|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |  |  | market development strategy; internationalize into China and Australia where data suggests they would be receptive to the brand | market penetration strategy; increased marketing to increase market share within the US | ||
 |  |  |
|
| ||
| Strengths | Weight | AS | TAS | AS | TAS |
1 | customer service | 0.08 | 2 | 0.16 | 4 | 0.32 |
2 | chicken vs beef | 0.03 | 1 | 0.03 | 4 | 0.12 |
3 | restaurant ambiance | 0.06 | 3 | 0.18 | 4 | 0.24 |
4 | face to face ordering | 0.06 | 3 | 0.18 | 4 | 0.24 |
5 | employee engagement | 0.07 | 4 | 0.28 | 2 | 0.14 |
6 | marketing strategies | 0.04 | 1 | 0.04 | 4 | 0.16 |
7 | community outreach | 0.04 | 4 | 0.16 | 3 | 0.12 |
8 | internet presence | 0.04 | 3 | 0.12 | 4 | 0.16 |
9 | collaborative culture | 0.06 | 3 | 0.18 | 4 | 0.24 |
10 | yearly revenue growth | 0.04 | 3 | 0.12 | 4 | 0.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |  |  | market development strategy; internationalize into China and Australia where data suggests they would be receptive to the brand | market penetration strategy; increased marketing to increase market share within the US | ||
 |  |  |
|
| ||
| Weaknesses | Weight | AS | TAS | AS | TAS |
1 | lack of global presence | 0.03 | 4 | 0.12 | 1 | 0.03 |
2 | number of restaurants | 0.03 | 3 | 0.09 | 2 | 0.06 |
3 | operational days (closed on Sundays) | 0.05 | 3 | 0.15 | 2 | 0.10 |
4 | Franchising rules and regulations | 0.07 | 1 | 0.07 | 2 | 0.14 |
5 | Sales performance in relation to political/ social concerns | 0.07 | 4 | 0.28 | 2 | 0.14 |
6 | employee retention / candidate pool in relation to political / social concerns | 0.05 | 4 | 0.20 | 2 | 0.10 |
7 | public image in light of activists | 0.07 | 4 | 0.28 | 2 | 0.14 |
8 | higher prices in relation to other fast-food chains | 0.03 | 2 | 0.06 | 1 | 0.03 |
9 | limited menu choices | 0.03 | 4 | 0.12 | 2 | 0.06 |
10 | supply chain disruption | 0.05 | 1 | 0.05 | 2 | 0.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |  |  | market development strategy; internationalize into China and Australia where data suggests they would be receptive to the brand | market penetration strategy; increased marketing to increase market share within the US | ||
 |  |  |
|
| ||
| Opportunities | Weight | AS | TAS | AS | TAS |
1 | political stance | 0.04 | 4 | 0.16 | 1 | 0.04 |
2 | closed on Sundays | 0.03 | 4 | 0.12 | 3 | 0.09 |
3 | strict franchising process | 0.03 | 2 | 0.06 | 4 | 0.12 |
4 | product quality | 0.05 | 2 | 0.10 | 4 | 0.20 |
5 | customer service | 0.06 | 3 | 0.18 | 4 | 0.24 |
6 | community involvement | 0.05 | 3 | 0.15 | 4 | 0.20 |
7 | employee engagement | 0.07 | 3 | 0.21 | 4 | 0.28 |
8 | consistency across stores | 0.04 | 3 | 0.12 | 4 | 0.16 |
9 | focus on area of excellence | 0.05 | 3 | 0.15 | 4 | 0.20 |
10 | web presence (brand image) | 0.05 | 3 | 0.15 | 4 | 0.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |  |  | market development strategy; internationalize into China and Australia where data suggests they would be receptive to the brand | market penetration strategy; increased marketing to increase market share within the US | ||
 |  |  |
|
| ||
| Threats | Weight | AS | TAS | AS | TAS |
1 | limited menu choices | 0.08 | 4 | 0.32 | 3 | 0.24 |
2 | closed on Sundays | 0.04 | 2 | 0.08 | 4 | 0.16 |
3 | lack of presence in global market | 0.07 | 2 | 0.14 | 3 | 0.21 |
4 | price point | 0.06 | 1 | 0.06 | 3 | 0.18 |
5 | geographic coverage | 0.03 | 1 | 0.03 | 3 | 0.09 |
6 | strong political stance | 0.05 | 4 | 0.20 | 2 | 0.10 |
7 | rising cost of supplies | 0.05 | 4 | 0.20 | 2 | 0.10 |
8 | strict franchising process | 0.05 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 |
9 | fried food options with focus on healthy diets | 0.05 | 4 | 0.20 | 3 | 0.15 |
10 | lack of innovation | 0.05 | 2 | 0.10 | 1 | 0.05 |
 | TOTALS |  |  | 5.60 |  | 5.81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|