{br} STUCK with your assignment? {br} When is it due? {br} Get FREE assistance. Page Title: {title}{br} Page URL: {url}
UK: +44 748 007-0908, USA: +1 917 810-5386 [email protected]

Essay Portfolio

Topic:
Debates around transnational feminism have emphasised the tension between universalism
and cultural specificity. Write an essay that uses a Southeast Asian example (or examples) to
explore the relative merits of the different positions in these debates.
For this topic your essay portfolio will include a critical reading log of:
Mackie, V. 2001. The Language of Globalization, Transnationality and Feminism. International
Feminist Journal of Politics  3 (2):180-206.

The essay portfolio is designed to help you write the best-argued, most polished essay you can. It
consists of three components:

1. critical reading log of the designated journal article (two pages, 12 pt single-spaced)
2. a preliminary bibliography (at least 4 relevant, academically credible sources, each with a
50-100 word annotation about its argument)
3. a 300-400 word draft introduction (which consists of some background information, an
outline of the main points covered in the essay and a statement of your argument)
In order to prepare a good portfolio you should do the research and reading, synthesise your findings,
and PLAN your essay. Do not write a draft of your essay before you submit your essay portfolio as
you may receive feedback that refocuses your approach. Some advice when preparing your essay
portfolio:
1. Collect the resources you think you need for the essay and read them.
2. Create an annotated bibliography of those resources.
3. Decide what your thesis (argument) is and how you are going to structure the essay to
convince the reader of that argument.
4. Make sure you have enough evidence to support your thesis.
5. Write your draft introduction (needs background, outline and thesis statement).
6. Put your draft introduction aside for a day or two and reread it to:
a. Make sure it makes sense and is written in good academic English;
b. Make sure it answers ALL aspects of the question.

Reading Log
Adjust the size of sections as required, but do not exceed two pages. The last section is the most
important (instructions follow).

Bibliographical
details:

Academic
credibility:

Summary of
overall
argument:

Type and
quality of
empirical
evidence given
in support of
the argument:

How  convincing is
this argument?
(give evidence
for your
response):

Notes on Critical reading logs:
Critical reading logs are a way of reading an article or book chapter for argument and key points
rather than trying to note and remember all of the content. Reading logs can vary from a single page
for an article/book chapter l to a few pages for a key text.
Steps in Producing a Reading Log
1. Note the reference’s full bibliographical details.
2. Look at the bibliography, checking the academic credibility of the references the author has
used. Take particular note of whether they’ve used peer-refereed sources (e.g. journal articles
and books published by academic publishers). Scan the article and note also how much
original work has been done. Write a short sentence assessing the academic credibility of the
article based on this information.
3. Read the abstract, the introduction and the conclusion. Then put the reading aside and write a
summary using your own words  of the author’s argument in 3-4 sentences. Do not quote
or paraphrase.
4. Skim each section, mentally noting its main point. How relevant is each section and how does
each section relate to author’s overall argument?
5. Pay careful attention to the empirical evidence presented by the author (if any). How useful
and relevant is it and to what extent does it support the author’s argument?
6. Based on this more thorough reading, revise your summary of the author’s argument, making
any changes necessary. Then add your critical comments.
7. Before you submit, check over your work, focusing on the following:
o  Have you identified the main point  of the article? You need to demonstrate that you
understand the argument, which is more than identifying some of the facts covered.
o  Do your critical comments engage with the empirical  and theoretical  elements of the
argument? Again, make sure that you are not just commenting on some of the facts.

NOTE: Critical reading logs are a very individual, particularly as you are required to put the
reading aside and write a summary of main points rather than copying out quotes or key
passages, or paraphrasing. The only things two reading logs on the same source should have
in common are the bibliographical reference.

Sample Answer

Compelling correspondence is essential to the achievement all things considered but since of the changing idea of the present working environments, successful correspondence turns out to be more troublesome, and because of the numerous impediments that will permit beneficiaries to acknowledge the plan of the sender It is restricted. Misguided judgments.In spite of the fact that correspondence inside the association is rarely completely open, numerous straightforward arrangements can be executed to advance the effect of these hindrances.

