How Kurt Baier believe that science and religion

How does Kurt Baier believe that science and religion respond to the question
“Why is there a world at all rather than nothing?” Which approach does he favor,
and why? What does he see as the difficulties of the view he rejects? Why is Baier
not disturbed by the notion that the cosmos and ourselves originated out of
purposeless, natural forces? What counts as a worthwhile life in Baier’s
estimation? Is Baier’s stance convincing? Why or why not? (Make sure to defend
your responses).