Overview
You may find this assignment to be more vaguely defined than others that you have encountered previously. This is
deliberate, as the goal of this assignment is to foster your exploration of diverse perspectives and challenge you
intellectually.
Learning Outcomes
This assignment is intended to help you learn to do the following:
⢠Discuss key facets of economics in global healthcare.
⢠Consider ethical implications for global healthcare decision-making.
Action Items- IMPORTANT: (Part # 1 â with 4 References) 1 PAGE
- Review 3 of your peers' Adobe web pages from the Country Profile Research
assignments for the current module. (Depending on the size of your class, you should
review three different peers' posts from module to module.) - Consider the major course topics for this module:
a. Key facets of economics in global healthcare
b. Ethical implications for global healthcare decision-making - With these topics in mind, consider what you read in your peersâ posts and write about
the following:
a. Describe emerging regional and global health patterns that you observed.
b. Describe ongoing or apparently "unsolvable" global health problems that
you observed.
c. Describe the similarities and differences of the economic, social, cultural,
and/or political challenges that you observed.
d. Describe the global health commonalities between the two countries you
researched and those your peers researched. - In no less than 450 words, write about your observations and post it in the appropriate
discussion topic.
a. Follow all applicable regarding APA in-text citations and list of cited references.
Failure to properly cite and reference sources constitutes plagiarism.
b. Proofread your document carefully. Improper English grammar, sentence
structure, punctuation, or spelling will result in significant grading deductions.
GLOBAL HEALTHCARE
Reply Action Items: (Part # 2-)- (with 4 References- 2 references for each peer)- 1 PAGE - Read through the discussion posts submitted by your peers.
- Respond to at least 2 peer other discussion posts. Each of your responses should be no
less than 125 words, and should provide meaningful insights, suggestions, and questions.
Consider the following prompts to frame your response:
a. Which ideas or thoughts did your peer share that you found interesting or
insightful? How did these ideas or thoughts inform your own thinking?
b. Were there areas in your peer's discussion post where you noted logical gaps
or contradictions? (e.g., âIâm not sure I understand how you came to the
conclusions thatâ¦â)
c. Are there any sections that you think your peer could expound upon? (e.g.
âIâd really like to hear more about how you think political corruption is a
primary factor in this case.â)
d. What thoughts or questions does your peer's response trigger for you?
e. Follow all applicable regarding APA in-text citations and list of cited references.
Failure to properly cite and reference sources constitutes plagiarism.
f. Proofread your document carefully. Improper English grammar, sentence
structure, punctuation, or spelling will result in significant grading deductions.