Biology 1204 – Carbon Footprint Activity
Go to the website listed below, perform the following activities, and answer the following questions.
Part 1: Your CarbonFootprint
• Use the Free Carbon Footprint Calculator to estimate your current ecological footprint. Be sure the select the “For Me Only” option.
• Record your information below.
o Total Greenhouse Gas Emissions = 21
o Your Behavior Breakdown:
? Home Energy = 9.1
? Driving & Flying = 7.3
? Recycling & Waste = 3.4
? Food & Diet = 0.8
o U.S. Average per Person = 27
o World Average per Person = 5.5
Question 1: How do your greenhouse emissions compare to the average U.S. citizen with regards to total emissions and the breakdown of behavior. How do your greenhouse emissions compare to the average global citizen with regards to total emissions?
Question 2:What would your carbon footprint be after a 10% reduction? After a 50% reduction? Predict how you would need to change your behaviors in the four categories of the behavior breakdown to reduce your carbon footprint: by 10%, by 50%, so that it is equal to the average global citizen. (note: you will have to go back and change your selections to get the amounts to change)
Part 2: Reducing Your Carbon Footprint
• Use the Free Carbon Footprint Calculator to determine how you would modify your behaviors to reduce your footprint by 10%.
o For example, if you said you have installed energy efficient lighting “in some lights,” change your answer to “everywhere possible.”
o Record the changes you would need to make.
• Use the Free Carbon Footprint Calculator to determine how you would modify your behaviors to reduce your footprint by 50%. Record the changes you would need to make.
• Use the Free Carbon Footprint Calculator to determine how you would modify your behaviors to reduce your footprint so that it is equal to the average global citizen. Record the changes you would need to make.
Question 3: What does a carbon footprint represent? How does it compare to an ecological footprint?
Part 3: Summary and Conclusions
Question 4: What is the ecological significance of a high carbon footprint? Would you be willing to make the necessary changes to reduce your carbon footprint by 10%? By 50%? To the global average? Provide reasons why or why not.
Question 5: Develop an argument that supports your opinion on whether or not there is a need to regulate worldwide carbon levels in light of the major effects on the Earth’s ecosystems under a changing climate.
Ecological Footprint Assignment
Capstone Milestones Benchmark
4 3 2 1
Makes Predictions Identifies at least 5 contributing factors to an ecological footprint and makes an accurate prediction of their own Identifies less than 5 contributing factors to an ecological footprint and makes a prediction of their own Identifies fewer than two contributing factors to an ecological footprint and makes a prediction of their own Identifies fewer than two contributing factors to an ecological footprint. Fails to make a prediction.
Collect and analyze data, draws logical conclusions Is able to complete the reduction activities with 100% accuracy and able to describe what a carbon footprint represents Is able to complete the reduction activities with 75% accuracy and is able to describe what a carbon footprint represents. Is able to complete the reduction activities with 75% accuracy but is unable to describe what a carbon footprint represents. Is not able to complete the reduction activities with 100% accuracy and does not draw an accurate conclusion in describing what a carbon footprint represents.
Functions as a knowledgeable citizen Identifies their ecological footprint and makes at least three comparisons to the average global citizen. Identifies their ecological footprint and makes at least two comparisons to the average global citizen. Identifies their ecological footprint but does not make the connection to the average global citizen
Does not identify their ecological footprint and fails to make the connection to the average global citizen
Has an understanding of current controversy, and present both sides of issues, stating the risks and advantages. Student can apply (#) ethical perspectives/concepts to their effect on the environment accurately, and is able to consider full implications of the application. Student can (#) apply ethical perspectives/concepts to their effect on the environment accurately, but does not consider the specific implications of the application. Student can apply (#) ethical perspectives/concepts to their effect on the environment accurately, but does not consider the specific implications of the application. Student cannot apply ethical perspectives/concepts to their effect on the environment, and does not consider the specific implications of the application.
Present a well-reasoned argument that supports solutions States a conclusion focused solely on the assignment’s findings. The conclusion arises specifically from and responds specifically to the data. States a general conclusion that, because it is so general, also applies beyond the scope of the data. States a conclusion that is a logical extrapolation from the data. States an ambiguous, illogical, or unsupportable conclusion from the data.
PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT 🙂
Compelling correspondence is essential to the achievement all things considered but since of the changing idea of the present working environments, successful correspondence turns out to be more troublesome, and because of the numerous impediments that will permit beneficiaries to acknowledge the plan of the sender It is restricted. Misguided judgments.In spite of the fact that correspondence inside the association is rarely completely open, numerous straightforward arrangements can be executed to advance the effect of these hindrances.
Concerning specific contextual analysis, two significant correspondence standards, correspondence channel determination and commotion are self-evident. This course presents the standards of correspondence, the act of general correspondence, and different speculations to all the more likely comprehend the correspondence exchanges experienced in regular daily existence. The standards and practices that you learn in this course give the premise to additionally learning and correspondence.
This course starts with an outline of the correspondence cycle, the method of reasoning and hypothesis. In resulting modules of the course, we will look at explicit use of relational connections in close to home and expert life. These incorporate relational correspondence, bunch correspondence and dynamic, authoritative correspondence in the work environment or relational correspondence. Rule of Business Communication In request to make correspondence viable, it is important to follow a few rules and standards. Seven of them are fundamental and applicable, and these are clear, finished, brief, obliging, right, thought to be, concrete. These standards are frequently called 7C for business correspondence. The subtleties of these correspondence standards are examined underneath: Politeness Principle: When conveying, we should build up a cordial relationship with every individual who sends data to us.
To be inviting and polite is indistinguishable, and politeness requires an insightful and amicable activity against others. Axioms are notable that gracious “pay of graciousness is the main thing to win everything”. Correspondence staff ought to consistently remember this. The accompanying standards may assist with improving courtesy:Preliminary considering correspondence with family All glad families have the mystery of progress. This achievement originates from a strong establishment of closeness and closeness. Indeed, through private correspondence these cozy family connections become all the more intently. Correspondence is the foundation of different affiliations, building solid partners of obedient devotion, improving family way of life, and assisting with accomplishing satisfaction (Gosche, p. 1). In any case, so as to keep up an amicable relationship, a few families experienced tumultuous encounters. Correspondence in the family is an intricate and alluring marvel. Correspondence between families isn’t restricted to single messages between families or verbal correspondence.
It is a unique cycle that oversees force, closeness and limits, cohesiveness and flexibility of route frameworks, and makes pictures, topics, stories, ceremonies, rules, jobs, making implications, making a feeling of family life An intelligent cycle that makes a model. This model has passed ages. Notwithstanding the view as a family and family automatic framework, one of the greatest exploration establishments in between family correspondence centers around a family correspondence model. Family correspondence model (FCP) hypothesis clarifies why families impart in their own specific manner dependent on one another ‘s psychological direction. Early FCP research established in media research is keen on how families handle broad communications data. Family correspondence was perceived as an exceptional scholastic exploration field by the National Communications Association in 1989. Family correspondence researchers were at first impacted by family research, social brain science, and relational hypothesis, before long built up the hypothesis and began research in a family framework zeroed in on a significant job. Until 2001, the primary issue of the Family Communication Research Journal, Family Communication Magazine, was given. Family correspondence is more than the field of correspondence analysts in the family. Examination on family correspondence is normally done by individuals in brain science, humanism, and family research, to give some examples models. However, as the popular family correspondence researcher Leslie Baxter stated, it is the focal point of this intelligent semantic creation measure making the grant of family correspondence special. In the field of in-home correspondence, correspondence is normally not founded on autonomous messages from one sender to one beneficiary, yet dependent on the dynamic interdependency of data shared among families It is conceptualized. The focal point of this methodology is on the shared trait of semantic development inside family frameworks. As such, producing doesn’t happen in vacuum, however it happens in a wide scope of ages and social exchange.
Standards are rules end up being followed when performing work to agree to a given objective. Hierarchical achievement relies significantly upon compelling correspondence. So as to successfully impart, it is important to follow a few standards and rules. Coming up next are rules to guarantee powerful correspondence: clearness: lucidity of data is a significant guideline of correspondence. For beneficiaries to know the message plainly, the messages ought to be sorted out in a basic language. To guarantee that beneficiaries can without much of a stretch comprehend the importance of the message, the sender needs to impart unmistakably and unhesitatingly so the beneficiary can plainly and unquestionably comprehend the data.>