HIPAA as it relates to clinical research
Order Description
• Create a comprehensive outline that you will use to write your literature review. The outline should include more than simply topic headings from your concept map;
instead, provide details regarding the peer-reviewed sources under each heading and connections between the findings of the different studies. The length of the
outline may vary depending on your topic area, but it should have enough detail that it is at least 2 pages. Remember that you need to include at least 8 peer-reviewed
scholarly sources that you used in your concept map for this assignment.
• Provide enough detail that a reader may discern the overall ideas that your paper will present. Make sure to use your detailed notes on each source and your concept
map to help you with your assignment.
• The conceptual/theoretical framework is a foundational piece of the dissertation writing process. As you complete this assignment, make sure to note the conceptual
frameworks or theoretical frameworks used by the researchers in your outline.
My topic is “HIPAA as it relates to clinical research”
Kawamoto, K., Lobach, D. F., Willard, H. F., & Ginsburg, G. S. (2009). A national clinical
decision support infrastructure to enable the widespread and consistent practice of
genomic and personalized medicine. BMC medical informatics and decision making,
9(1), 17.
Malin, B., Karp, D., & Scheuermann, R. H. (2010). Technical and Policy Approaches to
Balancing Patient Privacy and Data Sharing in Clinical and Translational Research.
Journal of Investigative Medicine?: the Official Publication of the American
Federation for Clinical Research, 58(1), 11–18. doi:10.231/JIM.0b013e3181c9b2ea
Jiang, X., Sarwate, A. D., & Ohno-Machado, L. (2013). Privacy Technology to Support Data
Sharing for Comparative Effectiveness Research: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW.
El Emam, K., Jabbouri, S., Sams, S., Drouet, Y., & Power, M. (2006). Evaluating Common De-
Identification Heuristics for Personal Health Information. Journal of Medical Internet
Research, 8(4), e28. doi:10.2196/jmir.8.4.e28
Ness RB, Joint Policy Committee, Societies of Epidemiology f. Influence of the HIPAA Privacy
Rule on Health Research. JAMA. 2007;298(18):2164-2170.
doi:10.1001/jama.298.18.2164.
Emanuel, Ezekiel J., and Jerry Menikoff. “Reforming the regulations governing research with
human subjects.” New England Journal of Medicine 365.12 (2011): 1145-1150.
Dunlop, A. L., Graham, T., Leroy, Z., Glanz, K., & Dunlop, B. (2007). The impact of HIPAA
authorization on willingness to participate in clinical research. Annals of
epidemiology, 17(11), 899-905.
Wolf, M. S., & Bennett, C. L. (2006). Local perspective of the impact of the HIPAA privacy rule
on research. Cancer, 106(2), 474-479. Medical Care, 51(8 0 3), S58–S65.
• Create a comprehensive outline that you will use to write your literature review. The outline should include more than simply topic headings from your concept
map; instead, provide details regarding the peer-reviewed sources under each heading and connections between the findings of the different studies. The length of the
outline may vary depending on your topic area, but it should have enough detail that it is at least 2 pages. Remember that you need to include at least 8 peer-reviewed
scholarly sources that you used in your concept map for this assignment.
• Provide enough detail that a reader may discern the overall ideas that your paper will present. Make sure to use your detailed notes on each source and your
concept map to help you with your assignment.
• The conceptual/theoretical framework is a foundational piece of the dissertation writing process. As you complete this assignment, make sure to note the
conceptual frameworks or theoretical frameworks used by the researchers in your outline.
My topic is “HIPAA as it relates to clinical research”
Kawamoto, K., Lobach, D. F., Willard, H. F., & Ginsburg, G. S. (2009). A national clinical
decision support infrastructure to enable the widespread and consistent practice of
genomic and personalized medicine. BMC medical informatics and decision making,
9(1), 17.
Malin, B., Karp, D., & Scheuermann, R. H. (2010). Technical and Policy Approaches to
Balancing Patient Privacy and Data Sharing in Clinical and Translational Research.
Journal of Investigative Medicine?: the Official Publication of the American
Federation for Clinical Research, 58(1), 11–18. doi:10.231/JIM.0b013e3181c9b2ea
Jiang, X., Sarwate, A. D., & Ohno-Machado, L. (2013). Privacy Technology to Support Data
Sharing for Comparative Effectiveness Research: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW.
El Emam, K., Jabbouri, S., Sams, S., Drouet, Y., & Power, M. (2006). Evaluating Common De-
Identification Heuristics for Personal Health Information. Journal of Medical Internet
Research, 8(4), e28. doi:10.2196/jmir.8.4.e28
Ness RB, Joint Policy Committee, Societies of Epidemiology f. Influence of the HIPAA Privacy
Rule on Health Research. JAMA. 2007;298(18):2164-2170.
doi:10.1001/jama.298.18.2164.
