{br} STUCK with your assignment? {br} When is it due? {br} Get FREE assistance. Page Title: {title}{br} Page URL: {url}
UK: +44 748 007-0908, USA: +1 917 810-5386 [email protected]

Overview
You have just started an internship at Workshire Bathaway (or “WB”), a large and very successful conglomerate in New York. You cannot believe your good fortune at working and learning at such a prestigious firm, and in fact have the opportunity to work directly with its President and CEO Ms. Wren Baker.
In order to assess your understanding of financial reporting and financial analysis Ms. Baker has tasked you with identifying a company that WB may want to purchase. Given the almost unlimited resources of WB it does not matter how big the potential target is, what industry it is in, whether it is public or private, where it is located globally, etc.
Seeing the perplexed look on your face, Ms. Baker has provided some more specific instructions below. To make an investment recommendation Ms. Baker asks that you select two similar companies for analysis, use data from public sources, prepare an extensive financial analysis, then communicate the results of your analysis in a detailed written report, and highlight the results in a short presentation. The goal is to provide an investment recommendation to Ms. Baker. Ms. Baker notes that this project will build your critical thinking, software usage, and communication skills.

Part 1:
A written report that includes the following:
A. Company profile: An overview of the companies that includes a description of the business operations, the industry in which they operate, their products, their markets, and competitors. This is very important to provide Ms. Baker with an understanding of the potential business purchase.
B. Company news: summarize at least 1 major event that have affected each company or their industry over the past two years.
C. Financial statement analysis: prepare and analyze condensed, trend and common size financial statements for each company.
D. Ratio analysis: prepare a comprehensive analysis of financial ratios for the companies focused on its profitability, efficiency, liquidity, and solvency. Where applicable compare to industry or competitor information and norms.
E. Research summary: Answer the following question in written form: Which of these two companies do you recommend WB to purchase? Prepare a written summary of your analysis and supported investment recommendation.

Part 2:
Which of these two companies do you recommend WB to purchase? Prepare an audio presentation (5 minutes or less) highlighting information from your written report that supports your investment recommendation.You need to record your presentation (audio only)

Key deliverables and timelines
Step 1:
You must select a pair of two companies for this project. For example, you can choose Pair #2 which includes PRB and PTR. However, it is not allowed to mix and match, i.e. choosing BTI and SNE are not allowed. You are encouraged to research potential companies before identifying company or companies they would like to analyze for this project.

Pair Company A Company B
1 America Movil AMX Vodafone Group VOD
2 Petroleo Brasileiro S.A. PBR PetroChina Co. Limited PTR
3 Sony SNE Koninklijke Philips N.V. PHG
4 Toyota Motor Corp TM Tata Motors TTM
5 British American Tobacco BTI Altria Group, Inc. MO
6 Banco Santander, S.A. SAN PNC Financial Services Group PNC
7 BHP Group BHP Rio Tinto RIO
8 ABB Ltd ABB General Electric Company GE
9 Ball Corp BLL Amcor AMCR
10 Diageo Plc DEO Constellation Brands STZ
11 Union Pacific Corp UNP Canadian National Railway CNI
12 Johnson & Johnson JNJ Novartis AG NVS
13 Capri Holdings CPRI V.F. Corp VFC

Step 2:
You are strongly urged to use spreadsheet software for purposes of the financial statement and ratio analysis (the quantitative items described in C and D above).

Detailed instructions (with suggested length):
A. Company profile (2 pages):
a. Review the corporate website of each company, which often provides general and investor relations information. Recognize that this information may be biased in favour of the company.
b. Review the annual reports (financial statements and management discussion and analysis), interim filings, and prospectuses, material change reports, and information circulars (as available).
Summarize your research in a 1 – 3-page written report on your companies –industry, products, and markets. This should be a professionally written paper with introductory and concluding paragraphs. Appropriately cite all sources.

