Confidentiality, integrity, and availability or the CIA triad of security is introduced in this session. These three dimensions of security may often conflict. Confidentiality and integrity often limit availability. So, a system should provide only what is truly needed. This means that a security expert has to carefully analyze what is more important among these three dimensions of security in a system or application.
Please provide an example (and justification) where the confidentiality of a system is more important than the integrity or availability of that system. Then provide an example where the integrity of a system is more important than the confidentiality or availability of that system. Finally, provide an example of a system where the availability of a system is more important than the confidentiality or integrity of that system. For example, you might say availability is more important than integrity and confidentiality in a cell telephone system since one must be able to reach their loved ones in an emergency. Someone else might argue confidentiality/privacy is more important in such a system.
Word count 600
with at least 4 recent references
rubrics
ain PostingExcellentOutstandingAcceptableNeeds ImprovementNeeds Significant ImprovementMissing or No Work SubmittedCriterion ScoreIntroduction7.5 points
Provided an excellent introduction to the deliverable which clearly, concisely, and accurately addressed the topic of the discussion. Appropriately paraphrased information from authoritative sources.
6.5 points
Provided an outstanding introduction to the deliverable which clearly and accurately addressed the topic of the discussion. Appropriately paraphrased information from authoritative sources.
5.5 points
Provided an acceptable introduction to the deliverable which addressed the topic of the discussion. Appropriately paraphrased information from authoritative sources.
4.5 points
Provided an introduction to the deliverable but the section lacked some required details. Information from authoritative sources was mentioned.
2 points
Attempted to provide an introduction to the deliverable but this section lacked detail and/or was not well supported by information drawn from authoritative sources (too many quotations or improper paraphrasing).
0 points
Introduction was missing or no work submitted.
Score of Introduction,/ 7.5Analysis17.5 points
Provided an excellent analysis of the issues for the required topic. Addressed at least three separate issues and provided appropriate examples for each. Appropriately used and cited information from authoritative sources.
15.5 points