Research Summary/Literature Review “Diagnosis and Treatment of Depression in the Elderly”
Obviously, this is for my Psy 101 class. I can put it in APA myself since that probably costs extra. Must be:
must incorporate at least 4 academic sources: 1 must be the textbook – “Exploring Psy” 9th edition by David Myers, 3- 5 must be PEER REVIEWED JOURNAL ARTICLES, and the other can be an appropriate secondary source (or another article).
The paper will be used to create a presentation – Power Point – that I will have to give in class – don’t know what kind of pictures I would need but I could always download them on a flash drive. (or whatever you would send me for the presentation) must be well organized and engaging (teacher’s words) I’ve never done this before – give a presentation. These are the teacher”s instructions, but being experts at this you probably already know. But anyway……..I’ll try to give you a brief (haha) summary.
synthesize research on a topic in psy while also shedding light on that topic – do substantial research both online and in the library. – don’t just find all of the relevant articles on the topic, but also to evaluate those sources – use original sources – empirical sources – those that report research findings for the first time – obviously come up with a thesis statement – this should present some conclusion about the research – summarizes, integrates or reinterprets the data – a theory that explains why two sets of research seem contradictory or a theory of how two seemingly disparate research traditions are relevant to one another divided into six parts indicated by subheadings: literature review are not divided into a fexed set of specific sections but you should use sub-headings when introducing new topic areas withing a paper – should include a clear introduction, a body in which the evidence is presented and a discussion.
Some questions to consider:
INTRO – Why is this topic important? What is the history of the topic? What are the related theories or findings? What is your claim or thesis statement.
BODY – What is the evidence that supports your claim? What evidence runs contrary to your claim and how do you reconcile that with your claim? Describe research, that has previously been done, as well as any controversies or alternate opinions. Relate the evidence you present to the major conclusions you are trying to make.
DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION/IMPLICATIONS – What is your final conclusion – what questions remain – what does your conclusion mean for other people’s theories or explanations? Synthesize the findings you described in the body into a succinct summary and close the loop (whatever that means lol). Also discuss the possible implications of your argument for existing theories and for everyday life. WOW! I want to thank you ahead of time.
PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT 🙂
Compelling correspondence is essential to the achievement all things considered but since of the changing idea of the present working environments, successful correspondence turns out to be more troublesome, and because of the numerous impediments that will permit beneficiaries to acknowledge the plan of the sender It is restricted. Misguided judgments.In spite of the fact that correspondence inside the association is rarely completely open, numerous straightforward arrangements can be executed to advance the effect of these hindrances.
Concerning specific contextual analysis, two significant correspondence standards, correspondence channel determination and commotion are self-evident. This course presents the standards of correspondence, the act of general correspondence, and different speculations to all the more likely comprehend the correspondence exchanges experienced in regular daily existence. The standards and practices that you learn in this course give the premise to additionally learning and correspondence.
This course starts with an outline of the correspondence cycle, the method of reasoning and hypothesis. In resulting modules of the course, we will look at explicit use of relational connections in close to home and expert life. These incorporate relational correspondence, bunch correspondence and dynamic, authoritative correspondence in the work environment or relational correspondence. Rule of Business Communication In request to make correspondence viable, it is important to follow a few rules and standards. Seven of them are fundamental and applicable, and these are clear, finished, brief, obliging, right, thought to be, concrete. These standards are frequently called 7C for business correspondence. The subtleties of these correspondence standards are examined underneath: Politeness Principle: When conveying, we should build up a cordial relationship with every individual who sends data to us.
To be inviting and polite is indistinguishable, and politeness requires an insightful and amicable activity against others. Axioms are notable that gracious “pay of graciousness is the main thing to win everything”. Correspondence staff ought to consistently remember this. The accompanying standards may assist with improving courtesy:Preliminary considering correspondence with family All glad families have the mystery of progress. This achievement originates from a strong establishment of closeness and closeness. Indeed, through private correspondence these cozy family connections become all the more intently. Correspondence is the foundation of different affiliations, building solid partners of obedient devotion, improving family way of life, and assisting with accomplishing satisfaction (Gosche, p. 1). In any case, so as to keep up an amicable relationship, a few families experienced tumultuous encounters. Correspondence in the family is an intricate and alluring marvel. Correspondence between families isn’t restricted to single messages between families or verbal correspondence.
It is a unique cycle that oversees force, closeness and limits, cohesiveness and flexibility of route frameworks, and makes pictures, topics, stories, ceremonies, rules, jobs, making implications, making a feeling of family life An intelligent cycle that makes a model. This model has passed ages. Notwithstanding the view as a family and family automatic framework, one of the greatest exploration establishments in between family correspondence centers around a family correspondence model. Family correspondence model (FCP) hypothesis clarifies why families impart in their own specific manner dependent on one another ‘s psychological direction. Early FCP research established in media research is keen on how families handle broad communications data. Family correspondence was perceived as an exceptional scholastic exploration field by the National Communications Association in 1989. Family correspondence researchers were at first impacted by family research, social brain science, and relational hypothesis, before long built up the hypothesis and began research in a family framework zeroed in on a significant job. Until 2001, the primary issue of the Family Communication Research Journal, Family Communication Magazine, was given. Family correspondence is more than the field of correspondence analysts in the family. Examination on family correspondence is normally done by individuals in brain science, humanism, and family research, to give some examples models. However, as the popular family correspondence researcher Leslie Baxter stated, it is the focal point of this intelligent semantic creation measure making the grant of family correspondence special. In the field of in-home correspondence, correspondence is normally not founded on autonomous messages from one sender to one beneficiary, yet dependent on the dynamic interdependency of data shared among families It is conceptualized. The focal point of this methodology is on the shared trait of semantic development inside family frameworks. As such, producing doesn’t happen in vacuum, however it happens in a wide scope of ages and social exchange.
Standards are rules end up being followed when performing work to agree to a given objective. Hierarchical achievement relies significantly upon compelling correspondence. So as to successfully impart, it is important to follow a few standards and rules. Coming up next are rules to guarantee powerful correspondence: clearness: lucidity of data is a significant guideline of correspondence. For beneficiaries to know the message plainly, the messages ought to be sorted out in a basic language. To guarantee that beneficiaries can without much of a stretch comprehend the importance of the message, the sender needs to impart unmistakably and unhesitatingly so the beneficiary can plainly and unquestionably comprehend the data.>