{br} STUCK with your assignment? {br} When is it due? {br} Get FREE assistance. Page Title: {title}{br} Page URL: {url}
UK: +44 748 007-0908, USA: +1 917 810-5386 [email protected]
Select Page

Question 1
(a) Let A, B, C and D be the following statements:
A: Andrew comes for the exam.
B: Bryan comes for the exam.
C: Charles comes for the exam.
D: Daniel comes for the exam.
Write the following compound sentences using logical connectives:
(i) If Daniel comes for the exam, then if Charles doesn’t come then Andrew come
for the exam.
(ii) Charles comes for the exam provided that Daniel doesn’t come, but if Daniel
comes, then Bryan doesn’t come.
(5 marks)
(b) Let , and r be the following statements:
f: The brick is falling
a: The brick is above me
r: I run
(i) Write the following argument using , and r and logical connectives:
If the brick is falling and above me, then I will run.
The brick is falling.
The brick is not above me.
Therefore, I will not run.
(ii) Employ a truth table to test the validity of the above argument.
(11 marks)
MTH105 Tutor-Marked Assignment
SINGAPORE UNIVERSITY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES (SUSS) Page 3 of 5
(c) Construct a chain of logical connectives to show that (p ∧ q) ∧ [(q ∧ ¬r) ∨ (p ∧ r)] is
logically equivalent to ¬(p → ¬q).
Do not use truth tables here and give a reason for each line.
(8 marks)
Question 2
(a) Consider the following statement:
There is at least a student in SUSS who has not visited the National Library or visited
Changi Airport.
Let S(x), N(x) and C(x) be the predicates “x is an SUSS student” and “x has visited
the National Library” and “x has visited Changi Airport” respectively.
(i) Rewrite the statements using the predicates S(x), N(x) and C(x) together with
the universal and/or existential quantifier.
(ii) Write the negation of the statement using the predicates S(x), N(x) and C(x)
together with the universal and/or existential quantifier.
(6 marks)
(b) Use the rules of inference to show the validity of the following argument. Give a
reason for each line of your proof.
x, (F(x)  G(x)) x, (F(x)  H(x)) x, (H(x)  I(x)) x, (G(x)  I(x))
(9 marks)
Question 3
(a) (i) State the contrapositive of the following statement:
Let . If
3 2 3 2
y  yx  x  xy
, then
y  x .
(ii) Use the method of proof by contrapositive to prove the above statement.
(7 marks)
(b) Use a suitable method to prove that there are no rational solution to the equation
1 0
3
x  x  
or give a counter-example to show otherwise.

Compelling correspondence is essential to the achievement all things considered but since of the changing idea of the present working environments, successful correspondence turns out to be more troublesome, and because of the numerous impediments that will permit beneficiaries to acknowledge the plan of the sender It is restricted. Misguided judgments.In spite of the fact that correspondence inside the association is rarely completely open, numerous straightforward arrangements can be executed to advance the effect of these hindrances.

Concerning specific contextual analysis, two significant correspondence standards, correspondence channel determination and commotion are self-evident. This course presents the standards of correspondence, the act of general correspondence, and different speculations to all the more likely comprehend the correspondence exchanges experienced in regular daily existence. The standards and practices that you learn in this course give the premise to additionally learning and correspondence.

This course starts with an outline of the correspondence cycle, the method of reasoning and hypothesis. In resulting modules of the course, we will look at explicit use of relational connections in close to home and expert life. These incorporate relational correspondence, bunch correspondence and dynamic, authoritative correspondence in the work environment or relational correspondence. Rule of Business Communication In request to make correspondence viable, it is important to follow a few rules and standards. Seven of them are fundamental and applicable, and these are clear, finished, brief, obliging, right, thought to be, concrete. These standards are frequently called 7C for business correspondence. The subtleties of these correspondence standards are examined underneath: Politeness Principle: When conveying, we should build up a cordial relationship with every individual who sends data to us.

To be inviting and polite is indistinguishable, and politeness requires an insightful and amicable activity against others. Axioms are notable that gracious “pay of graciousness is the main thing to win everything”. Correspondence staff ought to consistently remember this. The accompanying standards may assist with improving courtesy:Preliminary considering correspondence with family All glad families have the mystery of progress. This achievement originates from a strong establishment of closeness and closeness. Indeed, through private correspondence these cozy family connections become all the more intently. Correspondence is the foundation of different affiliations, building solid partners of obedient devotion, improving family way of life, and assisting with accomplishing satisfaction (Gosche, p. 1). In any case, so as to keep up an amicable relationship, a few families experienced tumultuous encounters. Correspondence in the family is an intricate and alluring marvel. Correspondence between families isn’t restricted to single messages between families or verbal correspondence.

It is a unique cycle that oversees force, closeness and limits, cohesiveness and flexibility of route frameworks, and makes pictures, topics, stories, ceremonies, rules, jobs, making implications, making a feeling of family life An intelligent cycle that makes a model. This model has passed ages. Notwithstanding the view as a family and family automatic framework, one of the greatest exploration establishments in between family correspondence centers around a family correspondence model. Family correspondence model (FCP) hypothesis clarifies why families impart in their own specific manner dependent on one another ‘s psychological direction. Early FCP research established in media research is keen on how families handle broad communications data. Family correspondence was perceived as an exceptional scholastic exploration field by the National Communications Association in 1989. Family correspondence researchers were at first impacted by family research, social brain science, and relational hypothesis, before long built up the hypothesis and began research in a family framework zeroed in on a significant job. Until 2001, the primary issue of the Family Communication Research Journal, Family Communication Magazine, was given. Family correspondence is more than the field of correspondence analysts in the family. Examination on family correspondence is normally done by individuals in brain science, humanism, and family research, to give some examples models. However, as the popular family correspondence researcher Leslie Baxter stated, it is the focal point of this intelligent semantic creation measure making the grant of family correspondence special. In the field of in-home correspondence, correspondence is normally not founded on autonomous messages from one sender to one beneficiary, yet dependent on the dynamic interdependency of data shared among families It is conceptualized. The focal point of this methodology is on the shared trait of semantic development inside family frameworks. As such, producing doesn’t happen in vacuum, however it happens in a wide scope of ages and social exchange.

Standards are rules end up being followed when performing work to agree to a given objective. Hierarchical achievement relies significantly upon compelling correspondence. So as to successfully impart, it is important to follow a few standards and rules. Coming up next are rules to guarantee powerful correspondence: clearness: lucidity of data is a significant guideline of correspondence. For beneficiaries to know the message plainly, the messages ought to be sorted out in a basic language. To guarantee that beneficiaries can without much of a stretch comprehend the importance of the message, the sender needs to impart unmistakably and unhesitatingly so the beneficiary can plainly and unquestionably comprehend the data.>