Reading I NEED HELP ON MY HOMEWORK 2

Book review: Chose between the “Power of One” by Frances Haugen or “Pornography and Public Health” by Emily Rothman.

Book Review Assignment: The Power of One by Frances Haugen (750 words)

Haugen notes that for some of the teens devoted to Instagram, the peer pressure generated by the visually focused app led to mental health and body-image problems, and in some cases, eating disorders and suicidal thoughts, the research leaked by Haugen showed. One internal study cited 13.5% of teen girls saying Instagram makes thoughts of suicide worse and 17% of teen girls saying it makes eating disorders worse.

Big picture, here is what your review should include:

1. Provide an introduction to the review, including bibliographic information and an overview of the memoir’s central premise.
2. Demonstrate an understanding of the memoir’s themes, these may include topics such as: Facebook transparency, accountability in tech, and the impact of social media on society. Discusses these themes with specific references to Haugen’s experiences.
3. Provide a critical analysis of Haugen’s arguments and the broader implications for the tech industry and society.
4. Discusses the effectiveness of Haugen’s narrative in conveying her message.
5. Use multiple, detailed examples from the memoir to support the analysis of Haugen’s experiences and the issues raised.
6. Ask yourself: is this review well-written with no grammatical errors and a clear, coherent structure that enhances the analysis?

Was in the book an insightful exploration of the inner workings of Facebook and the broader tech industry?

Did Haugen provide a detailed account of her journey from a humble background to becoming a whistleblower, revealing the harmful effects of Facebook’s algorithms and lack of transparency

How about the idea of a broader wisdom and the personal experiences Haugen shares? Was she effective in conveying the importance of these personal experiences?

Was the book an approachable exploration of complex topics such as algorithms and the potential harm of Facebook’s technologies?

Is the book and her writing a good resource for understanding the issues surrounding social media and how they could realistically be mitigated?

On the negative side did Haugen’s personal grievances sometimes overshadow the larger issues at hand?

Could we view the book more generally as a treatise on truth, with Haugen encouraging other tech employees to stand up against dishonesty?

What did the book tell us about the lack of transparency and harmful algorithms? How effectively did Haugen highlight the dangers of algorithmic systems that prioritize profit over the well-being of users?

What about her journey from idealism to Whistleblowing: Did the book detail Haugen’s personal journey, from her initial belief in the positive potential of social media to her decision to become a whistleblower after she recognized the platforms’ darker aspects and the misuse of algorithms?

What about the role of personal experiences? What?Haugens formative experiences, including her academic background, personal challenges, and moral convictions, and how did they play a significant role in her decision to expose Facebook’s unethical practices?

Can we consider the book a commentary on the impact of tech on democracy and society? What do Haugen’s revelations underscore the negative effects of Facebook’s products on children, the stoking of division, tell us about the weakening of democracy?

Does she effectively make a call for employee empowerment and transparency? Does the memoir effectively serve as a call to action for tech employees to stand up against dishonesty and for companies to embrace transparency to avoid fearing their employees and losing top talent?

Are there insights into corporate responsibility? Can we view Haugen’s story as a testament to the importance of corporate responsibility, human communication, and democracy, as well as the potential for individuals to create significant change?

Finally, what about harm to children? Haugen has pointed out that Facebook’s products can harm children’s mental health. This includes the impact on teenage girls, where the platform’s content and interaction dynamics can exacerbate mental health issues.

What about corporate lying? She states: “The company intentionally hides vital information from the public, from the U.S. government and from governments around the world,” Haugen said in her testimony. “The documents I have provided to Congress prove that Facebook has repeatedly misled the public about what its own research reveals about the safety of children, the efficacy of its artificial intelligence systems and its role in spreading divisive and extreme messages.”

Emily Rothman’s book, Pornography and Public Health, provides a exploration of the complex relationship between pornography and public health issues.

Big picture, here is what your review should include:

A. Provide an introduction to the review, including bibliographic information and an overview of the memoir’s central premise.

B. Demonstrate an understanding of the books themes.

C. Provide a critical analysis of Rothmans arguments and the broader implications for individuals and society.

D. Discusses the effectiveness of Rothmans narrative in conveying her message.

E. Use multiple, detailed examples from the book to support Rothmans analyses experiences and the issues raised.

F. Provide a summary: Does Emily Rothman’s Pornography and Public Health represent a significant contribution to the ongoing debate about the role of pornography in society? Is it a balanced and evidence-based perspective on a contentious topic? Is it an important read for anyone interested in the intersection of media, gender, and public health?

G. Ask yourself: Is this review well-written with no grammatical errors and a clear, coherent structure that enhances the analysis?

Please choose among (several) of the following questions to frame your review:

1. Does the book explore the positive and negative effects of pornography? What does the author hope to accomplish by considering pornography to be a public health crisis despite the lack of governmental support for this idea in the US?
2. Does Rothman provide a successful overview of pornography viewers, the content they are likely to encounter, and how this content has evolved over time?
3. Is the author successful in describing the impact of pornography on various aspects of human behavior and health, including aggression, body image, and compulsive use, while also acknowledging the potential benefits of porn literacy in certain contexts?
4. Rothmans approach is evidence-based. Is she successful on drawing on research and data analysis?
5. Rothman aims to offer meaningful guidance for practice and policy. Is she successful in suggesting ways to minimize possible harms associated with pornography?
6. The book covers a range of subtopics within pornography scholarship. Is it a comprehensive resource for understanding one of the most complicated issues in health and human behavior today?
7. Rothmans main argument is that while pornography may have various impacts on individuals, it should not be characterized as a public health crisis, and public health approaches should be evidence-based and nuanced, considering both potential harms and benefits of pornography use. What do you think about this argument?
8. She advocates for harm reduction goals, such as motivating people to use less extreme pornography and less frequently, and increasing pornography literacy, rather than trying to end all use. Are these important goals?
9. Additional points you may wish to address:

a. Rothmans argument is that while pornography can have negative health consequences for some individuals, it does not constitute a public health crisis as some have claimed. What is your opinion?

