legalizing Gay marriages
Select one of the following countries:
Create a 350- to 500-word cultural evaluation in which you identify the ways that arguments or presentation of the arguments would need to be changed as the result of cultural differences in the country.
Debate Paper Outline
A. The laws concerning marriage within the United States have changed considerably over time, taking into the considerations of the uprising demands for legalizing Gay marriages. We know that Gay marriage is a human right but the big question is whether or not to legalize it.
B. Thesis: Because this should be a matter of civil and equal rights as well, legal arguments in support of gay marriage is getting more attention and the debates over whether or not they should have the same rights as heterosexual couples in marriage are rising.
A. The Constitutional law is changing the face of what America has called a traditional marriage.
1. The institution of marriage has undergone enormous change in recent years as historians believe ending discrimination against same-sex couples in marriage is no more dramatic than other recent changes (GLAD, N.D).
2. The last vestige of discrimination in marriage lies in the refusal of the government to grant same-sex couples access to the institution (GLAD, N.D).
B. Marriage rights and benefits are given to married couples, regardless of the sexual orientation of the domestic partners according to the law.
1. The U.S. government recognizes same-sex marriage for legal purposes even in 34 states that donít allow it (Perez, 2014).
2. The federal election commission said that legally married gay couples must be treated in the same manner as opposite-sex couples under election law (Fynes, 2013).
C. The relationship between the church and marriage is becoming secular.
1. Marriage has a long history in the religious world. It has become so ingrained in the social fabric of the people of the nation, and indeed of the world, that the benefits of marriage to society at large became apparent (usconstitution, 2014).
2. Because this religious rite had so many secular benefits, it became recognized by the secular world, and became subject to governmental definition and regulation (uscconstitution, 2014).
III. Arguments in support of gay marriages having equal rights
A. Marriage can be viewed as a human right, and has been referred to as a civil union among many states for gay couples. If that is so, then why would anyone want to deny a human being a human or civil right?
B. The benefits of marriage to society, apart from any religious concern or duty, include the following: Procreation, Known, or at least presumed, paternity, Child and spousal support, Stability in family life, Survivor’s rights. Not all of these require marriage (usconstitution.net, 2014).
1. There is no secular need for marriage to have procreation, for example. But without marriage, paternity could be difficult to discern, making child support difficult to manage. Note that this list is not exhaustive, and the list shows only the benefits of marriage to society, not the benefits of marriage to the individual. The benefits the individual feels can be quite subjective (usconstitution.net, 2014).
C. What makes others uncomfortable about gay marriage to the point that they do not want it to pass into legislation? There have been a lot of churches (Westborough Baptist being one of the main churches that come up in topics) that are against gay marriage and have even picketed at events such as ìPrideî.
1. Pride is a celebration known as ìgay prideî celebrated in many different communities where gay people gather and participate in events and even attend parades. There are churches that support the gay community and even make floats for the gay pride parades.
IV. Arguments against gay marriages having equal rights
A. Same-sex couples – even if legally married in their state ñ will not be acknowledged as a married couple in another state where itís not legal (Marriage Equality, 1996-2011).
B. There are uncertainties in the factors that determine custody agreements that are disputable in court, in the case of a break up or separation (Nolo, 2014).
C. Gay marriages represent a threat to established norms of authority, identity, and power (Cline, 2014).
A. Thesis: The legal arguments in support of gay marriage will continue to get attention and the debateswill also continue on whether or not gay marriages should have the same civil, human, and equal rights as heterosexual marriages.
Cline, A. (2014). Common Arguments Against Gay Marriage: Moral and Religious Arguments. About. Agnosticism/Atheism. Retrieved on June 15, 2014, from http://atheism.about.com/od/gaymarriage/p/ContraGayMarria.htm
Fynes, G. (2013, July 25). FEC rules that married gay couples have the same rights as straight spouses. The Washington Post. Retrieved on June 16, 2014, from http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2013/07/25/fec-rules-that-married-gay-couples-have-same-rights-as-straight-spouses/
GLAD, (N.D.). Marriage-A History of Change. GLAD: equal justice under law. Retrieved on June 16, 2014, fromhttp://www.outcast-films.com/res_marriage/historyofchange.PDF
Krause, K. W. (2011). What Next for Gay Marriage? The Humanist.
Marriage Equality, (1996-2011). Same-Sex Divorce. Marriage equality usa. Retrieved on June 15, 2014, from http://www.marriageequality.org/divorce
Nolo, (2014). Same-Sex Couples: Child Custody Issues. DivorceNet.com. Retrieved on June 15, 2014, from http://www.divorcenet.com/resources/divorce/same-sex/same-sex-couples-child-custody-issues.htm
Nussbaum, M. (2009). A Right to Marry? Same-sex Marriage and Constitutional Law. Dissent Magazine.
