FOIA and Privatization of Government
no source please write a small nice response comment to the the below that you agree. Just need a response to what the person below wrote.
The Freedom of Information Act of 1966 (FIOA) has been perceived as a way for government to provide transparency and disclosure (within reason) to citizen’s information. This act essentially protects the rights and civil liberties of the public in making information accessible and allowing misinformation regarding individuals to be rectified. However, through government effort to become more transparent with citizens information privatization which is basically the outsourcing of governmental functions such as garbage collection, private schools and ambulance etc. has assisted in the diminishing of the use of FOIA due its use at the executive branch level. This paper will discuss whether private corporation should be subjected to FIOA rules and regulation regarding transparency. Discuss whether there should be a difference between privatization and traditional service. Examine cases of FWAC and lastly explore if legislature can force private corporations to respond to requests for information.
Should private corporations be subject to FOIA requests if they utilize public funding? What are the arguments for and against this?
Private companies should be subjected to the FOIA request if they utilize public funding because functions need to be accessible to the public especially if the funds provided through taxes. According to an article entitled Confusion in the Courts. The author conveys stakeholders views on accessing records through privatization “ These can be fact specific, but I think there’s a commonsensical way of performing whether they’re providing a function of government as opposed to service….a record that reflects what government or public monies are being used for… as opposed to a private board meeting about the running of the company(Confusion in the Court p 12).” The author believes that some functions should be provided under the FOIA and each company issue regarding disclosure will be held on a case by case basic, some information is at is imperative for the public to know should be disclosed.
Should there be differences between privatization of traditional governmental services (law enforcement, the prison system, transportation) and private corporations using public funding for non-traditional services (providing day care to the children of government employees, meals-on-wheels)?
Yes there should be differences between privatization of traditional government services and private corporations using public funding. If the people in the area are willing to pay for additional service that they feel would be beneficial then should. For instance some areas have additional taxing that help provide a better education for children who live in that area. If the tax payers are willing to pay the extra cost for better service they should be allowed to in an article by Guilbert C. Hentschke and Priscilla Wohlstetter entitled K-12 Education in a Broader Privatization Context takes a closer look at both sides of educational privatization:
“Both advocates and opponents of privatization in education tend to approach the issue through an ideological lens. In general, pro-privatization advocates tout its benefits for improving the cost-effectiveness, responsiveness, and innovation of public education services, while anti-privatization advocates lament the probable degradation, unequalizing effects, and even loss of those same public services with the advent of privatization. The debate over privatization benefits from the analytical, empirically guided appraisals presented in this volume and is especially timely (Hentschke 297).”
Although this article is geared towards education it can transcend over the whole scope of why privatization is effect as a whole. The positive attributes such as responsiveness and services geared towards your community proves to out weight the cost of services.
Try to find examples of FWAC in private corporations and non-profits that were not subject to FOIA, but may have been prevented by FOIA based investigations.
Some examples of FWAC in private corporations and non profits that were not subjected to FOIA include Michelle Rhee May who was reportedly involved in a test score scandal. The second example is post 9/11 contractors who were inflating the price of products they claim to have purchased. The last example is the CityTime scandal where contractors were hired to assist clocking work hour and the contracted companies ended up steals millions by inflating cost. In all of these examples since there was no oversight or accountability provided by governmental agencies under the FIOA companies were able to scam, and deceive the general public.
If FOIA/FOIL legislation cannot force private corporations to respond to requests for information, is there anything that could be done by the contracting government agency to mitigate this?
I doubt anything can be done since the private corporations are protected under that act. Unless there is an executive order from the president stating that private corporations must exercise extreme oversight and hold them accountable with stiff fines and penalties for companies deceiving the general public. Until those changes are made legislation do not have much input on protecting themselves against fraud, waste abuse and corruption.
Confusion in the courts. (2007). News Media & the Law, 31(3), 10-12.
Hentschke, G. C., & Wohlstetter, P. (2007). Conclusion-K-12 Education in a Broader Privatization Context. Educational Policy, 21(1), 297-307. doi:10.1177/089590486298642
PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT 🙂
Compelling correspondence is essential to the achievement all things considered but since of the changing idea of the present working environments, successful correspondence turns out to be more troublesome, and because of the numerous impediments that will permit beneficiaries to acknowledge the plan of the sender It is restricted. Misguided judgments.In spite of the fact that correspondence inside the association is rarely completely open, numerous straightforward arrangements can be executed to advance the effect of these hindrances.
