Do you believe it is ever 'ethically right' or 'ethically acceptable' to cheat or lie? If so, under what circumstances? If your answer is 'yes', then describe a situation in which you believe it would be acceptable or right to lie or cheat.
Go on to explain why, in your opinion, that the lying or cheating in that situation was 'right', from an ethical perspective. In your explanation identify at least two beliefs, values, or principles that support your judgment. Are these beliefs or values influenced by culture or religion? Or is your judgment influenced by other factors. Reflect on your moral beliefs and their origins. Begin to think about the origins of your moral beliefs.
awrence Massachusetts in 1995. Answer the following questions as best you can:
Would you react to the fire in the same way Aaaron Feuerstein did? Would you continue to pay workers, incur debt, and rebuild the plant? If not, what decision would you make? It is, of course, impossible to entirely imagine oneself in this situation, but do your best.
Why do make the decision you do? Try to explain not only factual and monetary considerations, but moral considerations, moral values and beliefs, the core values that influence your decisions.
Finally, how does your approach to this moral problem compare with Solomon's characterization of 'integrity'. Do you think your approach exhibits traits of 'integrity'? If so, explain why? If not, explain why not? Be as honest as you can and accurately apply Solomon's ideas on integrity.
If any of the concepts or theories studied in the class relate to your thinking and decision, explain how these concepts and theories are relevant. (for instance, if you think utilitarianism is related to your approach, explain how this is so)