B. Company news (1 page):
a. For each of your company, identify and summarize at least 1 major event that have affected the company or its industry over the two years. Discuss how this event is expected to impact the company’s operations and financial performance and ratios. Consider factors such as commodity prices, exchange rates, regulatory changes, acquisitions, changes in competitive landscape, changes in government regulation or consumer trends, etc.
b. It is important to not rely entirely on the company to identify these news items. In fact, you are unlikely to find this in any of the company’s reporting.
c. Ensure the items are legitimate ‘news’ – dividend announcements, analysts’ share price expectations, management conference call, company outlook announcements, etc. – these items are not news. Appropriately cite all sources.

C. Financial statement analysis (3 pages of quantitative analysis and 2 pages of written discussion):
a. For each of your company, collect at least three most recent years of financial statements which will provide at least 4 years of financial information.
b. Prepare condensed statements of financial position, statements of income and comprehensive income, and statements of cash flow. Use of spreadsheet software is strongly recommended.
c. Prepare trend analysis and common sized financial statements from the condensed statements.
d. Review the condensed, trend and common sized statement of financial position. For each of your company, comment on trends in the growth of assets, liabilities, shareholders’ equity and overall financial risk. Where available, compare the two companies.
e. Review the condensed, trend and common sized statement of income. For each of your company, comment on trends in revenue, expenses, income, and overall profitability. Where available, compare the two companies.
f. Review the condensed, trend and common sized statement of cash flows. For each of your company, comment on trends in the operating, investing and financing cash flows, and overall cash position. Where available, compare the two companies.
g. Write a summary of the overall financial ‘story’ reflected in the financial statements based on your analysis.

D. Ratio analysis (3 pages of quantitative analysis plus 2-page written report)
a. For each of your company, prepare an extensive multi-year ratio analysis based on the financial statement analysis. Use of spreadsheet software is strongly recommended. Do not use every possible ratio analysis. Rather, identify the ratios that are most important to the company.
b. For each calculated ratio, comment on whether the ratio is stronger or weaker, quicker or slower, more liquid or less liquid, more risks or less risky.
c. Where available, compare the financial ratios of the two companies.
d. Prepare written report discussing:
i. What the ratio analysis reveals about the companies – financial strength, profitability, risk, etc.
ii. The companies’ profitability, efficiency, liquidity, and solvency and noting whether these measures are improving or deteriorating, and the implications for a potential investor. What does this analysis suggest about future performance of the firms?
e. Discuss the impact of accounting rules on your financial ratios if applicable. You are not required to calculate the adjustment from one accounting rule to another. But, you need to discuss what kind of bias the differences in accounting rules may create for your financial ratios, if any.

E. Research summary (2 pages)
a. This written document should summarize your research in a clear and concise manner. b. As part of this document:
i. Indicate whether the overall profitability, efficiency, liquidity, and solvency of the companies are strong, average or weak. Comment on risks associated with the companies. Support your conclusions.
ii. Summarize current events and other items of importance. iii. Make a supported recommendation to Ms. Baker: indicate which of the two companies WB should invest in. Please include three to five significant points to justify your conclusion.

Presentation (audio only, up to 5 minutes): Please put in writing what must be said for the audio presentation on a separate word document
Which of these two companies do you recommend WB to purchase? Prepare an audio presentation that summarizes your research and analysis of the companies. No presentation slides are required. Use your research summary to organize your presentation.
Be convincing – should Ms. Baker invest in company A or company B? Does your research support your recommendation?
Focus on key financial information and ratios.
Focus on highlights of your research, not a broad summary.
Make it interesting, concise, and clear. And naturally Ms. Baker expects it to be professional.

Term Project Submission:
Your submission should include two files: a PDF file and an audio file. Prepare your PDF file with the following sections, in the order indicated:

  1. Title page
  2. Research summary (part E)
  3. Tell me about the company (part A)
  4. Company news (part B)
  5. Financial statement analysis (part C)
  6. Ratio analysis (part D)
  7. Sources
  8. Appendices (spreadsheet tables):
    a. Financial statement analysis: condensed and common sized financial statements b. Ratio analysis

Section Weights (%)
A. Research summary 10
B. Tell me about the company 10
C. Financial statement analysis and discussion 25
D. Ratio analysis and discussion 25
Sources 2
Professional quality – coverage, presentation, grammar 3
Presentation 25
Total 100

Sample Answer

Compelling correspondence is essential to the achievement all things considered but since of the changing idea of the present working environments, successful correspondence turns out to be more troublesome, and because of the numerous impediments that will permit beneficiaries to acknowledge the plan of the sender It is restricted. Misguided judgments.In spite of the fact that correspondence inside the association is rarely completely open, numerous straightforward arrangements can be executed to advance the effect of these hindrances.