Emanuel, Ezekiel J., and Jerry Menikoff. “Reforming the regulations governing research with
human subjects.” New England Journal of Medicine 365.12 (2011): 1145-1150.
Dunlop, A. L., Graham, T., Leroy, Z., Glanz, K., & Dunlop, B. (2007). The impact of HIPAA
authorization on willingness to participate in clinical research. Annals of
epidemiology, 17(11), 899-905.
Wolf, M. S., & Bennett, C. L. (2006). Local perspective of the impact of the HIPAA privacy rule
on research. Cancer, 106(2), 474-479. Medical Care, 51(8 0 3), S58–S65. doi
PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT 🙂
Compelling correspondence is essential to the achievement all things considered but since of the changing idea of the present working environments, successful correspondence turns out to be more troublesome, and because of the numerous impediments that will permit beneficiaries to acknowledge the plan of the sender It is restricted. Misguided judgments.In spite of the fact that correspondence inside the association is rarely completely open, numerous straightforward arrangements can be executed to advance the effect of these hindrances.
Concerning specific contextual analysis, two significant correspondence standards, correspondence channel determination and commotion are self-evident. This course presents the standards of correspondence, the act of general correspondence, and different speculations to all the more likely comprehend the correspondence exchanges experienced in regular daily existence. The standards and practices that you learn in this course give the premise to additionally learning and correspondence.
This course starts with an outline of the correspondence cycle, the method of reasoning and hypothesis. In resulting modules of the course, we will look at explicit use of relational connections in close to home and expert life. These incorporate relational correspondence, bunch correspondence and dynamic, authoritative correspondence in the work environment or relational correspondence. Rule of Business Communication In request to make correspondence viable, it is important to follow a few rules and standards. Seven of them are fundamental and applicable, and these are clear, finished, brief, obliging, right, thought to be, concrete. These standards are frequently called 7C for business correspondence. The subtleties of these correspondence standards are examined underneath: Politeness Principle: When conveying, we should build up a cordial relationship with every individual who sends data to us.
To be inviting and polite is indistinguishable, and politeness requires an insightful and amicable activity against others. Axioms are notable that gracious “pay of graciousness is the main thing to win everything”. Correspondence staff ought to consistently remember this. The accompanying standards may assist with improving courtesy:Preliminary considering correspondence with family All glad families have the mystery of progress. This achievement originates from a strong establishment of closeness and closeness. Indeed, through private correspondence these cozy family connections become all the more intently. Correspondence is the foundation of different affiliations, building solid partners of obedient devotion, improving family way of life, and assisting with accomplishing satisfaction (Gosche, p. 1). In any case, so as to keep up an amicable relationship, a few families experienced tumultuous encounters. Correspondence in the family is an intricate and alluring marvel. Correspondence between families isn’t restricted to single messages between families or verbal correspondence.
It is a unique cycle that oversees force, closeness and limits, cohesiveness and flexibility of route frameworks, and makes pictures, topics, stories, ceremonies, rules, jobs, making implications, making a feeling of family life An intelligent cycle that makes a model. This model has passed ages. Notwithstanding the view as a family and family automatic framework, one of the greatest exploration establishments in between family correspondence centers around a family correspondence model. Family correspondence model (FCP) hypothesis clarifies why families impart in their own specific manner dependent on one another ‘s psychological direction. Early FCP research established in media research is keen on how families handle broad communications data. Family correspondence was perceived as an exceptional scholastic exploration field by the National Communications Association in 1989. Family correspondence researchers were at first impacted by family research, social brain science, and relational hypothesis, before long built up the hypothesis and began research in a family framework zeroed in on a significant job. Until 2001, the primary issue of the Family Communication Research Journal, Family Communication Magazine, was given. Family correspondence is more than the field of correspondence analysts in the family. Examination on family correspondence is normally done by individuals in brain science, humanism, and family research, to give some examples models. However, as the popular family correspondence researcher Leslie Baxter stated, it is the focal point of this intelligent semantic creation measure making the grant of family correspondence special. In the field of in-home correspondence, correspondence is normally not founded on autonomous messages from one sender to one beneficiary, yet dependent on the dynamic interdependency of data shared among families It is conceptualized. The focal point of this methodology is on the shared trait of semantic development inside family frameworks. As such, producing doesn’t happen in vacuum, however it happens in a wide scope of ages and social exchange.
Standards are rules end up being followed when performing work to agree to a given objective. Hierarchical achievement relies significantly upon compelling correspondence. So as to successfully impart, it is important to follow a few standards and rules. Coming up next are rules to guarantee powerful correspondence: clearness: lucidity of data is a significant guideline of correspondence. For beneficiaries to know the message plainly, the messages ought to be sorted out in a basic language. To guarantee that beneficiaries can without much of a stretch comprehend the importance of the message, the sender needs to impart unmistakably and unhesitatingly so the beneficiary can plainly and unquestionably comprehend the data.>