I. Facts: Summarize the material facts as set forth in the below fact pattern.
II. Issue: The issue is a statement of the question to be addressed in the memorandum. Specifically, you must dis
whether Brown violated Maryland law and identify the specific criminal law code sections.
III. Rule: Cite to the applicable sections of the Criminal Law code that apply to the fact pattern. You may also cite
class materials and any secondary sources to identify and explain the legal standards and rules applicable to dete
whether Brown violated Maryland law.
IV. Analysis: Clearly and thoroughly explain the relevan
The facts are as follows: Julio Manga and his wife are the co-owners of a residence at 123 10th St. Annapolis, MD
Jonathan Brown was at the Manga’s house on Sunday, February 10, 2018, watching the Super Bowl. A concerne
contacted 911 and reported that the occupants of the home were selling drugs out of the home and were presentl
marijuana and that one individual identified as “Brown” had a handgun in his waistband as he entered the residen
on the 911 call, Officers responded to the residence.
The Manga’s’ home has a very large living room window and while walking up to the front door, officers observed
the window Mr. Brown and two other guests sitting on the couch watching television and smoking something. The
detected a distinct odor coming from the residence and observed Mr. Brown hand a very large baggie of greenish
matter next to someone standing near the couch. Based on the officers’ training, knowledge and experience, the
smoking device being used and the distinct odor they detected, the officers reasonably believed the substance th
occupants were smoking and contained within the large baggie was marijuana.
Officers then knocked on the door. After hiding the drugs, Mr. Manga opened the door and granted the officers ac
home and consent to search. When the officers came inside, they informed Mr. Brown and his friends that they ha
witnessed the transfer of a baggie of marijuana between Mr. Brown and another gentleman and that everyone in t
had been observed smoking marijuana through the living room window. Police then observed what looked like a h
sandwiched between the cushions of the couch near Mr. Brown and upon further inspection discovered three add
handguns underneath the same couch. The officers then conducted pat-downs of Mr. Brown and everyone else in
On Mr. Brown’s person, the officers recovered two digital scales and $1,541 in cash. On the person to whom Mr. B
handed the large baggie of greenish-brown matter, officers recovered a large baggie of marijuana. None of the gu
properly registered and none of the occupants have valid permits to carry any firearms.
Discuss the potential charges that can be filed against Brown
Compelling correspondence is essential to the achievement all things considered but since of the changing idea of the present working environments, successful correspondence turns out to be more troublesome, and because of the numerous impediments that will permit beneficiaries to acknowledge the plan of the sender It is restricted. Misguided judgments.In spite of the fact that correspondence inside the association is rarely completely open, numerous straightforward arrangements can be executed to advance the effect of these hindrances.
Concerning specific contextual analysis, two significant correspondence standards, correspondence channel determination and commotion are self-evident. This course presents the standards of correspondence, the act of general correspondence, and different speculations to all the more likely comprehend the correspondence exchanges experienced in regular daily existence. The standards and practices that you learn in this course give the premise to additionally learning and correspondence.
This course starts with an outline of the correspondence cycle, the method of reasoning and hypothesis. In resulting modules of the course, we will look at explicit use of relational connections in close to home and expert life. These incorporate relational correspondence, bunch correspondence and dynamic, authoritative correspondence in the work environment or relational correspondence. Rule of Business Communication In request to make correspondence viable, it is important to follow a few rules and standards. Seven of them are fundamental and applicable, and these are clear, finished, brief, obliging, right, thought to be, concrete. These standards are frequently called 7C for business correspondence. The subtleties of these correspondence standards are examined underneath: Politeness Principle: When conveying, we should build up a cordial relationship with every individual who sends data to us.
To be inviting and polite is indistinguishable, and politeness requires an insightful and amicable activity against others. Axioms are notable that gracious “pay of graciousness is the main thing to win everything”. Correspondence staff ought to consistently remember this. The accompanying standards may assist with improving courtesy:Preliminary considering correspondence with family All glad families have the mystery of progress. This achievement originates from a strong establishment of closeness and closeness. Indeed, through private correspondence these cozy family connections become all the more intently. Correspondence is the foundation of different affiliations, building solid partners of obedient devotion, improving family way of life, and assisting with accomplishing satisfaction (Gosche, p. 1). In any case, so as to keep up an amicable relationship, a few families experienced tumultuous encounters. Correspondence in the family is an intricate and alluring marvel. Correspondence between families isn’t restricted to single messages between families or verbal correspondence.
It is a unique cycle that oversees force, closeness and limits, cohesiveness and flexibility of route frameworks, and makes pictures, topics, stories, ceremonies, rules, jobs, making implications, making a feeling of family life An intelligent cycle that makes a model. This model has passed ages. Notwithstanding the view as a family and family automatic framework, one of the greatest exploration establishments in between family correspondence centers around a family correspondence model. Family correspondence model (FCP) hypothesis clarifies why families impart in their own specific manner dependent on one another ‘s psychological direction. Early FCP research established in media research is keen on how families handle broad communications data. Family correspondence was perceived as an exceptional scholastic exploration field by the National Communications Association in 1989. Family correspondence researchers were at first impacted by family research, social brain science, and relational hypothesis, before long built up the hypothesis and began research in a family framework zeroed in on a significant job. Until 2001, the primary issue of the Family Communication Research Journal, Family Communication Magazine, was given. Family correspondence is more than the field of correspondence analysts in the family. Examination on family correspondence is normally done by individuals in brain science, humanism, and family research, to give some examples models. However, as the popular family correspondence researcher Leslie Baxter stated, it is the focal point of this intelligent semantic creation measure making the grant of family correspondence special. In the field of in-home correspondence, correspondence is normally not founded on autonomous messages from one sender to one beneficiary, yet dependent on the dynamic interdependency of data shared among families It is conceptualized. The focal point of this methodology is on the shared trait of semantic development inside family frameworks. As such, producing doesn’t happen in vacuum, however it happens in a wide scope of ages and social exchange.
Standards are rules end up being followed when performing work to agree to a given objective. Hierarchical achievement relies significantly upon compelling correspondence. So as to successfully impart, it is important to follow a few standards and rules. Coming up next are rules to guarantee powerful correspondence: clearness: lucidity of data is a significant guideline of correspondence. For beneficiaries to know the message plainly, the messages ought to be sorted out in a basic language. To guarantee that beneficiaries can without much of a stretch comprehend the importance of the message, the sender needs to impart unmistakably and unhesitatingly so the beneficiary can plainly and unquestionably comprehend the data.>