How socio-demographic characteristics impact the experience of space and place

Situate the topic and research question
Describe the methods used and why they are appropriate to answer the research question (explicitly drawing on the methods literature);
Present an analysis of the data produced; and
Provide a reflection on the student’s positionality in the research process. Analysis will include reflections on the things that were difficult for you as a proto-researcher and what you wish you understood better.

Conduct a semi-structured interview (at least 30 minutes) with a friend, relative, classmate, or roommate about their residential experience and daily activities as a student in Atlanta. Using Smith and Fox’s Studentification Guide for North America as a starting point, brainstorm key themes; and design an interview script to explore consisting over 5-7 primary questions with associated secondary follow-up questions. The purpose of the interview is to explore the lived experience of students in the city, including (for example):
• • Housing histories and the (social, geographic, economic) factors shaping residential decisions;
• • Student perceptions of the neighborhoods surrounding campus (Summerhill, Downtown…);

• • How socio-demographic characteristics impact the experience of space and place…
conduct you interview online or using an online platform like WebEx, Skype, FaceTime, or Zoom. Identify themes in your participant’s responses. Transcribe and code your interview and explain how you identified key themes and narratives from your interview.
Project Option 2: Focus Group
Georgia State University is developing a student housing and spurring development in the neighborhood of Summerhill, adjacent to Center Park Stadium – see: https://georgiastatesignal.com/georgia-states- summerhill-project-is-already-an-overwhelming-success/
Using Smith and Fox’s Studentification Guide for North America as a starting point, design and conduct a focus group with 4 people, lasting at least 45 minutes. Your focus group should explore what students think about the transformation of this development, how they have experienced the neighborhood in the past (if at all), their perception of the planned development, and what they think would be important to prompt an inclusive space for students and non-students. Devise questions/prompts to canvas the focus group’s views. In the write-up, identify the key findings from the discussion, and include your reflections on the process.
You may conduct you interview online or using an online platform like WebEx, Skype, FaceTime, or Zoom. You may also reflect on the strengths and limitations of conducting focus group online.
Project Option 3: Participant Observation
Identify a key ‘student space’ in the city. Spend at least one hour as a participant observer and write up your field notes. Select a field site of your choosing in order to understand the spaces and geographies of student life in Atlanta. This can include spaces where they study, live, commute, socialize at night, shop, eat out, or communal spaces in which they spend time around campus.
Develop your observational skills by being attentive to who is there and how people are interacting. What define your site as a ‘student space’. How are social norms (re)produced? Are their tensions between student and non-students? How is social inclusion or exclusion manifested in the social and physical space? Reflect on your role as a participant observer in your chosen setting. Use this information to develop a thick description of your research site, including the social norms, behaviors, and practices necessary to become an ‘insider’. Pay attention to social distancing guidelines.

7
Project Option 4: Photo Elicitation
Ask a friend to think about the places in the Atlanta area where they feel they most strongly identify as a student. Then ask them to take a series of 15-20 photos (using a camera or smartphone) over a few days that capture these spaces. Encourage them to consider capturing a variety of spaces and places that cover their range of daily activities, including where they study, live, commute, socialize at night, shop, eat out, or communal spaces in which they spend time around campus.
After collecting your photos, sit down with you research participant and interview them with the help of the photos they have taken. While discussing the images, try to grasp their experiences and perceptions of place, and how space relates to their identity and feelings of belonging. This might also include spaces and places where they feel out of place compared to hegemonic student practices or norms. Reflect on the role that the photos played in your interview and how they managed to represent the area in which they were taken; what do they tell you about your participant’s distinct view of the student life in the city?
Project Option 5: A ‘Sense of Place’ Walking Interview
Drawing from Holton and Riley’s 2014 paper on walking interviews, arrange to walk with a friend to two or three locations in the city that they regularly visit as ‘student spaces’. This can include spaces where they study, live, commute, socialize at night, shop, eat out, or communal spaces in which they spend time around campus. Encourage your interviewee to think about a route that moves between campus (classroom, the Library etc.) and non-campus spaces, but keep the routes you take open in order to replicate as much as possible their ‘natural’ everyday journeys. During your ‘walk’ keep a series of questions and theme in mind regarding the significance and perceptions of the spaces you are moving through – prompt your friend to reflect on the environment they are moving through and practice more spontaneous questioning in light on your interviewee’s responses; what influences their everyday spatial routines? How do they feel about these places at different times of the day? Have the places they frequent shifted over they time (months? years?) at the University? What alternative routes or places are rarely visited, and why?

