FRAUD U.S. Food & Drug Administration

Paper instructions:
Week 3: FRAUD DISCUSSION

Post your answers to the following questions in the Fraud Discussion on Carmen Discussions. Please post your
answers in the actual discussion and NOT in an attached document (2 points will be deducted for posting
answers in an attached document). Also, for ease of reading for other students, please use the name of the
dishonest seller/business/person as your post title (ex. Madoff).
Before completing this assignment, students are expected to read the assigned articles for Week 3 and
view/listen to the lecture for Week 3 (Content section of Carmen).
1) Provide a summary (approximately 250-350 words) of an instance of fraud or a rip-off that you have
experienced, know about, or have researched. Please read through each of the items below before
deciding an example. Provide website links for your research. Include the following information in
your summary:
a. State the name of the seller and explain in detail how the scheme works. If you do not know the
name of the seller/business/person, please choose a different example.
b. Is this a fraud or rip-off? Explain. Note: The weekly lecture provides definitions for fraud and rip-off.
c. Does the seller have a website? If so, what tactics have been employed to make the seller appear
more legitimate?
? Example: Pictures of the president and American flag on the website
d. What marketing techniques has the seller used?
? Examples: Email, direct mail, referrals, etc.
e. Does this scheme target a certain group of people?
? Examples: Elderly, baby boomers, teens, religious group, ethnic group, socioeconomic
group, etc.
f. Has the seller had any complaints or legal actions taken against them? If so, provide a summary.
Consider using the following resources (if applicable) to research your answer:
? Google
? Better Business Bureau website (http://www.bbb.org/)
? U.S. Food & Drug Administration website
(http://www.fda.gov/ForConsumers/ProtectYourself/HealthFraud/default.htm)
? NASD’s BrokerCheck service (http://www.finra.org/index.htm)
? Federal Trade Commission website (http://ftc.gov/)

Week 3: FRAUD DISCUSSION
Post your answers to the following questions in the Fraud Discussion on Carmen Discussions. Please post your
answers in the actual discussion and NOT in an attached document (2 points will be deducted for posting
answers in an attached document). Also, for ease of reading for other students, please use the name of the
dishonest seller/business/person as your post title (ex. Madoff).
Before completing this assignment, students are expected to read the assigned articles for Week 3 and
view/listen to the lecture for Week 3 (Content section of Carmen).
1) Provide a summary (approximately 250-350 words) of an instance of fraud or a rip-off that you have
experienced, know about, or have researched. Please read through each of the items below before
deciding an example. Provide website links for your research. Include the following information in
your summary:
a. State the name of the seller and explain in detail how the scheme works. If you do not know the
name of the seller/business/person, please choose a different example.
b. Is this a fraud or rip-off? Explain. Note: The weekly lecture provides definitions for fraud and rip-off.
c. Does the seller have a website? If so, what tactics have been employed to make the seller appear
more legitimate?
? Example: Pictures of the president and American flag on the website
d. What marketing techniques has the seller used?
? Examples: Email, direct mail, referrals, etc.
e. Does this scheme target a certain group of people?
? Examples: Elderly, baby boomers, teens, religious group, ethnic group, socioeconomic
group, etc.
f. Has the seller had any complaints or legal actions taken against them? If so, provide a summary.
Consider using the following resources (if applicable) to research your answer:
? Google
? Better Business Bureau website (http://www.bbb.org/)
? U.S. Food & Drug Administration website
(http://www.fda.gov/ForConsumers/ProtectYourself/HealthFraud/default.htm )
? NASD’s BrokerCheck service (http://www.finra.org/index.htm)
? Federal Trade Commission website (http://ftc.gov/)
Fraud Discussion Post: Grading Criteria
10 points ? Post contains appropriate content for given assignment and is thoughtful, analytical, and
original. Post meets or exceeds word count for assignment. Well structured, logically
sequenced sentences, written in formal language. Free of grammatical/spelling errors.
Post references website links for the information provided.
7 points ? Post contains appropriate content for given assignment. Demonstrates key concepts but
analysis is not fully developed. Post meets or almost meets word count. Sentence
structure is present but organization of ideas is somewhat sporadic. A few
grammatical/spelling errors. Post references website links for most of the information
provided.
4 points ? Post is short and lacks insight or depth. Lacks sentence structure and/or flow. Written in
informal language (using abbreviations or text lingo). Poor spelling and many
grammatical/spelling errors. Post lacks references for information provided.
Extra Credit*: Respond to another student’s posting.
Reply Post
1) Provide some reasons why you think this type of rip-off or fraud exists in the marketplace.
2) What kind of effect has it had on consumers and/or society (monetary, emotional, etc.)?
3) Provide realistic and reasonable solutions to help thwart or eliminate this type of fraud or rip-off.
Reply Post: Grading Criteria
2 points
extra credit
? Reply post shows a high level of insight, depth, and understanding relevant to topic.
Personal opinion is expressed in a respectful manner and is clearly related to the original
post. Free of grammatical/spelling errors.
1 points
extra credit
? Reply post shows some insight and understanding relevant to topic. Personal opinion is
expressed in a respectful manner but relationship to original post is somewhat weak.
Some grammatical/spelling errors.
0.5 points
extra credit
? Reply post shows little understanding of the original post. Written in informal language
(using abbreviations or text lingo). Poor spelling and many grammatical/spelling errors.
*Review syllabus policy for extra credit:
Extra credit: Students may earn extra credit points for responding thoughtfully to other students in Carmen discussion assignments.
Points earned range from 0.50 – 2 points per Carmen discussion topic. Since there are a total of 4 discussions over semester, students
have the opportunity to earn a total of 8 extra credit points. Due dates for discussions are listed in the syllabus. Original posts and
responses must be posted before discussion due date.

PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT 🙂

Compelling correspondence is essential to the achievement all things considered but since of the changing idea of the present working environments, successful correspondence turns out to be more troublesome, and because of the numerous impediments that will permit beneficiaries to acknowledge the plan of the sender It is restricted. Misguided judgments.In spite of the fact that correspondence inside the association is rarely completely open, numerous straightforward arrangements can be executed to advance the effect of these hindrances.

Concerning specific contextual analysis, two significant correspondence standards, correspondence channel determination and commotion are self-evident. This course presents the standards of correspondence, the act of general correspondence, and different speculations to all the more likely comprehend the correspondence exchanges experienced in regular daily existence. The standards and practices that you learn in this course give the premise to additionally learning and correspondence.

This question has been answered

This course starts with an outline of the correspondence cycle, the method of reasoning and hypothesis. In resulting modules of the course, we will look at explicit use of relational connections in close to home and expert life. These incorporate relational correspondence, bunch correspondence and dynamic, authoritative correspondence in the work environment or relational correspondence. Rule of Business Communication In request to make correspondence viable, it is important to follow a few rules and standards. Seven of them are fundamental and applicable, and these are clear, finished, brief, obliging, right, thought to be, concrete. These standards are frequently called 7C for business correspondence. The subtleties of these correspondence standards are examined underneath: Politeness Principle: When conveying, we should build up a cordial relationship with every individual who sends data to us.

To be inviting and polite is indistinguishable, and politeness requires an insightful and amicable activity against others. Axioms are notable that gracious “pay of graciousness is the main thing to win everything”. Correspondence staff ought to consistently remember this. The accompanying standards may assist with improving courtesy:Preliminary considering correspondence with family All glad families have the mystery of progress. This achievement originates from a strong establishment of closeness and closeness. Indeed, through private correspondence these cozy family connections become all the more intently. Correspondence is the foundation of different affiliations, building solid partners of obedient devotion, improving family way of life, and assisting with accomplishing satisfaction (Gosche, p. 1). In any case, so as to keep up an amicable relationship, a few families experienced tumultuous encounters. Correspondence in the family is an intricate and alluring marvel. Correspondence between families isn’t restricted to single messages between families or verbal correspondence.

It is a unique cycle that oversees force, closeness and limits, cohesiveness and flexibility of route frameworks, and makes pictures, topics, stories, ceremonies, rules, jobs, making implications, making a feeling of family life An intelligent cycle that makes a model. This model has passed ages. Notwithstanding the view as a family and family automatic framework, one of the greatest exploration establishments in between family correspondence centers around a family correspondence model. Family correspondence model (FCP) hypothesis clarifies why families impart in their own specific manner dependent on one another ‘s psychological direction. Early FCP research established in media research is keen on how families handle broad communications data. Family correspondence was perceived as an exceptional scholastic exploration field by the National Communications Association in 1989. Family correspondence researchers were at first impacted by family research, social brain science, and relational hypothesis, before long built up the hypothesis and began research in a family framework zeroed in on a significant job. Until 2001, the primary issue of the Family Communication Research Journal, Family Communication Magazine, was given. Family correspondence is more than the field of correspondence analysts in the family. Examination on family correspondence is normally done by individuals in brain science, humanism, and family research, to give some examples models. However, as the popular family correspondence researcher Leslie Baxter stated, it is the focal point of this intelligent semantic creation measure making the grant of family correspondence special. In the field of in-home correspondence, correspondence is normally not founded on autonomous messages from one sender to one beneficiary, yet dependent on the dynamic interdependency of data shared among families It is conceptualized. The focal point of this methodology is on the shared trait of semantic development inside family frameworks. As such, producing doesn’t happen in vacuum, however it happens in a wide scope of ages and social exchange.

Standards are rules end up being followed when performing work to agree to a given objective. Hierarchical achievement relies significantly upon compelling correspondence. So as to successfully impart, it is important to follow a few standards and rules. Coming up next are rules to guarantee powerful correspondence: clearness: lucidity of data is a significant guideline of correspondence. For beneficiaries to know the message plainly, the messages ought to be sorted out in a basic language. To guarantee that beneficiaries can without much of a stretch comprehend the importance of the message, the sender needs to impart unmistakably and unhesitatingly so the beneficiary can plainly and unquestionably comprehend the data.>

FRAUD U.S. Food & Drug Administration

Sample Answer

Our Services

Secure Checkout

Our Advantages