{br} STUCK with your assignment? {br} When is it due? {br} Get FREE assistance. Page Title: {title}{br} Page URL: {url}
UK: +44 748 007-0908, USA: +1 917 810-5386 [email protected]

Learning Goal: I’m working on a english question and need the explanation and answer to help me learn.

Persuasive paper: AGING STORIES What to do with literature & media that has not aged well

LENGTH: 1000+ words min. (including MLA Works Cited)
VALUE: 250 pts
DUE: Thursday, February 29

This paper requires research. The internet will be a good source but I want at least one source from the library.

We have all seen TV shows or movies and thought, well THAT didnt age well. It might be a joke we recognize as homophobic, a comment that is mired in gendered stereotypes, or a word that makes us cringe because of its racist overtones some pieces of literature and media just do not age well.

For your persuasive paper, you will be examining pieces of media and literature that are under examination not by outside groups that want to cast an idea or identity out of public discussion, but in many cases by the production companies and publishers (sometimes even the artists themselves).

What kinds of things am I talking about?

  • In 2011, a scholar released an edition of The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn that removed most incidents of racial slurs from the novel;
  • In 2020, streaming services like Hulu and Netflix removed four episodes of 30 Rock containing blackface at the request of Tina Fey;
  • In 2021, the Seuss estate announced it would stop printing and selling 6 Dr. Seuss titles because they included racist stereotypes;
  • In 2022, both Lizzo and Beyonce removed the word spaz from songs after disability rights organizations objected to the use of the slur;
  • In 2023, the estates of Agatha Christie, Ian Flemming, and Roald Dahl all authorized revisions to the language in some books that modern audiences often find offensive
  • In 2023, the live-action release of The Little Mermaid made minor revisions to the lyrics of Kiss the Girl

For this paper, I would like you to consider cases like those listed (and others you run by Maureen) for deeper consideration.

THE RULES

  1. The work you are writing on has or might be eliminated/altered because of a decision made by the publisher or the producer of the work (so not a school board pulling Maus because upset parents). I am asking you to look at these works because these are people and companies that legally can alter the work and because it doesnt take a lot of mental energy to say, Dont ban Maus.)
  2. The change is centered on language or an image in the book, so you can write on the lyric change in Kiss the Girl for this paper, but the casting choices that caused some people to throw a tantrum would be a topic better handled in the research paper, which will be on adaptations.
  3. You may select a specific work (Huck Finn, It Happened on Mulberry Street, Death on the Nile) or a cluster of related works (all of the Ian Flemming re-issues, all of the 30 Rock episodes removed from streaming by Fey’s request, all six of the Dr. Seuss titles that the estate retired). However, I will want concrete examples from the works which can be found through research (so you do not have to read both the old and new versions of every Roald Dahl book).
  4. It is perfectly okay to decide some things should go out of print or have their language altered authors revise their work if it makes their writing more effective. The question before you is whether the original texts are effective, if they could use a bit of help to be more effective for this generation, or if that piece of media or literature needs to fade into the sunset. I want your considered opinion after you have researched and viewed things from all sides deciding to change some words in some Agatha Christie novels is not canceling Christie as a person. Not all published works stand the test of time, so if you decide its time is past, thats your argument. This is not an assignment where I have an answer I want you to give and you have to guess it This is about balancing different viewpoints and coming to your best answer.

WHAT AM I LOOKING FOR IN THIS PAPER

In this assignment, I will be looking for the following components (they can be in this order, but that is not the only way they can be presented):

  • An overview/summary of the materials under consideration, including date and place of publication.
  • A detailed explanation of the problematic language of images (put words you personally would not use in quotation marks it will give you distance while letting you include problematic language; for example, Dahl describes characters as fat and ugly.
  • A discussion of the historic context AND movements or changes that have occurred between the time of original publication or transmission and when the alterations were proposed.
  • A review of positions supporting and opposing making the changes (if everyone agrees with one position, its not a good topic for a persuasive paper).
  • Your considered opinion on whether to revise, not revise, or just let the text fade away

WHAT WILL BE GRADED FOR THIS PAPER

  • How effectively the paper takes a position based on careful and expressed reasoning.
  • Use of research to locate specific details to support all claims.
  • Logical and cohesive structure in the paper including all of the elements in the assignment.
  • Academic tone (you can use contractions, the word “I” to describe your personal experiences with the material, and the singular they but avoid the “you” and put words that seem non-academic or that you would not use in your personal vocabulary in quotation marks. Include attributions like, According to the Seuss estate and never just have a quotation in your paper that is not attached to an attribution or an introduction)
  • Good use of edited style to eliminate repetition and vary sentence lengths, types, and word choice.
  • Run the darn spellcheck.

