of the Leddy textbook. Scan the scale when completed for submission; make sure the score is calculated per the directions.
Utilization of Leddy’s Model for interpretation of self assessment   50   50%   According to Leddy (2006) one manifestation of a health pattern is healthiness, which is defined as a measurable process among perceived purpose, connections and power to achieve goals. The healthiness theory includes the dimension of meaningfulness, goals connectedness, challenge, confidence, capacity, choice, capability to function, and control. Analyze your own assessment, and identify the areas of strength and the areas on which to focus to improve your health.
Development of Interventions   20   20%   Based on the self assessment of your health status, identify interventions to improve your health status
Implications   10   10%   Identify how you can utilize Leddy’s Health Theory in your clinical practice
Clarity of writing   5   5%   Use of standard English grammar and sentence structure. No spelling errors or typographical errors. Organized around the required components using appropriate headers.
APA format   5   5%   All information taken from another source, even if summarized, must be appropriately cited in the manuscript and listed in the references using APA (6th ed.) format:
1.   Document setup
2.   Title and reference pages
3.   Citations in the text and references.
Total:   100
100%
A quality assignment will meet or exceed all of the above requirements.

Grading Rubric
Assignment Criteria    Meets Criteria   Partially Meets Criteria   Does Not Meet Criteria
Self Assessment utilizing Leddy’s Healthiness Scale
(10 pts)   Leddy’s Healthiness Scale is completed and scored properly and submitted. Rationale is well presented and purpose fully developed.
8 – 10 points   Leddy’s Healthiness Scale is partially completed and scored and submitted
5 – 7 points   Leddy’s Healthiness Scale is not completed or not scored or not submitted
0 – 4 points
Utilization of Leddy’s Healthiness Scale for the identification of personal strengths and weaknesses
(50 pts)   Excellent self-assessment of healthiness, strengths and weaknesses identified and supported with examples.
45 – 50 points   Basic self-assessment of healthiness, strengths and weaknesses identified and only partially supported with examples.
34 – 44 points   Little or very general self-assessment of
Healthiness, strengths and weaknesses identified and not supported with examples.
0 – 33 points
Development of interventions
(20 pts)   Excellent understanding and development of applicable interventions. Conclusions are well evidenced and fully developed.
25 – 30 points   Basic understanding and/or limited development of applicable interventions. Conclusions are partially evidenced and partially developed.
15 – 24 points   Little understanding and/or development of applicable interventions. Conclusions are poorly evidenced and/or poorly developed.
0 – 14 points
Implications
(10 points)   Identifies how you can utilize Leddy’s Health Theory in your clinical practice
8 – 10 points   Identifies how to utilize in clinical practice but does not utilize Leddy’s Health Theory
5 – 7 points   Misidentifies how to utilize in clinical practice
0 – 4 points
Clarity of writing
(5 pts)   Excellent use of standard English showing original thought. No spelling or grammar errors. Well organized with proper flow of meaning.
4 – 5 points   Some evidence of own expression and competent use of language. No more than three spelling or grammar errors. Well organized thoughts and concepts.
2 – 3 points   Language needs development. Four or more spelling and/or grammar errors. Poorly organized thoughts and concepts.
0 – 1 point
APA format
(5 pts)   APA format correct with no more than 1-2 minor errors.
4 – 5 points   3-5 errors in APA format and/or 1-2 citations are missing.
2 – 3 points   APA formatting contains multiple errors and/or several citations are missing.
0 – 1 point
Total Points Possible =    100      points

link for Leddy’s textbook (Integrative Health Promotion: Conceptual Bases for Nursing Practice, 2nd Edition) where you can access APPENDIX A Leddy Healthiness Scale:

http://online.vitalsource.com/#/books/9781284044294

PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT 🙂

Compelling correspondence is essential to the achievement all things considered but since of the changing idea of the present working environments, successful correspondence turns out to be more troublesome, and because of the numerous impediments that will permit beneficiaries to acknowledge the plan of the sender It is restricted. Misguided judgments.In spite of the fact that correspondence inside the association is rarely completely open, numerous straightforward arrangements can be executed to advance the effect of these hindrances.

