UK: +44 748 007-0908, USA: +1 917 810-5386 [email protected]

EffectiveProblemStatementsforPhDDissertationsV1.025Mar2021.pdf

 

Effective Problem Statements

for

Ph.D. Dissertations

Version 1.0

Edward M. Moore, Ph.D. Liberty University School of Business

25 May 2021

Effective Problem Statements for Ph.D. Dissertations V1.0 Page 2 of 9 

25 May 2021

Overview

The purpose of this paper is to give the researcher an overview of how to develop an

effective Problem Statement that will get them moving quickly and in the right direction for their

Ph.D. Dissertation. The Problem Statement can be thought of as the cornerstone of the research

proposal and it is responsible for establishing broadly what area will be studied. The Problem

Statement also provides clear and direct support from the current literature that demonstrates that

the problem does exist and how the research will add to the body of knowledge.

The Ph.D. dissertation is an academic research process which is intended to pursue

theoretical knowledge or practical knowledge with the overarching goal of adding to the body of

knowledge or fill a gap in the body of knowledge. The construction of the problem statement

begins by knowing which type of knowledge one is seeking. We can think of Theoretical

Knowledge as knowledge about a ‘thing’. One might make statements such as “I know about it”,

“I understand it”, or “I know what it is”. Practical Knowledge on the other hand can be thought of

as knowledge of how to use a ‘thing’. Here one might make statements such as “I know how to

use it”, “I know how to apply it”, or I know how to do it”. As an example, it is clear from this

discussion that an individual can have deep theoretical knowledge about transformational

leadership theory. This person can fully describe the benefits to followers of idealized influence

and how that impacts organizational performance. However, that same person might have no idea

how to actually deliver idealized influence in a meaningful way for a follower in a leader-follower

situation because they lack the practical knowledge that comes with application. Similarly, a leader

may have the practical knowledge necessary to provide meaningful idealized influence for a

follower in such a way that it positively impacts organizational performance but might not have

any idea regarding how the theoretical construct of idealized influence functions.

Effective Problem Statements for Ph.D. Dissertations V1.0 Page 3 of 9 

25 May 2021

Both types of knowledge have great benefit to the body of knowledge. Theoretical

knowledge provides a framework for understanding complex topics and developing theories about

how persons and organizations are impacted by them. That knowledge can then be applied in

various environments allowing practical knowledge to be developed. The task of developing a

problem statement for theoretical research and practical research share the same two basic steps.

First, the researcher must frame the problem, and second, the researcher must describe the

importance of understanding the problem.

All good research begins with a clearly articulated and focused Problem Statement.

Step One, Frame the Problem

Theoretical research problems - the goal is to gain theoretical understanding about a ‘thing’. It

could be a new trend, it could be a change in environmental conditions, it could be a change in

work or business circumstances. It is useful to ask yourself some questions to help clarify what

you are trying to understand. Some questions you might ask are:

 What is the problem?

 What are the circumstances / environments of the problem?

 What knowledge already exists about the problem?

 How is the problem currently described in the literature?

Below is an example of this type of theoretical problem framing:

The problem to be addressed is the generational shift in attitudes regarding the importance

of work-life balance. While Gen-X and older workers feel that work can and should take

priority over life when required by the organization, younger workers starting with

Millennials feel that life is equally important and that work priorities should not push aside

Effective Problem Statements for Ph.D. Dissertations V1.0 Page 4 of 9 

25 May 2021

life priorities. Research has focused on the reasons that younger workers give for making

these life priority choices, but there has been little research on the effect those choices have

on career development.

The first sentence clearly states what the problem is which in this case is a generational

shift in attitudes regarding work-life balance. The second sentence gives insight into the

circumstances surrounding the problem and the environment within which the problem is

occurring. The third sentence provides a brief overview of what the literature currently tells us

about the problem and what it does not currently tell us about the problem, which is identifying a

gap in the literature. Of course, when framing an actual research problem, you would include

multiple current (less than five years) citations from the literature to support the factual assertions

being made.

Practical research problems - the goal here is to gain practical understanding about a ‘thing’. It

could be a leadership or management technique, it could be a human resource development effort,

it could be a toxic leadership intervention technique. It is useful to ask clarifying questions here as

well. Some questions you might ask are:

 What is the problem?

 What are the circumstances / environments of the problem?

 Who / what is impacted by the problem?

 What has already been attempted to solve the problem?

Below is an example of this type of practical problem framing:

The problem to be addressed is the steady decline in employee engagement in the service

sector over the past five years when compared to other sectors. Research shows that

Effective Problem Statements for Ph.D. Dissertations V1.0 Page 5 of 9 

25 May 2021

employee engagement is lowest among Millennial and younger workers despite on-going

programs intended to improve engagement. This same group of workers has higher levels

of employee engagement in the tech sector where similar engagement programs are in

place.

The first sentence clearly states what the problem is which in this case is a decline in

employee engagement and provides details about the circumstances and environment where the

problem is occurring. The second sentence gives further clarity by highlighting that engagement

is lower among younger workers despite intervention efforts. The final sentence explains that this

same group has higher levels of engagement in a different environment, and why this is different

is a gap in the literature. Once again, when framing an actual research problem, you would include

multiple current (less than five years) citations from the literature to support the factual assertions

being made.

Step Two, Describe the Importance of Understanding the Problem

Theoretical research problems- the goal is to gain theoretical understanding about a ‘thing’.

