Explain the ethical implications of a breach of confidentiality.
2.Provide ethical theories and/or ethical principles
(from among those introduced in yourreadings) to substantiate your position. 3.Identify a reasonable alternative to address the dilemma presented in the article using a framework of ethical
decision making presented in lecture or in your readings. Explain the significance of applying this framework. 4.Explain how an ethics committee might
approach the dilemma using ethical theories, principles, and a collaborative approach to ethical decision making. Prepare this assignment according to
the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required. Rubric; 10.0 °/o Explain the Ethical
Implications of a Breach of Confidentiality Does not identify contextual features related to confidentiality. Does not distinguish among fact, opinion, and
value judgments. Fails to identify implications and consequences of breach of confidentiality. Incomplete discussion of issue. Superficial analysis of
ethical implications. Limited consideration of preexisting assumptions. Limited discussion of relevant context and exploration of implications. Identifies
influence of assumptions, addressing ethical dimensions that underlie the issue. Relevant context and thorough discussion of issue. Analysis includes
consideration of preexisting socially constructed assumptions. Identifies implications and consequences from a practice perspective. Analysis of issue is
comprehensive. Explores confidentiality with global perspective, identifying underlying relationships between stakeholders and among socially
constructed systems. 25.0 °/o Provide Ethical Theories and/or Ethical Principles to Substantiate Your Position Does not identify ethical theory and/or
principle from readings. Does not present own perspective. Discussion is grounded in absolutes, with little or no acknowledgement of own bias. Applies
ethical theory and/or principle to issue, though some aspects are incorrect or confusing. Key details and connections between theory and application are
missing. Presents own perspective without justification, does not address other views. Applies ethical theory and/or principle with limited integration.
Analysis is incomplete. Presents own perspective without justification. Integrates multiple viewpoints and comparisons of ideas or perspectives using
ethical theory and/or principles as a framework. Identifies own position on issue, but justification and connection to theory are incomplete. Appropriately
identifies own position on issue, drawing support from lecture content, experience, and information beyond assigned sources. Integrates ethical theory
and/or principle to substantiate position. 25.0 °/o Identify a Reasonable Alternative to Address the Dilemma Does not adopt a decision-making
framework. Presents a single perspective; alternatives are not addressed. Applies decision-making framework incorrectly. Confuses cause and
correlation; presents ideas and alternatives in confused or confusing sequence. Does not explain significance of applying framework. Identifies
alternatives with limited scope. Applies decision-making framework as foundation for selecting alternatives and justifying their application, given the
context of the dilemma presented. Identifies alternatives that demonstrate relevance, accuracy, and completeness. Applies decision-making framework
with clearly distinct correlations of relationships among ideas. Integrates decision-making framework in a complex process of judgment and justification
with comprehensive discussion of implications for each alternative identified. Clearly articulates significance of framework with a thorough discussion of
strengths and limitations. 20.0 °/o Explain How an Ethics Committee Might Approach the Dilemma Using Ethical Theories, Principles, and a Collaborative
PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT 🙂