Health Ed Assignment 3 - Webliography - Analyzing Health Information

Health Ed Assignment 3 – Webliography – Analyzing Health Information

Project description
Evaluating Health Information on the Internet

http://vizedhtmlcontent.next.ecollege.com/CurrentCourse/Evaluating%20Health%20Information.docx

Purpose:
Review, assess and compare and contrast sources of health information on the Internet for reliability. The Internet offers a wide array of information about health and caring for ones health. It is important to learn to evaluate information on the net.

Instructions:

DIRECTIONS: PART A
1. Complete this tutorial from the National Library of Medicine. You may need to watch it more than once. http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/webeval/webeval.html

2. Review each of the health information sites listed.

3. Locate one Internet source that provides information about health or caring for ones health. You may choose to use Appendix C in your textbook to find an Internet source. The Internet site should be related to one of the following Content Areas: nutrition, growth& development, emotional health, alcohol, tobacco and other drugs, communicable and chronic diseases, or environmental health. Your first step will be to search the Internet for the relevant site.

4. You will then review and evaluate the sites. Using the Internet evaluation tool provided, evaluate the sites. Using the scoring key below, indicate the extent to which each site meets the criteria for a credible source of health information. In the Documentation column, write what about the sites lead you to your conclusion. Type your answers into the template.
Scoring Key
4: Meets all criteria
3: Meets most criteria
2: Meets some criteria
1: Doesnt meet criteria

DIRECTIONS: PART B
Write a summary of the analysis made – For each site, indicate

1. What was an aha moment or something new you learned from this website, such as a statistic, fact, or other knowledge?
2. Summary of your evaluation of this website:

DIRECTIONS: PART C- COMPARE AND CONTRAST REPORT
Compare and contrast the three sites. List strengths and weaknesses of each. State your personal assessment of the sites including the usefulness and/or ease of using them. Justify your claims with data from your analysis. The paper should be 2-3 pages in length, typed, double-spaced, exclusive of references. Paper must follow APA format in headings, citations, and references

Site #1
http://www.webmd.com/cold-and-flu/cold-guide/zinc-lozenges-cold-remedy?page=%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%202

Scoring

Criteria
4
3
2
1
Documentation
EXAMPLE:
Quality

The date of the last posting was 2001
Provider
Run by experts in the field
Clearly stated purpose
Contact information provided

Funding
Doesnt favor sponsor
Ads are clearly labeled
Ads are separate from the article/information

Quality
Editorial policy available
Expert source of data
Current
References posted
No product claims

Privacy
Personal information not requested.
If requested, states how used

ANALYSIS

What was an aha moment or something new you learned from this website, such as a statistic, fact, or other knowledge?

Summary of your evaluation of this website

Site #2: http://www.cdc.gov/healthyyouth/obesity/facts.htm

Scoring

Criteria
4
3
2
1
Documentation
EXAMPLE:
Quality

The date of the last posting was 2001
Provider
Run by experts in the field
Clearly stated purpose
Contact information provided

2. Funding
Doesnt favor sponsor
Ads are clearly labeled
Ads are separate from the article/information

3. Quality
Editorial policy available
Expert source of data
Current
References posted
No product claims

Privacy
Personal information not requested.
If requested, states how used

ANALYSIS

What was an aha moment or something new you learned from this website, such as a statistic, fact, or other knowledge?

Summary of your evaluation of this website

Site # 3
Directions:
Select a health topic of your choosing.
Search the Internet for one source of information about the topic.
Complete the table below, making sure to include the URL for the source of information you reviewed.
URL:

Scoring

Criteria
4
3
2
1
Documentation
EXAMPLE:
Quality

The date of the last posting was 2001
Provider
Run by experts in the field
Clearly stated purpose
Contact information provided

2. Funding
Doesnt favor sponsor
Ads are clearly labeled
Ads are separate from the article/information

Quality
Editorial policy available
Expert source of data
Current
References posted
No product claims

Privacy
Personal information not requested.
If requested, states how used

ANALYSIS

What was an aha moment or something new you learned from this website, such as a statistic, fact, or other knowledge?

Summary of your evaluation of this website

RUBRIC – EVALUATION OF HEALTH WEBSITE

Criteria & scoring

Marginal
0
Acceptable
1
Commendable
2
Outstanding
3
PART 1 Evaluation completed
X 3
1 per site
Content area incomplete or not attached
No analysis shared
Content area attached
Analysis generic and with few or no examples to support ideas, Demonstrates little thought, minimally complete.

Content area complete and attached. Analysis specific with examples used to support. The response has details and thought.

Content area detailed and attached. Analysis specific and connected with examples used to support. The response has details and demonstrates a great deal of thought.
PART II
Analysis of site
X 2
.65 per site
Evaluation tool incomplete or not attached
No analysis shared
Evaluation tool attached
Analysis generic and with few or no examples to support ideas, Demonstrates little thought, minimally complete.

Evaluation tool complete and attached
Analysis specific with examples used to support. The response has details and thought.