Sample Answer

Compelling correspondence is essential to the achievement all things considered but since of the changing idea of the present working environments, successful correspondence turns out to be more troublesome, and because of the numerous impediments that will permit beneficiaries to acknowledge the plan of the sender It is restricted. Misguided judgments.In spite of the fact that correspondence inside the association is rarely completely open, numerous straightforward arrangements can be executed to advance the effect of these hindrances.

Concerning specific contextual analysis, two significant correspondence standards, correspondence channel determination and commotion are self-evident. This course presents the standards of correspondence, the act of general correspondence, and different speculations to all the more likely comprehend the correspondence exchanges experienced in regular daily existence. The standards and practices that you learn in this course give the premise to additionally learning and correspondence.

This course starts with an outline of the correspondence cycle, the method of reasoning and hypothesis. In resulting modules of the course, we will look at explicit use of relational connections in close to home and expert life. These incorporate relational correspondence, bunch correspondence and dynamic, authoritative correspondence in the work environment or relational correspondence. Rule of Business Communication In request to make correspondence viable, it is important to follow a few rules and standards. Seven of them are fundamental and applicable, and these are clear, finished, brief, obliging, right, thought to be, concrete. These standards are frequently called 7C for business correspondence. The subtleties of these correspondence standards are examined underneath: Politeness Principle: When conveying, we should build up a cordial relationship with every individual who sends data to us.

To be inviting and polite is indistinguishable, and politeness requires an insightful and amicable activity against others. Axioms are notable that gracious “pay of graciousness is the main thing to win everything”. Correspondence staff ought to consistently remember this. The accompanying standards may assist with improving courtesy:Preliminary considering correspondence with family All glad families have the mystery of progress. This achievement originates from a strong establishment of closeness and closeness. Indeed, through private correspondence these cozy family connections become all the more intently. Correspondence is the foundation of different affiliations, building solid partners of obedient devotion, improving family way of life, and assisting with accomplishing satisfaction (Gosche, p. 1). In any case, so as to keep up an amicable relationship, a few families experienced tumultuous encounters. Correspondence in the family is an intricate and alluring marvel. Correspondence between families isn’t restricted to single messages between families or verbal correspondence.

It is a unique cycle that oversees force, closeness and limits, cohesiveness and flexibility of route frameworks, and makes pictures, topics, stories, ceremonies, rules, jobs, making implications, making a feeling of family life An intelligent cycle that makes a model. This model has passed ages. Notwithstanding the view as a family and family automatic framework, one of the greatest exploration establishments in between family correspondence centers around a family correspondence model. Family correspondence model (FCP) hypothesis clarifies why families impart in their own specific manner dependent on one another ‘s psychological direction. Early FCP research established in media research is keen on how families handle broad communications data. Family correspondence was perceived as an exceptional scholastic exploration field by the National Communications Association in 1989. Family correspondence researchers were at first impacted by family research, social brain science, and relational hypothesis, before long built up the hypothesis and began research in a family framework zeroed in on a significant job. Until 2001, the primary issue of the Family Communication Research Journal, Family Communication Magazine, was given. Family correspondence is more than the field of correspondence analysts in the family. Examination on family correspondence is normally done by individuals in brain science, humanism, and family research, to give some examples models. However, as the popular family correspondence researcher Leslie Baxter stated, it is the focal point of this intelligent semantic creation measure making the grant of family correspondence special. In the field of in-home correspondence, correspondence is normally not founded on autonomous messages from one sender to one beneficiary, yet dependent on the dynamic interdependency of data shared among families It is conceptualized. The focal point of this methodology is on the shared trait of semantic development inside family frameworks. As such, producing doesn’t happen in vacuum, however it happens in a wide scope of ages and social exchange.

Standards are rules end up being followed when performing work to agree to a given objective. Hierarchical achievement relies significantly upon compelling correspondence. So as to successfully impart, it is important to follow a few standards and rules. Coming up next are rules to guarantee powerful correspondence: clearness: lucidity of data is a significant guideline of correspondence. For beneficiaries to know the message plainly, the messages ought to be sorted out in a basic language. To guarantee that beneficiaries can without much of a stretch comprehend the importance of the message, the sender needs to impart unmistakably and unhesitatingly so the beneficiary can plainly and unquestionably comprehend the data.>

Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!