Concerning specific contextual analysis, two significant correspondence standards, correspondence channel determination and commotion are self-evident. This course presents the standards of correspondence, the act of general correspondence, and different speculations to all the more likely comprehend the correspondence exchanges experienced in regular daily existence. The standards and practices that you learn in this course give the premise to additionally learning and correspondence.
This course starts with an outline of the correspondence cycle, the method of reasoning and hypothesis. In resulting modules of the course, we will look at explicit use of relational connections in close to home and expert life. These incorporate relational correspondence, bunch correspondence and dynamic, authoritative correspondence in the work environment or relational correspondence. Rule of Business Communication In request to make correspondence viable, it is important to follow a few rules and standards. Seven of them are fundamental and applicable, and these are clear, finished, brief, obliging, right, thought to be, concrete. These standards are frequently called 7C for business correspondence. The subtleties of these correspondence standards are examined underneath: Politeness Principle: When conveying, we should build up a cordial relationship with every individual who sends data to us.
To be inviting and polite is indistinguishable, and politeness requires an insightful and amicable activity against others. Axioms are notable that gracious “pay of graciousness is the main thing to win everything”. Correspondence staff ought to consistently remember this. The accompanying standards may assist with improving courtesy:Preliminary considering correspondence with family All glad families have the mystery of progress. This achievement originates from a strong establishment of closeness and closeness. Indeed, through private correspondence these cozy family connections become all the more intently. Correspondence is the foundation of different affiliations, building solid partners of obedient devotion, improving family way of life, and assisting with accomplishing satisfaction (Gosche, p. 1). In any case, so as to keep up an amicable relationship, a few families experienced tumultuous encounters. Correspondence in the family is an intricate and alluring marvel. Correspondence between families isn’t restricted to single messages between families or verbal correspondence.
It is a unique cycle that oversees force, closeness and limits, cohesiveness and flexibility of route frameworks, and makes pictures, topics, stories, ceremonies, rules, jobs, making implications, making a feeling of family life An intelligent cycle that makes a model. This model has passed ages. Notwithstanding the view as a family and family automatic framework, one of the greatest exploration establishments in between family correspondence centers around a family correspondence model. Family correspondence model (FCP) hypothesis clarifies why families impart in their own specific manner dependent on one another ‘s psychological direction. Early FCP research established in media research is keen on how families handle broad communications data. Family correspondence was perceived as an exceptional scholastic exploration field by the National Communications Association in 1989. Family correspondence researchers were at first impacted by family research, social brain science, and relational hypothesis, before long built up the hypothesis and began research in a family framework zeroed in on a significant job. Until 2001, the primary issue of the Family Communication Research Journal, Family Communication Magazine, was given. Family correspondence is more than the field of correspondence analysts in the family. Examination on family correspondence is normally done by individuals in brain science, humanism, and family research, to give some examples models. However, as the popular family correspondence researcher Leslie Baxter stated, it is the focal point of this intelligent semantic creation measure making the grant of family correspondence special. In the field of in-home correspondence, correspondence is normally not founded on autonomous messages from one sender to one beneficiary, yet dependent on the dynamic interdependency of data shared among families It is conceptualized. The focal point of this methodology is on the shared trait of semantic development inside family frameworks. As such, producing doesn’t happen in vacuum, however it happens in a wide scope of ages and social exchange.
Standards are rules end up being followed when performing work to agree to a given objective. Hierarchical achievement relies significantly upon compelling correspondence. So as to successfully impart, it is important to follow a few standards and rules. Coming up next are rules to guarantee powerful correspondence: clearness: lucidity of data is a significant guideline of correspondence. For beneficiaries to know the message plainly, the messages ought to be sorted out in a basic language. To guarantee that beneficiaries can without much of a stretch comprehend the importance of the message, the sender needs to impart unmistakably and unhesitatingly so the beneficiary can plainly and unquestionably comprehend the data.>