Compelling correspondence is essential to the achievement all things considered but since of the changing idea of the present working environments, successful correspondence turns out to be more troublesome, and because of the numerous impediments that will permit beneficiaries to acknowledge the plan of the sender It is restricted. Misguided judgments.In spite of the fact that correspondence inside the association is rarely completely open, numerous straightforward arrangements can be executed to advance the effect of these hindrances.

Concerning specific contextual analysis, two significant correspondence standards, correspondence channel determination and commotion are self-evident. This course presents the standards of correspondence, the act of general correspondence, and different speculations to all the more likely comprehend the correspondence exchanges experienced in regular daily existence. The standards and practices that you learn in this course give the premise to additionally learning and correspondence.

This question has been answered

This course starts with an outline of the correspondence cycle, the method of reasoning and hypothesis. In resulting modules of the course, we will look at explicit use of relational connections in close to home and expert life. These incorporate relational correspondence, bunch correspondence and dynamic, authoritative correspondence in the work environment or relational correspondence. Rule of Business Communication In request to make correspondence viable, it is important to follow a few rules and standards. Seven of them are fundamental and applicable, and these are clear, finished, brief, obliging, right, thought to be, concrete. These standards are frequently called 7C for business correspondence. The subtleties of these correspondence standards are examined underneath: Politeness Principle: When conveying, we should build up a cordial relationship with every individual who sends data to us.

To be inviting and polite is indistinguishable, and politeness requires an insightful and amicable activity against others. Axioms are notable that gracious “pay of graciousness is the main thing to win everything”. Correspondence staff ought to consistently remember this. The accompanying standards may assist with improving courtesy:Preliminary considering correspondence with family All glad families have the mystery of progress. This achievement originates from a strong establishment of closeness and closeness. Indeed, through private correspondence these cozy family connections become all the more intently. Correspondence is the foundation of different affiliations, building solid partners of obedient devotion, improving family way of life, and assisting with accomplishing satisfaction (Gosche, p. 1). In any case, so as to keep up an amicable relationship, a few families experienced tumultuous encounters. Correspondence in the family is an intricate and alluring marvel. Correspondence between families isn’t restricted to single messages between families or verbal correspondence.

It is a unique cycle that oversees force, closeness and limits, cohesiveness and flexibility of route frameworks, and makes pictures, topics, stories, ceremonies, rules, jobs, making implications, making a feeling of family life An intelligent cycle that makes a model. This model has passed ages. Notwithstanding the view as a family and family automatic framework, one of the greatest exploration establishments in between family correspondence centers around a family correspondence model. Family correspondence model (FCP) hypothesis clarifies why families impart in their own specific manner dependent on one another ‘s psychological direction. Early FCP research established in media research is keen on how families handle broad communications data. Family correspondence was perceived as an exceptional scholastic exploration field by the National Communications Association in 1989. Family correspondence researchers were at first impacted by family research, social brain science, and relational hypothesis, before long built up the hypothesis and began research in a family framework zeroed in on a significant job. Until 2001, the primary issue of the Family Communication Research Journal, Family Communication Magazine, was given. Family correspondence is more than the field of correspondence analysts in the family. Examination on family correspondence is normally done by individuals in brain science, humanism, and family research, to give some examples models. However, as the popular family correspondence researcher Leslie Baxter stated, it is the focal point of this intelligent semantic creation measure making the grant of family correspondence special. In the field of in-home correspondence, correspondence is normally not founded on autonomous messages from one sender to one beneficiary, yet dependent on the dynamic interdependency of data shared among families It is conceptualized. The focal point of this methodology is on the shared trait of semantic development inside family frameworks. As such, producing doesn’t happen in vacuum, however it happens in a wide scope of ages and social exchange.

Standards are rules end up being followed when performing work to agree to a given objective. Hierarchical achievement relies significantly upon compelling correspondence. So as to successfully impart, it is important to follow a few standards and rules. Coming up next are rules to guarantee powerful correspondence: clearness: lucidity of data is a significant guideline of correspondence. For beneficiaries to know the message plainly, the messages ought to be sorted out in a basic language. To guarantee that beneficiaries can without much of a stretch comprehend the importance of the message, the sender needs to impart unmistakably and unhesitatingly so the beneficiary can plainly and unquestionably comprehend the data.>

How socio-demographic characteristics impact the experience of space and place

Sample Answer

Our Services

Secure Checkout

Our Advantages