economics of higher education
Order Description
Requirements for the Final Paper
You are required to conduct original research (with an emphasis on quantitative aspects of it) on some particular issue in higher education, and present the results in the form of a paper. The paper will try to build on the tools and skills you have mastered during this and other courses.
You can work on any topic relating to higher education – either in the US, or elsewhere in the world. Also, you have to analyze some data, for example, you can have a paper which looks like the Winston paper we read for the first assignment – logical reasoning accompanied by charts and tables.
Format
• 12 point, Times New Roman font (like this Word file)
• Line spacing of 1.5.
• 1-inch margins on all sides
• Numbered pages
• The main text should be between 12-15 pages for single submissions and 20-24 pages for joint submissions
• References, tables and charts are extra and not included in the page limit. (You may put in a data appendix if you want, but it is not necessary.)
• APA style of citation for references (in which you refer to sources by inserting parentheses in the text giving the author, date of publication, and the relevant page if necessary) and then list all the sources alphabetically on a References page at the end of the paper. When citing an author with two or more publications in a given year, distinguish them with letters after the date e.g. 1999a, 1999b.
Contents of the Paper
The contents of the paper should generally include the following.
Title Page with Abstract
This should include the title of the paper, your name, contact address, acknowledgements, disclaimer, etc. Also include an abstract, in about 150 to 200 words, summarizing what your study is about, how you approach the topic, and your findings.
Motivation/Background
Here you should set up the issue – the particular area and question in education that you focus on – and discuss why it is important and interesting. You may also want to mention if your findings might have some policy relevance in the real world.
Literature review
A summary of the previous literature, including references to any debates or disagreements. You should ideally link your own proposed research to this literature, discussing what your own contribution will be. (Later, after you present results from your analysis, you should discuss the importance of your findings vis-a-vis the existing literature.)
Data
Discuss the data set in some detail – where did you get it from, how it was collected and for what purpose, why it is an important source for your current evaluation (that is, whether it has any special features that make it particularly appealing to your study), etc.
Research design/Theoretical framework
This does not mean mathematical or algebraic equations- just that you should discuss the underlying analytical framework behind your research. For example, you may want to look at the effects of attending community colleges. You should then discuss what the possible effects might be – on completion, transfer to a 4-year college, additional years of schooling, etc.
Research design/Empirical framework
For those of you who will be doing regression analysis, you should describe the regression equations that you wish to run in the data – that is, your dependent and independent variables. For every independent variable, mention the expected sign (or if the expected sign is ambiguous due to multiple factors being at work.) You should discuss your methodology clearly at this point – e.g. if you have a 0-1 binary variable as your independent variable, you should say whether you are running an OLS, or a probit, etc.
For those of you who are not doing regression analysis, but some other form of statistical analysis, just describe it.
Results/Discussion and Interpretation
Discuss your results, step-by-step. Pay attention not only to the signs of the coefficient, but also their magnitudes. Then take a bird’s eye-view approach, and discuss the overall importance of your results. Finally, compare and contrast these results with earlier work in the literature.
Limitations/Directions for Future Research
Not so much a statement on your ability or effort, but what you might have been able to done if you had infinite resources, either in terms of time or data. In other words, talk about what the next researcher in this area should try to address.
Conclusions
Just a wrap-up of what you have been doing. Make it short and concise, unless you want to highlight some interesting fact or extension.
PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT 🙂
Compelling correspondence is essential to the achievement all things considered but since of the changing idea of the present working environments, successful correspondence turns out to be more troublesome, and because of the numerous impediments that will permit beneficiaries to acknowledge the plan of the sender It is restricted. Misguided judgments.In spite of the fact that correspondence inside the association is rarely completely open, numerous straightforward arrangements can be executed to advance the effect of these hindrances.
Concerning specific contextual analysis, two significant correspondence standards, correspondence channel determination and commotion are self-evident. This course presents the standards of correspondence, the act of general correspondence, and different speculations to all the more likely comprehend the correspondence exchanges experienced in regular daily existence. The standards and practices that you learn in this course give the premise to additionally learning and correspondence.
This course starts with an outline of the correspondence cycle, the method of reasoning and hypothesis. In resulting modules of the course, we will look at explicit use of relational connections in close to home and expert life. These incorporate relational correspondence, bunch correspondence and dynamic, authoritative correspondence in the work environment or relational correspondence. Rule of Business Communication In request to make correspondence viable, it is important to follow a few rules and standards. Seven of them are fundamental and applicable, and these are clear, finished, brief, obliging, right, thought to be, concrete. These standards are frequently called 7C for business correspondence. The subtleties of these correspondence standards are examined underneath: Politeness Principle: When conveying, we should build up a cordial relationship with every individual who sends data to us.
To be inviting and polite is indistinguishable, and politeness requires an insightful and amicable activity against others. Axioms are notable that gracious “pay of graciousness is the main thing to win everything”. Correspondence staff ought to consistently remember this. The accompanying standards may assist with improving courtesy:Preliminary considering correspondence with family All glad families have the mystery of progress. This achievement originates from a strong establishment of closeness and closeness. Indeed, through private correspondence these cozy family connections become all the more intently. Correspondence is the foundation of different affiliations, building solid partners of obedient devotion, improving family way of life, and assisting with accomplishing satisfaction (Gosche, p. 1). In any case, so as to keep up an amicable relationship, a few families experienced tumultuous encounters. Correspondence in the family is an intricate and alluring marvel. Correspondence between families isn’t restricted to single messages between families or verbal correspondence.
It is a unique cycle that oversees force, closeness and limits, cohesiveness and flexibility of route frameworks, and makes pictures, topics, stories, ceremonies, rules, jobs, making implications, making a feeling of family life An intelligent cycle that makes a model. This model has passed ages. Notwithstanding the view as a family and family automatic framework, one of the greatest exploration establishments in between family correspondence centers around a family correspondence model. Family correspondence model (FCP) hypothesis clarifies why families impart in their own specific manner dependent on one another ‘s psychological direction. Early FCP research established in media research is keen on how families handle broad communications data. Family correspondence was perceived as an exceptional scholastic exploration field by the National Communications Association in 1989. Family correspondence researchers were at first impacted by family research, social brain science, and relational hypothesis, before long built up the hypothesis and began research in a family framework zeroed in on a significant job. Until 2001, the primary issue of the Family Communication Research Journal, Family Communication Magazine, was given. Family correspondence is more than the field of correspondence analysts in the family. Examination on family correspondence is normally done by individuals in brain science, humanism, and family research, to give some examples models. However, as the popular family correspondence researcher Leslie Baxter stated, it is the focal point of this intelligent semantic creation measure making the grant of family correspondence special. In the field of in-home correspondence, correspondence is normally not founded on autonomous messages from one sender to one beneficiary, yet dependent on the dynamic interdependency of data shared among families It is conceptualized. The focal point of this methodology is on the shared trait of semantic development inside family frameworks. As such, producing doesn’t happen in vacuum, however it happens in a wide scope of ages and social exchange.
Standards are rules end up being followed when performing work to agree to a given objective. Hierarchical achievement relies significantly upon compelling correspondence. So as to successfully impart, it is important to follow a few standards and rules. Coming up next are rules to guarantee powerful correspondence: clearness: lucidity of data is a significant guideline of correspondence. For beneficiaries to know the message plainly, the messages ought to be sorted out in a basic language. To guarantee that beneficiaries can without much of a stretch comprehend the importance of the message, the sender needs to impart unmistakably and unhesitatingly so the beneficiary can plainly and unquestionably comprehend the data.>