Concerning specific contextual analysis, two significant correspondence standards, correspondence channel determination and commotion are self-evident. This course presents the standards of correspondence, the act of general correspondence, and different speculations to all the more likely comprehend the correspondence exchanges experienced in regular daily existence. The standards and practices that you learn in this course give the premise to additionally learning and correspondence.

This question has been answered

This course starts with an outline of the correspondence cycle, the method of reasoning and hypothesis. In resulting modules of the course, we will look at explicit use of relational connections in close to home and expert life. These incorporate relational correspondence, bunch correspondence and dynamic, authoritative correspondence in the work environment or relational correspondence. Rule of Business Communication In request to make correspondence viable, it is important to follow a few rules and standards. Seven of them are fundamental and applicable, and these are clear, finished, brief, obliging, right, thought to be, concrete. These standards are frequently called 7C for business correspondence. The subtleties of these correspondence standards are examined underneath: Politeness Principle: When conveying, we should build up a cordial relationship with every individual who sends data to us.

To be inviting and polite is indistinguishable, and politeness requires an insightful and amicable activity against others. Axioms are notable that gracious “pay of graciousness is the main thing to win everything”. Correspondence staff ought to consistently remember this. The accompanying standards may assist with improving courtesy:Preliminary considering correspondence with family All glad families have the mystery of progress. This achievement originates from a strong establishment of closeness and closeness. Indeed, through private correspondence these cozy family connections become all the more intently. Correspondence is the foundation of different affiliations, building solid partners of obedient devotion, improving family way of life, and assisting with accomplishing satisfaction (Gosche, p. 1). In any case, so as to keep up an amicable relationship, a few families experienced tumultuous encounters. Correspondence in the family is an intricate and alluring marvel. Correspondence between families isn’t restricted to single messages between families or verbal correspondence.

It is a unique cycle that oversees force, closeness and limits, cohesiveness and flexibility of route frameworks, and makes pictures, topics, stories, ceremonies, rules, jobs, making implications, making a feeling of family life An intelligent cycle that makes a model. This model has passed ages. Notwithstanding the view as a family and family automatic framework, one of the greatest exploration establishments in between family correspondence centers around a family correspondence model. Family correspondence model (FCP) hypothesis clarifies why families impart in their own specific manner dependent on one another ‘s psychological direction. Early FCP research established in media research is keen on how families handle broad communications data. Family correspondence was perceived as an exceptional scholastic exploration field by the National Communications Association in 1989. Family correspondence researchers were at first impacted by family research, social brain science, and relational hypothesis, before long built up the hypothesis and began research in a family framework zeroed in on a significant job. Until 2001, the primary issue of the Family Communication Research Journal, Family Communication Magazine, was given. Family correspondence is more than the field of correspondence analysts in the family. Examination on family correspondence is normally done by individuals in brain science, humanism, and family research, to give some examples models. However, as the popular family correspondence researcher Leslie Baxter stated, it is the focal point of this intelligent semantic creation measure making the grant of family correspondence special. In the field of in-home correspondence, correspondence is normally not founded on autonomous messages from one sender to one beneficiary, yet dependent on the dynamic interdependency of data shared among families It is conceptualized. The focal point of this methodology is on the shared trait of semantic development inside family frameworks. As such, producing doesn’t happen in vacuum, however it happens in a wide scope of ages and social exchange.

Standards are rules end up being followed when performing work to agree to a given objective. Hierarchical achievement relies significantly upon compelling correspondence. So as to successfully impart, it is important to follow a few standards and rules. Coming up next are rules to guarantee powerful correspondence: clearness: lucidity of data is a significant guideline of correspondence. For beneficiaries to know the message plainly, the messages ought to be sorted out in a basic language. To guarantee that beneficiaries can without much of a stretch comprehend the importance of the message, the sender needs to impart unmistakably and unhesitatingly so the beneficiary can plainly and unquestionably comprehend the data.>

Self Risk Assessment Guidelines

Sample Answer

Our Services

Secure Checkout

Our Advantages