{br} STUCK with your assignment? {br} When is it due? {br} Get FREE assistance. Page Title: {title}{br} Page URL: {url}
UK: +44 748 007-0908, USA: +1 917 810-5386 [email protected]

 

 

In her book Are Prisons Obsolete? Angela Davis makes a strong and, some would say,
controversial argument regarding the need to abolish prisons and replace them with “a constellation of
alternative strategies and institutions” (107). To make this argument, Davis uses a number of different
approaches, including statistics, scholarly research, quotes from different experts, historical sources, and
her own personal experience and the personal experiences of others, among other techniques. Your focus
in this essay will be on what Angela Davis says in her argument, but also, just as important, how she
expresses these things as a writer.
Your assignment is to write about some of the techniques used by Davis to build her argument; how
exactly she brings these different techniques together to make a larger argument in the book; and
whether or not you think she uses each of these techniques effectively and as a result makes a
convincing argument.
After your introductory paragraph, you should begin your essay by briefly summarizing what you see as
Davis’ main argument in Are Prisons Obsolete? (this summary should be no longer than one paragraph
long). Next, in the body of your essay, you should cite, explain, and analyze at least three specific
quotes from her book, looking in detail at the ways that she builds her argument in each of these
passages. Here are some questions you can think about asking for your analysis
How does Angela Davis use quotations from other books and articles?
How does she use information from other experts?
How does she use first-hand accounts of her own experiences, or the personal experiences of
others?
How does she use statistics?
How does she use historical information?
How does she use the arguments of those who might disagree with her?
With each of these approaches, be sure to also answer the question: Does she use this approach or
technique effectively?
As you move towards your conclusion, you should start to answer an important question: Do you find
Angela Davis’ overall argument in Are Prisons Obsolete? to be effective? Why or why not? Be
specific and give examples that will help you support your argument
In other words, I will expect you to work closely with specific passages from Davis’ book throughout this
essay, but I also want you to bring in your own point of view regarding how effectively she uses different
techniques, and especially how persuasive you find her argument to be as a result
While your essay should focus primarily on Are Prisons Obsolete? you should also bring at least one of
the other texts we will be reading during the first weeks of this class into the conversation. These texts
are:
Mariame Kaba, “”Yes, We Mean Literally Abolish the Police”
Angela Wright, “How Armed Police Ofticers on Campus Have Become a Ubiquitous Part of
American College Life
There are a number of ways that you might use one or more of these other texts in your essay. For
example, you might find points from one or more of these articles that agree with and support Angela
Davis` argument; on the other hand, you might find points from one or more articles that disagree with
and contradict Davis” book. You might also compare and contrast some of the approaches taken by these
other writers with Davis’ approach; in making this comparison, you can give your point of view about
which of these readings you found to be most effective, and why

Sample Answer

Compelling correspondence is essential to the achievement all things considered but since of the changing idea of the present working environments, successful correspondence turns out to be more troublesome, and because of the numerous impediments that will permit beneficiaries to acknowledge the plan of the sender It is restricted. Misguided judgments.In spite of the fact that correspondence inside the association is rarely completely open, numerous straightforward arrangements can be executed to advance the effect of these hindrances.

Concerning specific contextual analysis, two significant correspondence standards, correspondence channel determination and commotion are self-evident. This course presents the standards of correspondence, the act of general correspondence, and different speculations to all the more likely comprehend the correspondence exchanges experienced in regular daily existence. The standards and practices that you learn in this course give the premise to additionally learning and correspondence.

This course starts with an outline of the correspondence cycle, the method of reasoning and hypothesis. In resulting modules of the course, we will look at explicit use of relational connections in close to home and expert life. These incorporate relational correspondence, bunch correspondence and dynamic, authoritative correspondence in the work environment or relational correspondence. Rule of Business Communication In request to make correspondence viable, it is important to follow a few rules and standards. Seven of them are fundamental and applicable, and these are clear, finished, brief, obliging, right, thought to be, concrete. These standards are frequently called 7C for business correspondence. The subtleties of these correspondence standards are examined underneath: Politeness Principle: When conveying, we should build up a cordial relationship with every individual who sends data to us.

To be inviting and polite is indistinguishable, and politeness requires an insightful and amicable activity against others. Axioms are notable that gracious “pay of graciousness is the main thing to win everything”. Correspondence staff ought to consistently remember this. The accompanying standards may assist with improving courtesy:Preliminary considering correspondence with family All glad families have the mystery of progress. This achievement originates from a strong establishment of closeness and closeness. Indeed, through private correspondence these cozy family connections become all the more intently. Correspondence is the foundation of different affiliations, building solid partners of obedient devotion, improving family way of life, and assisting with accomplishing satisfaction (Gosche, p. 1). In any case, so as to keep up an amicable relationship, a few families experienced tumultuous encounters. Correspondence in the family is an intricate and alluring marvel. Correspondence between families isn’t restricted to single messages between families or verbal correspondence.

It is a unique cycle that oversees force, closeness and limits, cohesiveness and flexibility of route frameworks, and makes pictures, topics, stories, ceremonies, rules, jobs, making implications, making a feeling of family life An intelligent cycle that makes a model. This model has passed ages. Notwithstanding the view as a family and family automatic framework, one of the greatest exploration establishments in between family correspondence centers around a family correspondence model. Family correspondence model (FCP) hypothesis clarifies why families impart in their own specific manner dependent on one another ‘s psychological direction. Early FCP research established in media research is keen on how families handle broad communications data. Family correspondence was perceived as an exceptional scholastic exploration field by the National Communications Association in 1989. Family correspondence researchers were at first impacted by family research, social brain science, and relational hypothesis, before long built up the hypothesis and began research in a family framework zeroed in on a significant job. Until 2001, the primary issue of the Family Communication Research Journal, Family Communication Magazine, was given. Family correspondence is more than the field of correspondence analysts in the family. Examination on family correspondence is normally done by individuals in brain science, humanism, and family research, to give some examples models. However, as the popular family correspondence researcher Leslie Baxter stated, it is the focal point of this intelligent semantic creation measure making the grant of family correspondence special. In the field of in-home correspondence, correspondence is normally not founded on autonomous messages from one sender to one beneficiary, yet dependent on the dynamic interdependency of data shared among families It is conceptualized. The focal point of this methodology is on the shared trait of semantic development inside family frameworks. As such, producing doesn’t happen in vacuum, however it happens in a wide scope of ages and social exchange.

Standards are rules end up being followed when performing work to agree to a given objective. Hierarchical achievement relies significantly upon compelling correspondence. So as to successfully impart, it is important to follow a few standards and rules. Coming up next are rules to guarantee powerful correspondence: clearness: lucidity of data is a significant guideline of correspondence. For beneficiaries to know the message plainly, the messages ought to be sorted out in a basic language. To guarantee that beneficiaries can without much of a stretch comprehend the importance of the message, the sender needs to impart unmistakably and unhesitatingly so the beneficiary can plainly and unquestionably comprehend the data.>

Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!