Health Analysis

First clinical and the second is preclinical.
Clinical meaning experiments that were done on human. Whereas preclinical that done on animals.
The preclinical experiments are divided into ex-vivo, and in vivo when it comes to DTI in myocardium infarction. So talk about both—ex-vivo and the in vivo.
The clinical part will be focusing on in-vivo; there is only one paper that studied ex-vivo in human.
So things that need to be cover for example what is the finding, for example, some paper found that the mean diffusivity MD increased by 2% in the infarct area, other paper found a similar value, about 1%, Infract zone changed in the present of myocardium infarction by 3%. What parameter that they used. And what is the difference between other studies? What is the methodology that they used to carry out the study? Also, what is challenging? Did they resolve it or not. Briefly mention how many heart segments they used and how. How did they extract the heart,
Also compare between the acute and chronic myocardium infarction, I attached a paper that talked about it.
By the end of writing, these two parts come up with a paragraph that talks about limitation and possible future work. Please write accurately and cite everything that you write.
Also shows why it's important to do the DTI to detect myocardium infarction.