Concerning specific contextual analysis, two significant correspondence standards, correspondence channel determination and commotion are self-evident. This course presents the standards of correspondence, the act of general correspondence, and different speculations to all the more likely comprehend the correspondence exchanges experienced in regular daily existence. The standards and practices that you learn in this course give the premise to additionally learning and correspondence.

This course starts with an outline of the correspondence cycle, the method of reasoning and hypothesis. In resulting modules of the course, we will look at explicit use of relational connections in close to home and expert life. These incorporate relational correspondence, bunch correspondence and dynamic, authoritative correspondence in the work environment or relational correspondence. Rule of Business Communication In request to make correspondence viable, it is important to follow a few rules and standards. Seven of them are fundamental and applicable, and these are clear, finished, brief, obliging, right, thought to be, concrete. These standards are frequently called 7C for business correspondence. The subtleties of these correspondence standards are examined underneath: Politeness Principle: When conveying, we should build up a cordial relationship with every individual who sends data to us.

To be inviting and polite is indistinguishable, and politeness requires an insightful and amicable activity against others. Axioms are notable that gracious “pay of graciousness is the main thing to win everything”. Correspondence staff ought to consistently remember this. The accompanying standards may assist with improving courtesy:Preliminary considering correspondence with family All glad families have the mystery of progress. This achievement originates from a strong establishment of closeness and closeness. Indeed, through private correspondence these cozy family connections become all the more intently. Correspondence is the foundation of different affiliations, building solid partners of obedient devotion, improving family way of life, and assisting with accomplishing satisfaction (Gosche, p. 1). In any case, so as to keep up an amicable relationship, a few families experienced tumultuous encounters. Correspondence in the family is an intricate and alluring marvel. Correspondence between families isn’t restricted to single messages between families or verbal correspondence.

It is a unique cycle that oversees force, closeness and limits, cohesiveness and flexibility of route frameworks, and makes pictures, topics, stories, ceremonies, rules, jobs, making implications, making a feeling of family life An intelligent cycle that makes a model. This model has passed ages. Notwithstanding the view as a family and family automatic framework, one of the greatest exploration establishments in between family correspondence centers around a family correspondence model. Family correspondence model (FCP) hypothesis clarifies why families impart in their own specific manner dependent on one another ‘s psychological direction. Early FCP research established in media research is keen on how families handle broad communications data. Family correspondence was perceived as an exceptional scholastic exploration field by the National Communications Association in 1989. Family correspondence researchers were at first impacted by family research, social brain science, and relational hypothesis, before long built up the hypothesis and began research in a family framework zeroed in on a significant job. Until 2001, the primary issue of the Family Communication Research Journal, Family Communication Magazine, was given. Family correspondence is more than the field of correspondence analysts in the family. Examination on family correspondence is normally done by individuals in brain science, humanism, and family research, to give some examples models. However, as the popular family correspondence researcher Leslie Baxter stated, it is the focal point of this intelligent semantic creation measure making the grant of family correspondence special. In the field of in-home correspondence, correspondence is normally not founded on autonomous messages from one sender to one beneficiary, yet dependent on the dynamic interdependency of data shared among families It is conceptualized. The focal point of this methodology is on the shared trait of semantic development inside family frameworks. As such, producing doesn’t happen in vacuum, however it happens in a wide scope of ages and social exchange.

Standards are rules end up being followed when performing work to agree to a given objective. Hierarchical achievement relies significantly upon compelling correspondence. So as to successfully impart, it is important to follow a few standards and rules. Coming up next are rules to guarantee powerful correspondence: clearness: lucidity of data is a significant guideline of correspondence. For beneficiaries to know the message plainly, the messages ought to be sorted out in a basic language. To guarantee that beneficiaries can without much of a stretch comprehend the importance of the message, the sender needs to impart unmistakably and unhesitatingly so the beneficiary can plainly and unquestionably comprehend the data.>

Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!