The purpose of this assignment is for the student to learn to assimilate, analyze, critique, and summarize original research articles. In other words, select a report of a single, original study.
Through this assignment, the student will demonstrate the ability to:
(CO 2) Formulate and analyze nursing/clinical problems related to nursing and other disciplines. (PO 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10)
(CO 3) Synthesize for dissemination the research findings from nursing and related disciplines. (PO 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 11)
Due Date: Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 3
Total Points Possible: 150 Points
Through this assignment, the student will
1.Conduct a systematic search of relevant databases to find research-based evidence related to a nursing problem (CO 2);
2.Construct a summary table of four peer-reviewed studies, indicating the purpose, sample, design/level of evidence, findings, and limitations of each (CO 3); and
3.Summarize the findings of the four studies as a whole (CO 3).
Preparing the Table
Conduct a PICO(T) search on the nursing problem that you identified in Week 2, Discussion questions. Select the four most recent peer-reviewed studies that describe original research in a single study (do not select a meta-analysis, systematic review of research, or integrative literature review). Refer to the Types of Articles Found in the Nursing and Healthcare document in Doc Sharing to make sure that you are using the correct document.
Construct a table summarizing the four most credible and recent studies, using the Research Summary template on the next page (also found in Doc Sharing). Analyze each article and provide the following information in brief format: purpose of the study; type of sample and number of participants; design of the study, along with the level of evidence; findings of the study; and limitations of the study.
Briefly (23 pages) summarize the results of the four studies as a whole. Follow this outline:
I.In a short paragraph, restate your research question and describe your search strategy. (10 points)
II.Describe the designs used in the studies that you are providing. Where do these studies fall on the Levels of Evidence table in Lessons 1 & 2? (20 points)
III.Based on these studies, what are the findings? What is the answer to the research question? Do the studies fail to answer the question, and if so, why not? (10 points)
IV.Comment on how the sample was selected and on the number of participants. Are they adequate? Why or why not? (10 points)
V.Overall, what are the limitations of the study, and how can these limitations be overcome in subsequent studies? (10 points)
VI.Based on these findings, is the evidence that you found on your topic strong enough to suggest a change in practice or an idea for practice? Please provide a rationale for your answer. (10 points)
Provide your references, formatted in APA style, after the summary.
Research Summary Table (template provided in separate document)
Student Name: ___________________
Author (year)PurposeSample/Number of Participants (provide descriptive statistics)DesignLevel of EvidenceFindings (provide any inferential statistics)Limitations
Instructions for setting up your paper in APA 6th ed format.
Look at the example document for this assignment. Start your paper as you would other APA 6th ed format professional papers. Copy and paste the table into your APA paper. This should allow your paper to remain in a vertical format. Your paper should be one document. ?
Selection of Articles106.7Selects appropriate, single studies from professional, peer-reviewed literature.
Analysis of Purposes of Studies106.7Analysis of the purposes of the studies is clear.
Analysis of Study Samples 106.7Analysis of the samples used in the studies is clear.
Analysis of Research Designs/Levels of Evidence106.7Analysis of the research designs used in the studies is clear. Describes the levels of evidence used in the studies clearly.
Analysis of Findings106.7Analysis of the findings of the studies is clear.
Analysis of Limitations106.7Analysis of the limitations of the studies is clear.
Summary of Articles
(See rubric for categories and breakdown of points.)7046.4Summary of all aspects of the studies is clear and comprehensive. Rationale for decisions related to use of study findings is clear.
Grammar, Punctuation, and Spelling106.7No more than 03 errors in grammar, punctuation, and spelling.
APA Formatting106.7APA formatting is correct with 03 errors.
Total150100A quality paper will meet or exceed all of the above requirements.
Outstanding or highest level of performanceB
Very good or high level of performanceC
Competent or satisfactory level of performanceF
Poor or failing or unsatisfactory level of performance
Possible Points = 130 Points
Selection of articles10 Points9 Points8 Points7-0 Points
Selects four appropriate, single studies from professional, peer-reviewed literature.
Three of the articles selected are appropriate, single studies from professional, peer-reviewed literature.Two of the articles selected are appropriate, single studies from professional, peer-reviewed literature.
One of the articles selected is an appropriate, single study from professional, peer-reviewed literature or none of the articles are appropriate.
Analysis of the purposes of the studies in the table10 Points9 Points8 Points7-0 Points
Analysis of the purposes of the four studies is clear.
Analysis of the purposes of at least three of the studies is clear.Analysis of the purposes of at least two of the studies is clear.Analysis of the purpose of one of the studies is clear. Or, there is no analysis of any studies.
Analysis of the study samples in the table.10 Points9 Points8 Points7-0 Points
Analysis of the samples used in the four studies is clear.
Analysis of the samples of at least three of the studies is clear.Analysis of the samples of at least two of the studies is clear.Analysis of the samples of one of the studies is clear. Or, there is no analysis of any sample.
Analysis of research designs in the table and summary as well as level of evidence10 Points9 Points8 Points7-0 Points
Analysis of the research designs used in the four studies is clear & describes the level of evidence for all 4 articles.
Analysis of the research designs of at least three of the studies is clear &/or describes level of evidence for 3 articles.Analysis of the research designs of at least two of the studies is clear &/or describes level of evidence for 2 articles.Analysis of the research designs of one of the studies is clear. Or, there is not analysis of any research design. No levels of evidence present.