Asking questions about the importance of understanding the problem can help clarify what you

hope to find out as a result of the study. Some questions you might ask are:

 How will addressing the problem add understanding to the body of knowledge?

 How will addressing the problem aid future research?

 Does the problem have consequences for the field of study?

Below is an example of this type of theoretical problem framing:

The literature characterizes this focus on work-life balance in some cases as a ‘heroic

choice’ demonstrating the importance of home life, and in some cases as an ‘egocentric

Effective Problem Statements for Ph.D. Dissertations V1.0 Page 6 of 9 

25 May 2021

disregard’ for organizational work priorities. It is necessary to gain a deeper understanding

of the career development consequences of maintaining work-life balance and the level of

awareness that employees have regarding those consequences. This research can help

develop better theories regarding differences in generational attitudes, perception, and the

practice of work-life balance, and how these factors are shaped by the market sector.

The first sentence gives more insight into what the body of knowledge currently tells us

about this issue. The second sentence explains what you hope to understand better which in this

case is the career impact to an individual that maintains strong work-life balance and their

understanding of that impact. The final sentence provides insight into where this new

understanding will ‘fit’ into the body of knowledge. When addressing the importance of

understanding an actual research problem, you would include multiple current (less than five

years) citations from the literature to support the factual assertions being made.

Practical research problems- the goal here is to gain practical understanding about a ‘thing’. Once

again, asking questions about the importance of understanding the problem can help clarify what

you hope to find out as a result of the study. Some questions you might ask are:

 How will addressing the problem add understanding to the body of knowledge?

 What are the consequences if the problem is not addressed?

 Does the problem exist in other circumstances / environments?

Below is an example of this type of practical problem framing:

Low levels of employee engagement in the service industry have been shown to reduce

operational effectiveness and customer satisfaction. The long-term effects are erosion of

revenue, market share, and profitability which can lead to organizational failure.

Effective Problem Statements for Ph.D. Dissertations V1.0 Page 7 of 9 

25 May 2021

Addressing this problem will have practical benefit to the service sector by increasing our

understanding of the problem in this environment compared to the tech sector and add to

the overall understanding of this issue.

The first two sentences provide an overview of the consequences of this problem in the service

sector. The third sentence discusses how addressing the problem will add understanding to the

body of knowledge of how this problem presents itself in different environments. Once again,

when addressing the importance of understanding an actual research problem, you would include

multiple current (less than five years) citations from the literature to support the factual assertions

being made.

Putting it Together and Moving Forward

Theoretical Research Problem

The problem to be addressed is the generational shift in attitudes regarding the importance

of work-life balance. While Gen-X and older workers feel that work can and should take priority

over life when required by the organization, younger workers starting with Millennials feel that

life is equally important and that work priorities should not push aside life priorities. Research has

focused on the reasons that younger workers give for making these life priority choices, but there

has been little research on the effect those choices have on career development. The literature

characterizes this focus on work-life balance in some cases as a ‘heroic choice’ demonstrating the

importance of home life, and in some cases as an ‘egocentric disregard’ for organizational work

priorities. It is necessary to gain a deeper understanding of the career development consequences

of maintaining a work-life balance and the level of awareness that employees have regarding those

consequences. This research can help develop better theories regarding differences in generational

Effective Problem Statements for Ph.D. Dissertations V1.0 Page 8 of 9 

25 May 2021

attitudes, perception, and the practice of work-life balance and how these factors are shaped by the

market sector.

Practical Research Problem

The problem to be addressed is the steady decline in employee engagement in the service

sector over the past five years compared to other sectors. Research shows that employee

engagement is lowest among Millennial and younger workers despite on-going programs intended

to improve engagement. This same group of workers has higher levels of employee engagement

in the tech sector where similar engagement programs are in place. Low levels of employee

engagement in the service industry have been shown to reduce operational effectiveness and

customer satisfaction. The long-term effects are erosion of revenue, market share, and profitability

which can lead to organizational failure. Addressing this problem will have practical benefit to the

service sector by increasing our understanding of the problem in this environment compared to the

tech sector and add to the overall understanding of this issue.

Moving Forward

Problem statements for gaining theoretical knowledge and practical knowledge are

acceptable pursuits for the Ph.D. in Organization and Management. A common analogy is thinking

of the body of knowledge as a road. The dissertation should either add a new section of road

(theoretical knowledge) or fill a missing spot in the existing road (practical knowledge). In both

cases, the doctoral candidate must make sure that the problem being proposed is within the scope

of Organization and Management and/or within the scope of their cognate. With a well-developed

problem statement such as the two above, the tasks of developing the purpose statement and the

research questions are very straightforward. In its simplest form, the purpose of the research will

be to add to the body of knowledge regarding the problem and its context. The research questions,

Effective Problem Statements for Ph.D. Dissertations V1.0 Page 9 of 9 

25 May 2021

when answered, must address all areas of the problem statement, and fulfill the promise of the

purpose statement of adding to the body of knowledge.

Summary

As stated earlier, all good research begins with a clearly articulated and focused Problem

Statement. Keep in mind that the goal here is not to develop a literary masterpiece; instead, the

goal is to establish a clearly stated foundation upon which the rest of the research project can be

built. It is only with the Problem Statement in place, that it is possible to develop research

questions, the conceptual / theoretical framework, the methodology, and a topical outline for the

literature review. The critical nature of this first step in the research journey cannot be overstated.

It is essential that the researcher take the necessary time here to get this right or the research project

will flounder or not develop at all.

Happy Researching!

Dr. Moore

Ready to Score Higher Grades?