{br} STUCK with your assignment? {br} When is it due? {br} Get FREE assistance. Page Title: {title}{br} Page URL: {url}
UK: +44 748 007-0908, USA: +1 917 810-5386 [email protected]

Nike’s defence against worker abuse

Nike’s Defense of Its Vietnamese Factories
Like many other American apparel makers. Nike uses various subcontractors in Asia to manufacture its products. Some 150 Nike subcontracted factories employ more than 450,000 workers, In Nike’s early days, before orders shifted to lower-cost suppliers in Taiwan and South Korea, the company imported its shoes from Japan. Soon, even Taiwan and South Korea became too expensive for this highly competitive market, and suppliers moved their factories to China and Indonesia. Then Nike found Vietnam. Soon Nike became Vietnam’s largest single employer. Ets factories in Vietnam are run by the company’s South Korean and Taiwanese contractors, who employ tens of thousands of Vietnamese. By 1998, one out of every ten, pairs of Nike shoes came from Viet-nam. Shipments of Nike shoes alone accounted for 5 percent of Vietnam’s total exports.1 One of Southeast Asia’s poorest economies, Vietnam aas an official rural unemployment of about 27 percent in some regions. It seeks foreign invest-ment to create jobs and bring in manufacturing expertise. However, unlike many governments that do not investigate worker abuses, Vietnam pays close attention to the practices of its foreign investors and has some of the region’s toughest laws aimed at protecting workers. It ensures a minimum wage, sets overtime limits, and permits strikes. Vietnamese government officials, how-ever, have divided priorities. While union leaders say that they are duty-bound to defend workers, investment planners want trade unions to not scare away foreign investors. If Nike were to pull out of Vietnam, 35,000 Vietnamese would be out of work .2
ALLEGATIONS OF ABUSE
In the mid-1990s, allegations of worker abuses in factories that contracted with Nike began to mount. An investigation of Nike labor practices in Vietnam was launched in 1998. The report found that by not directly running the factories where its products were made, Nike had little control over internal labor condi-tions, The report, focusing on factories in and around Ho Chi Minh City,
This case was prepared by Sasha Lyutse, under the supervision of Tom L Beauchamp. Not to be duplicated without permission of the holder of the copyright, 0 200313 by Tom L. Beauchamp.
177

1/ DESCRIBE the DILEMMA in the CASE.  Instead of describing what happened in the case, try to describe the dilemma and the cultural (organizational, national, ethnic, gender, etc) and ethical problems faced by the different people who are involved in the case.  Describe the different alternatives that people faced in this dilemma, and the potential consequences for them in light of these alternatives.
2/ IDENTIFY the POSITIONS of the different people who are involved.  Describe in detail any particular actions or words that were said, how they were said, the values that were in conflict, and the concepts which can be brought to light by examining this dilemma. Please make reference to any concepts/models/frameworks from both the ethical part as well as the intercultural part.
3/ ANALYZE the ACTIONS and ORIGINS of the different stakeholders.  Address sections a and b below and the response should answer the questions they raise.
a/ Who acted on this ethical dilemma?
Who acted, and what was done?  Did some people in the case act and others did not?  Were there pressures to act or not to act?  On whom?  What was said, to whom, when and how? Consider what enabled people to act: a conversation, some research into the issue, an organisational enabler?  Were people able to change their circumtances so that they could act (or re-act) on their values?   Did some people give justifications to unethical behaviour? How did others counter these arguments? (Some of the above questions may or may not be relevant, but the questions are there to guide your thinking.)
b/ How does this dilemma reveal any specific cultural concepts and values?   What can you identify here which is specifically linked to national culture and what can you identify which is specifically linked to organizational culture?  What were the specific cultural ‘artefacts’ or symbols you can identify in the situation?  What were the specific cultural biases that each person in the case brought to the table when facing the situation.  How do their reactions reveal their own values/assumptions/beliefs?
4/ Possible ways to RESOLVE the ISSUES.  In light of the above questions, extrapolate some possible solutions for the various stakeholders in this case.  How might they resolve their differences?  If you think a visual representation could help you represent and discuss the resolution process, then please include it.

PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT 🙂

Sample Answer

Compelling correspondence is essential to the achievement all things considered but since of the changing idea of the present working environments, successful correspondence turns out to be more troublesome, and because of the numerous impediments that will permit beneficiaries to acknowledge the plan of the sender It is restricted. Misguided judgments.In spite of the fact that correspondence inside the association is rarely completely open, numerous straightforward arrangements can be executed to advance the effect of these hindrances.

Concerning specific contextual analysis, two significant correspondence standards, correspondence channel determination and commotion are self-evident. This course presents the standards of correspondence, the act of general correspondence, and different speculations to all the more likely comprehend the correspondence exchanges experienced in regular daily existence. The standards and practices that you learn in this course give the premise to additionally learning and correspondence.

This course starts with an outline of the correspondence cycle, the method of reasoning and hypothesis. In resulting modules of the course, we will look at explicit use of relational connections in close to home and expert life. These incorporate relational correspondence, bunch correspondence and dynamic, authoritative correspondence in the work environment or relational correspondence. Rule of Business Communication In request to make correspondence viable, it is important to follow a few rules and standards. Seven of them are fundamental and applicable, and these are clear, finished, brief, obliging, right, thought to be, concrete. These standards are frequently called 7C for business correspondence. The subtleties of these correspondence standards are examined underneath: Politeness Principle: When conveying, we should build up a cordial relationship with every individual who sends data to us.

To be inviting and polite is indistinguishable, and politeness requires an insightful and amicable activity against others. Axioms are notable that gracious “pay of graciousness is the main thing to win everything”. Correspondence staff ought to consistently remember this. The accompanying standards may assist with improving courtesy:Preliminary considering correspondence with family All glad families have the mystery of progress. This achievement originates from a strong establishment of closeness and closeness. Indeed, through private correspondence these cozy family connections become all the more intently. Correspondence is the foundation of different affiliations, building solid partners of obedient devotion, improving family way of life, and assisting with accomplishing satisfaction (Gosche, p. 1). In any case, so as to keep up an amicable relationship, a few families experienced tumultuous encounters. Correspondence in the family is an intricate and alluring marvel. Correspondence between families isn’t restricted to single messages between families or verbal correspondence.

It is a unique cycle that oversees force, closeness and limits, cohesiveness and flexibility of route frameworks, and makes pictures, topics, stories, ceremonies, rules, jobs, making implications, making a feeling of family life An intelligent cycle that makes a model. This model has passed ages. Notwithstanding the view as a family and family automatic framework, one of the greatest exploration establishments in between family correspondence centers around a family correspondence model. Family correspondence model (FCP) hypothesis clarifies why families impart in their own specific manner dependent on one another ‘s psychological direction. Early FCP research established in media research is keen on how families handle broad communications data. Family correspondence was perceived as an exceptional scholastic exploration field by the National Communications Association in 1989. Family correspondence researchers were at first impacted by family research, social brain science, and relational hypothesis, before long built up the hypothesis and began research in a family framework zeroed in on a significant job. Until 2001, the primary issue of the Family Communication Research Journal, Family Communication Magazine, was given. Family correspondence is more than the field of correspondence analysts in the family. Examination on family correspondence is normally done by individuals in brain science, humanism, and family research, to give some examples models. However, as the popular family correspondence researcher Leslie Baxter stated, it is the focal point of this intelligent semantic creation measure making the grant of family correspondence special. In the field of in-home correspondence, correspondence is normally not founded on autonomous messages from one sender to one beneficiary, yet dependent on the dynamic interdependency of data shared among families It is conceptualized. The focal point of this methodology is on the shared trait of semantic development inside family frameworks. As such, producing doesn’t happen in vacuum, however it happens in a wide scope of ages and social exchange.

Standards are rules end up being followed when performing work to agree to a given objective. Hierarchical achievement relies significantly upon compelling correspondence. So as to successfully impart, it is important to follow a few standards and rules. Coming up next are rules to guarantee powerful correspondence: clearness: lucidity of data is a significant guideline of correspondence. For beneficiaries to know the message plainly, the messages ought to be sorted out in a basic language. To guarantee that beneficiaries can without much of a stretch comprehend the importance of the message, the sender needs to impart unmistakably and unhesitatingly so the beneficiary can plainly and unquestionably comprehend the data.>

Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!