b. Rothman argues against the notion that pornography is a crisis by stating that it does not fulfill the public health fields definition of a public health crisis. She points out that pornography use has increased steadily over time rather than spiking or reaching a tipping point; it does not lead directly or imminently to death, disease, property destruction, or population displacement; and it does not overwhelm local health systems. What do you think about these ideas?

c. Rothmans approach is evidence-based, and she suggests that there may be negative health consequences for some people who use pornography, no substantial consequences for the majority, and even positive effects for some individuals, such as through safer sexual behaviors like solo masturbation. What do you think about these ideas?

Compelling correspondence is essential to the achievement all things considered but since of the changing idea of the present working environments, successful correspondence turns out to be more troublesome, and because of the numerous impediments that will permit beneficiaries to acknowledge the plan of the sender It is restricted. Misguided judgments.In spite of the fact that correspondence inside the association is rarely completely open, numerous straightforward arrangements can be executed to advance the effect of these hindrances.

Concerning specific contextual analysis, two significant correspondence standards, correspondence channel determination and commotion are self-evident. This course presents the standards of correspondence, the act of general correspondence, and different speculations to all the more likely comprehend the correspondence exchanges experienced in regular daily existence. The standards and practices that you learn in this course give the premise to additionally learning and correspondence.

This question has been answered

This course starts with an outline of the correspondence cycle, the method of reasoning and hypothesis. In resulting modules of the course, we will look at explicit use of relational connections in close to home and expert life. These incorporate relational correspondence, bunch correspondence and dynamic, authoritative correspondence in the work environment or relational correspondence. Rule of Business Communication In request to make correspondence viable, it is important to follow a few rules and standards. Seven of them are fundamental and applicable, and these are clear, finished, brief, obliging, right, thought to be, concrete. These standards are frequently called 7C for business correspondence. The subtleties of these correspondence standards are examined underneath: Politeness Principle: When conveying, we should build up a cordial relationship with every individual who sends data to us.

To be inviting and polite is indistinguishable, and politeness requires an insightful and amicable activity against others. Axioms are notable that gracious “pay of graciousness is the main thing to win everything”. Correspondence staff ought to consistently remember this. The accompanying standards may assist with improving courtesy:Preliminary considering correspondence with family All glad families have the mystery of progress. This achievement originates from a strong establishment of closeness and closeness. Indeed, through private correspondence these cozy family connections become all the more intently. Correspondence is the foundation of different affiliations, building solid partners of obedient devotion, improving family way of life, and assisting with accomplishing satisfaction (Gosche, p. 1). In any case, so as to keep up an amicable relationship, a few families experienced tumultuous encounters. Correspondence in the family is an intricate and alluring marvel. Correspondence between families isn’t restricted to single messages between families or verbal correspondence.

It is a unique cycle that oversees force, closeness and limits, cohesiveness and flexibility of route frameworks, and makes pictures, topics, stories, ceremonies, rules, jobs, making implications, making a feeling of family life An intelligent cycle that makes a model. This model has passed ages. Notwithstanding the view as a family and family automatic framework, one of the greatest exploration establishments in between family correspondence centers around a family correspondence model. Family correspondence model (FCP) hypothesis clarifies why families impart in their own specific manner dependent on one another ‘s psychological direction. Early FCP research established in media research is keen on how families handle broad communications data. Family correspondence was perceived as an exceptional scholastic exploration field by the National Communications Association in 1989. Family correspondence researchers were at first impacted by family research, social brain science, and relational hypothesis, before long built up the hypothesis and began research in a family framework zeroed in on a significant job. Until 2001, the primary issue of the Family Communication Research Journal, Family Communication Magazine, was given. Family correspondence is more than the field of correspondence analysts in the family. Examination on family correspondence is normally done by individuals in brain science, humanism, and family research, to give some examples models. However, as the popular family correspondence researcher Leslie Baxter stated, it is the focal point of this intelligent semantic creation measure making the grant of family correspondence special. In the field of in-home correspondence, correspondence is normally not founded on autonomous messages from one sender to one beneficiary, yet dependent on the dynamic interdependency of data shared among families It is conceptualized. The focal point of this methodology is on the shared trait of semantic development inside family frameworks. As such, producing doesn’t happen in vacuum, however it happens in a wide scope of ages and social exchange.

Standards are rules end up being followed when performing work to agree to a given objective. Hierarchical achievement relies significantly upon compelling correspondence. So as to successfully impart, it is important to follow a few standards and rules. Coming up next are rules to guarantee powerful correspondence: clearness: lucidity of data is a significant guideline of correspondence. For beneficiaries to know the message plainly, the messages ought to be sorted out in a basic language. To guarantee that beneficiaries can without much of a stretch comprehend the importance of the message, the sender needs to impart unmistakably and unhesitatingly so the beneficiary can plainly and unquestionably comprehend the data.>

Reading I NEED HELP ON MY HOMEWORK 2

Sample Answer

Our Services

Secure Checkout

Our Advantages