Analysis of findings in the table 10 Points9 Points8 Points7-0 Points
Analysis of the findings of the four studies is clear.
Analysis of the findings of at least three of the studies is clear.Analysis of the findings of at least two of the studies is clear.Analysis of the findings of one of the studies is clear. Or, there is not analysis of findings from any study.
Analysis of limitations in the table
10 Points9 Points8 Points7-0 Points
Analysis of the limitations of the four studies is clear.Analysis of the limitations of at least three of the studies is clear.Analysis of the limitations of at least two of the studies is clear.Analysis of the limitations of one of the studies is clear. Or, there is no analysis of limitations.
Restatement of the research question and describes the search strategy used10 Points9 Points8 Points7-0 Points
Fully describes the research question and search strategy used.
Partially describes the research question and search strategy. used.
Weakly describes the research question and search strategy used.
PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT 🙂
Compelling correspondence is essential to the achievement all things considered but since of the changing idea of the present working environments, successful correspondence turns out to be more troublesome, and because of the numerous impediments that will permit beneficiaries to acknowledge the plan of the sender It is restricted. Misguided judgments.In spite of the fact that correspondence inside the association is rarely completely open, numerous straightforward arrangements can be executed to advance the effect of these hindrances.
Concerning specific contextual analysis, two significant correspondence standards, correspondence channel determination and commotion are self-evident. This course presents the standards of correspondence, the act of general correspondence, and different speculations to all the more likely comprehend the correspondence exchanges experienced in regular daily existence. The standards and practices that you learn in this course give the premise to additionally learning and correspondence.
This course starts with an outline of the correspondence cycle, the method of reasoning and hypothesis. In resulting modules of the course, we will look at explicit use of relational connections in close to home and expert life. These incorporate relational correspondence, bunch correspondence and dynamic, authoritative correspondence in the work environment or relational correspondence. Rule of Business Communication In request to make correspondence viable, it is important to follow a few rules and standards. Seven of them are fundamental and applicable, and these are clear, finished, brief, obliging, right, thought to be, concrete. These standards are frequently called 7C for business correspondence. The subtleties of these correspondence standards are examined underneath: Politeness Principle: When conveying, we should build up a cordial relationship with every individual who sends data to us.
To be inviting and polite is indistinguishable, and politeness requires an insightful and amicable activity against others. Axioms are notable that gracious “pay of graciousness is the main thing to win everything”. Correspondence staff ought to consistently remember this. The accompanying standards may assist with improving courtesy:Preliminary considering correspondence with family All glad families have the mystery of progress. This achievement originates from a strong establishment of closeness and closeness. Indeed, through private correspondence these cozy family connections become all the more intently. Correspondence is the foundation of different affiliations, building solid partners of obedient devotion, improving family way of life, and assisting with accomplishing satisfaction (Gosche, p. 1). In any case, so as to keep up an amicable relationship, a few families experienced tumultuous encounters. Correspondence in the family is an intricate and alluring marvel. Correspondence between families isn’t restricted to single messages between families or verbal correspondence.
It is a unique cycle that oversees force, closeness and limits, cohesiveness and flexibility of route frameworks, and makes pictures, topics, stories, ceremonies, rules, jobs, making implications, making a feeling of family life An intelligent cycle that makes a model. This model has passed ages. Notwithstanding the view as a family and family automatic framework, one of the greatest exploration establishments in between family correspondence centers around a family correspondence model. Family correspondence model (FCP) hypothesis clarifies why families impart in their own specific manner dependent on one another ‘s psychological direction. Early FCP research established in media research is keen on how families handle broad communications data. Family correspondence was perceived as an exceptional scholastic exploration field by the National Communications Association in 1989. Family correspondence researchers were at first impacted by family research, social brain science, and relational hypothesis, before long built up the hypothesis and began research in a family framework zeroed in on a significant job. Until 2001, the primary issue of the Family Communication Research Journal, Family Communication Magazine, was given. Family correspondence is more than the field of correspondence analysts in the family. Examination on family correspondence is normally done by individuals in brain science, humanism, and family research, to give some examples models. However, as the popular family correspondence researcher Leslie Baxter stated, it is the focal point of this intelligent semantic creation measure making the grant of family correspondence special. In the field of in-home correspondence, correspondence is normally not founded on autonomous messages from one sender to one beneficiary, yet dependent on the dynamic interdependency of data shared among families It is conceptualized. The focal point of this methodology is on the shared trait of semantic development inside family frameworks. As such, producing doesn’t happen in vacuum, however it happens in a wide scope of ages and social exchange.
Standards are rules end up being followed when performing work to agree to a given objective. Hierarchical achievement relies significantly upon compelling correspondence. So as to successfully impart, it is important to follow a few standards and rules. Coming up next are rules to guarantee powerful correspondence: clearness: lucidity of data is a significant guideline of correspondence. For beneficiaries to know the message plainly, the messages ought to be sorted out in a basic language. To guarantee that beneficiaries can without much of a stretch comprehend the importance of the message, the sender needs to impart unmistakably and unhesitatingly so the beneficiary can plainly and unquestionably comprehend the data.>