Evaluation tool detailed and attached. Analysis specific and connected with examples used to support. The response has details and demonstrates a great deal of thought.
PART III
Written Summary each site
X 2
.65 per site
Knowledge and comprehension are evident. Organization is lacking. Details should be added.Greater clarity or accuracy is needed in the explanation
Knowledge and comprehension are evident. Organization is evident. Most ideas are clearly identified, interpreted, applied, explained and/or critiqued

Some higher order thinking is evident. Organization is evident. Most ideas are clearly identified, interpreted, applied, explained and/or critiqued
Accurate explanation, issues and use shared.
Higher order thinking is evident and presented in a clear logical flow. Insightful and thorough interpretation, application, explanation, and/or critique of ideas. Clear, precise, accurate, and detailed explanation, issues and use shared fully.
Part IIII
Compare and contract
X2

Knowledge and comprehension are evident. Organization is lacking. Details should be added.Greater clarity or accuracy is needed in the explanation
Knowledge and comprehension are evident. Organization is evident. Most ideas are clearly identified, interpreted, applied, explained and/or critiqued

X 1

Writing is unstructured, lacking paragraph order, transitions missing
Many spelling and punctuation errors, many sentence fragments / run-ons.

PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT 🙂

Compelling correspondence is essential to the achievement all things considered but since of the changing idea of the present working environments, successful correspondence turns out to be more troublesome, and because of the numerous impediments that will permit beneficiaries to acknowledge the plan of the sender It is restricted. Misguided judgments.In spite of the fact that correspondence inside the association is rarely completely open, numerous straightforward arrangements can be executed to advance the effect of these hindrances.

Concerning specific contextual analysis, two significant correspondence standards, correspondence channel determination and commotion are self-evident. This course presents the standards of correspondence, the act of general correspondence, and different speculations to all the more likely comprehend the correspondence exchanges experienced in regular daily existence. The standards and practices that you learn in this course give the premise to additionally learning and correspondence.

This question has been answered

This course starts with an outline of the correspondence cycle, the method of reasoning and hypothesis. In resulting modules of the course, we will look at explicit use of relational connections in close to home and expert life. These incorporate relational correspondence, bunch correspondence and dynamic, authoritative correspondence in the work environment or relational correspondence. Rule of Business Communication In request to make correspondence viable, it is important to follow a few rules and standards. Seven of them are fundamental and applicable, and these are clear, finished, brief, obliging, right, thought to be, concrete. These standards are frequently called 7C for business correspondence. The subtleties of these correspondence standards are examined underneath: Politeness Principle: When conveying, we should build up a cordial relationship with every individual who sends data to us.

To be inviting and polite is indistinguishable, and politeness requires an insightful and amicable activity against others. Axioms are notable that gracious “pay of graciousness is the main thing to win everything”. Correspondence staff ought to consistently remember this. The accompanying standards may assist with improving courtesy:Preliminary considering correspondence with family All glad families have the mystery of progress. This achievement originates from a strong establishment of closeness and closeness. Indeed, through private correspondence these cozy family connections become all the more intently. Correspondence is the foundation of different affiliations, building solid partners of obedient devotion, improving family way of life, and assisting with accomplishing satisfaction (Gosche, p. 1). In any case, so as to keep up an amicable relationship, a few families experienced tumultuous encounters. Correspondence in the family is an intricate and alluring marvel. Correspondence between families isn’t restricted to single messages between families or verbal correspondence.

It is a unique cycle that oversees force, closeness and limits, cohesiveness and flexibility of route frameworks, and makes pictures, topics, stories, ceremonies, rules, jobs, making implications, making a feeling of family life An intelligent cycle that makes a model. This model has passed ages. Notwithstanding the view as a family and family automatic framework, one of the greatest exploration establishments in between family correspondence centers around a family correspondence model. Family correspondence model (FCP) hypothesis clarifies why families impart in their own specific manner dependent on one another ‘s psychological direction. Early FCP research established in media research is keen on how families handle broad communications data. Family correspondence was perceived as an exceptional scholastic exploration field by the National Communications Association in 1989. Family correspondence researchers were at first impacted by family research, social brain science, and relational hypothesis, before long built up the hypothesis and began research in a family framework zeroed in on a significant job. Until 2001, the primary issue of the Family Communication Research Journal, Family Communication Magazine, was given. Family correspondence is more than the field of correspondence analysts in the family. Examination on family correspondence is normally done by individuals in brain science, humanism, and family research, to give some examples models. However, as the popular family correspondence researcher Leslie Baxter stated, it is the focal point of this intelligent semantic creation measure making the grant of family correspondence special. In the field of in-home correspondence, correspondence is normally not founded on autonomous messages from one sender to one beneficiary, yet dependent on the dynamic interdependency of data shared among families It is conceptualized. The focal point of this methodology is on the shared trait of semantic development inside family frameworks. As such, producing doesn’t happen in vacuum, however it happens in a wide scope of ages and social exchange.

Standards are rules end up being followed when performing work to agree to a given objective. Hierarchical achievement relies significantly upon compelling correspondence. So as to successfully impart, it is important to follow a few standards and rules. Coming up next are rules to guarantee powerful correspondence: clearness: lucidity of data is a significant guideline of correspondence. For beneficiaries to know the message plainly, the messages ought to be sorted out in a basic language. To guarantee that beneficiaries can without much of a stretch comprehend the importance of the message, the sender needs to impart unmistakably and unhesitatingly so the beneficiary can plainly and unquestionably comprehend the data.>

Health Ed Assignment 3 – Webliography – Analyzing Health Information

Sample Answer

Our Services

Secure Checkout

Our Advantages