Concerning specific contextual analysis, two significant correspondence standards, correspondence channel determination and commotion are self-evident. This course presents the standards of correspondence, the act of general correspondence, and different speculations to all the more likely comprehend the correspondence exchanges experienced in regular daily existence. The standards and practices that you learn in this course give the premise to additionally learning and correspondence.

This course starts with an outline of the correspondence cycle, the method of reasoning and hypothesis. In resulting modules of the course, we will look at explicit use of relational connections in close to home and expert life. These incorporate relational correspondence, bunch correspondence and dynamic, authoritative correspondence in the work environment or relational correspondence. Rule of Business Communication In request to make correspondence viable, it is important to follow a few rules and standards. Seven of them are fundamental and applicable, and these are clear, finished, brief, obliging, right, thought to be, concrete. These standards are frequently called 7C for business correspondence. The subtleties of these correspondence standards are examined underneath: Politeness Principle: When conveying, we should build up a cordial relationship with every individual who sends data to us.

To be inviting and polite is indistinguishable, and politeness requires an insightful and amicable activity against others. Axioms are notable that gracious “pay of graciousness is the main thing to win everything”. Correspondence staff ought to consistently remember this. The accompanying standards may assist with improving courtesy:Preliminary considering correspondence with family All glad families have the mystery of progress. This achievement originates from a strong establishment of closeness and closeness. Indeed, through private correspondence these cozy family connections become all the more intently. Correspondence is the foundation of different affiliations, building solid partners of obedient devotion, improving family way of life, and assisting with accomplishing satisfaction (Gosche, p. 1). In any case, so as to keep up an amicable relationship, a few families experienced tumultuous encounters. Correspondence in the family is an intricate and alluring marvel. Correspondence between families isn’t restricted to single messages between families or verbal correspondence.

It is a unique cycle that oversees force, closeness and limits, cohesiveness and flexibility of route frameworks, and makes pictures, topics, stories, ceremonies, rules, jobs, making implications, making a feeling of family life An intelligent cycle that makes a model. This model has passed ages. Notwithstanding the view as a family and family automatic framework, one of the greatest exploration establishments in between family correspondence centers around a family correspondence model. Family correspondence model (FCP) hypothesis clarifies why families impart in their own specific manner dependent on one another ‘s psychological direction. Early FCP research established in media research is keen on how families handle broad communications data. Family correspondence was perceived as an exceptional scholastic exploration field by the National Communications Association in 1989. Family correspondence researchers were at first impacted by family research, social brain science, and relational hypothesis, before long built up the hypothesis and began research in a family framework zeroed in on a significant job. Until 2001, the primary issue of the Family Communication Research Journal, Family Communication Magazine, was given. Family correspondence is more than the field of correspondence analysts in the family. Examination on family correspondence is normally done by individuals in brain science, humanism, and family research, to give some examples models. However, as the popular family correspondence researcher Leslie Baxter stated, it is the focal point of this intelligent semantic creation measure making the grant of family correspondence special. In the field of in-home correspondence, correspondence is normally not founded on autonomous messages from one sender to one beneficiary, yet dependent on the dynamic interdependency of data shared among families It is conceptualized. The focal point of this methodology is on the shared trait of semantic development inside family frameworks. As such, producing doesn’t happen in vacuum, however it happens in a wide scope of ages and social exchange.

Standards are rules end up being followed when performing work to agree to a given objective. Hierarchical achievement relies significantly upon compelling correspondence. So as to successfully impart, it is important to follow a few standards and rules. Coming up next are rules to guarantee powerful correspondence: clearness: lucidity of data is a significant guideline of correspondence. For beneficiaries to know the message plainly, the messages ought to be sorted out in a basic language. To guarantee that beneficiaries can without much of a stretch comprehend the importance of the message, the sender needs to impart unmistakably and unhesitatingly so the beneficiary can plainly and unquestionably comprehend the data.>

Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!