Perez, E. (2014, February 10). U.S. expands legal benefits, services for same-sex marriages. CNN Politics. Retrieved on June 16, 2014, fromhttp://www.cnn.com/2014/02/08/politics/holder-same-sex-marriage-rights/
USconstitution.net, (2014). Constitutional Topic: Marriage. Retrieved on June 16, 2014, fromhttp://www.usconstitution.net/consttop_marr.html
If you would like to look at the cultural evaluation portion and start sharing some ideas with that, that would be greatly appreciated. The country that a few of us agreed on was Brazil.
Compelling correspondence is essential to the achievement all things considered but since of the changing idea of the present working environments, successful correspondence turns out to be more troublesome, and because of the numerous impediments that will permit beneficiaries to acknowledge the plan of the sender It is restricted. Misguided judgments.In spite of the fact that correspondence inside the association is rarely completely open, numerous straightforward arrangements can be executed to advance the effect of these hindrances.
Concerning specific contextual analysis, two significant correspondence standards, correspondence channel determination and commotion are self-evident. This course presents the standards of correspondence, the act of general correspondence, and different speculations to all the more likely comprehend the correspondence exchanges experienced in regular daily existence. The standards and practices that you learn in this course give the premise to additionally learning and correspondence.
This course starts with an outline of the correspondence cycle, the method of reasoning and hypothesis. In resulting modules of the course, we will look at explicit use of relational connections in close to home and expert life. These incorporate relational correspondence, bunch correspondence and dynamic, authoritative correspondence in the work environment or relational correspondence. Rule of Business Communication In request to make correspondence viable, it is important to follow a few rules and standards. Seven of them are fundamental and applicable, and these are clear, finished, brief, obliging, right, thought to be, concrete. These standards are frequently called 7C for business correspondence. The subtleties of these correspondence standards are examined underneath: Politeness Principle: When conveying, we should build up a cordial relationship with every individual who sends data to us.
To be inviting and polite is indistinguishable, and politeness requires an insightful and amicable activity against others. Axioms are notable that gracious “pay of graciousness is the main thing to win everything”. Correspondence staff ought to consistently remember this. The accompanying standards may assist with improving courtesy:Preliminary considering correspondence with family All glad families have the mystery of progress. This achievement originates from a strong establishment of closeness and closeness. Indeed, through private correspondence these cozy family connections become all the more intently. Correspondence is the foundation of different affiliations, building solid partners of obedient devotion, improving family way of life, and assisting with accomplishing satisfaction (Gosche, p. 1). In any case, so as to keep up an amicable relationship, a few families experienced tumultuous encounters. Correspondence in the family is an intricate and alluring marvel. Correspondence between families isn’t restricted to single messages between families or verbal correspondence.
It is a unique cycle that oversees force, closeness and limits, cohesiveness and flexibility of route frameworks, and makes pictures, topics, stories, ceremonies, rules, jobs, making implications, making a feeling of family life An intelligent cycle that makes a model. This model has passed ages. Notwithstanding the view as a family and family automatic framework, one of the greatest exploration establishments in between family correspondence centers around a family correspondence model. Family correspondence model (FCP) hypothesis clarifies why families impart in their own specific manner dependent on one another ‘s psychological direction. Early FCP research established in media research is keen on how families handle broad communications data. Family correspondence was perceived as an exceptional scholastic exploration field by the National Communications Association in 1989. Family correspondence researchers were at first impacted by family research, social brain science, and relational hypothesis, before long built up the hypothesis and began research in a family framework zeroed in on a significant job. Until 2001, the primary issue of the Family Communication Research Journal, Family Communication Magazine, was given. Family correspondence is more than the field of correspondence analysts in the family. Examination on family correspondence is normally done by individuals in brain science, humanism, and family research, to give some examples models. However, as the popular family correspondence researcher Leslie Baxter stated, it is the focal point of this intelligent semantic creation measure making the grant of family correspondence special. In the field of in-home correspondence, correspondence is normally not founded on autonomous messages from one sender to one beneficiary, yet dependent on the dynamic interdependency of data shared among families It is conceptualized. The focal point of this methodology is on the shared trait of semantic development inside family frameworks. As such, producing doesn’t happen in vacuum, however it happens in a wide scope of ages and social exchange.
Standards are rules end up being followed when performing work to agree to a given objective. Hierarchical achievement relies significantly upon compelling correspondence. So as to successfully impart, it is important to follow a few standards and rules. Coming up next are rules to guarantee powerful correspondence: clearness: lucidity of data is a significant guideline of correspondence. For beneficiaries to know the message plainly, the messages ought to be sorted out in a basic language. To guarantee that beneficiaries can without much of a stretch comprehend the importance of the message, the sender needs to impart unmistakably and unhesitatingly so the beneficiary can plainly and unquestionably comprehend the data.>