{br} STUCK with your assignment? {br} When is it due? {br} Get FREE assistance. Page Title: {title}{br} Page URL: {url}
UK: +44 748 007-0908, USA: +1 917 810-5386 [email protected]

Compare and contrast group interviews and non-structured interviews research methods using academic theory to justify the views

Order Description

Produce an individual report of no more than 2500 words

The proposed work is as follows:
• You will be allocated a set of research methods and/or techniques for this assignment.
• Compare and contrast your allocated set of methods and/or techniques, using academic theory to justify your views.
• You should address the following issues in your report:
o Strengths and weaknesses of the methods and/or techniques
o The suitability of the method / technique in different research contents
o Generalisability of results obtained using each method / technique
o Issues of using each method / technique, for example, ethical considerations, access to data, sample selection, bias, etc.

Outcome assessment:
• Exercise a critical understanding of the implications of using different research methodologies.
• Critically evaluate the quality of a research with respect to the appropriateness of research method used.
• Carry out information searching using a range of appropriate secondary sources.

TOPIC: Group Interviews vs Non structured Interviews

Assessment 1 requires you to produce an individual report of no more than 2500 words, comparing and contrasting selected research methods and/or techniques, using academic theory to justify your views.

Definition
Group Interviews: a general term to describe all non-standardized interviews conducted with two or more interviewees. “ONE-TO-MANY”

The first type of group interview is when each interviewee is interviewed by multiple interviewers.
The other type of group interview is when a group of interviewees for the same position are interviewed together by one interviewer.

Non structured interviews( Unstructured Interviews – ‘in-depth interviews’): No pre-prepared questions, but getting the respondent to talk about the subject.  Check for accuracy and rephrase answers. “BOTH ONE-TO-ONE & ONE-TO-MANY”

?    Both are non standardized.

In an exploratory study, in-depth interviews can be very helpful to find out what is happening and to understand the context. Semi-structured interviews may also be used in an exploratory study. Both of these types of interview may provide important background or contextual material for your study. You will find it helpful to conduct exploratory, qualitative interviews where your research design adopts an inductive approach, as in the development of grounded theory

Purpose : exploratory study
infer causal relationships between variables
to understand the reasons for the decisions that your research participants have taken, or to understand the reasons for their attitudes and opinions

Semi-structured and in-depth interviews also provide you with the opportunity
to ‘probe’ answers, where you want your interviewees to explain, or build on, their responses

Personal preference:
more likely to agree to be interviewed, rather than
complete a questionnaire, especially where the interview topic is seen to be interesting
and relevant to their current work.

an interview provides them with an opportunity to
reflect on events without needing to write anything down.

the opportunity for interviewees to receive feedback and personal assurance about the way in which information will be used

Nature of questions
where there are a large number of questions to be answered;
where the questions are either complex or open-ended;
where the order and logic of questioning may need to be varied

Length of time required and completeness:
Expectations clear about length of time required + participants agree objectives
Least under pressure time arranged
Modify the questionnaire if interviewees do not answer + form some indication of why

1/Strengths and weaknesses of the methods and/or techniques

Group Interviews    Non structured Interviews
Strengths    Breadth of points of view to emerge.

Capable of generating or responding to a number of ideas and evaluate them.

Opportunity to challenge one another’s view.

Reduce bias by including more people.

To identify key themes of a research.
In an unstructured interview the interviewer is able to discover important information which did not seem relevant before the interview and ask the interviewee to go further into the new topic.
An unstructured interview allows for the interviewer to build better rapport with the interviewee due to its parallels with a normal conversation. For this reason they are often considered to be better at researching sensitive subjects, such as domestic violence, due to this rapport gaining more honest responses, whereas structured interviews are often considered intimidating due to their formality and can often make the interviewee subject to social desirability bias
Unstructured interviews can be used when asking about something personal ,the interview could go off topic to make the persons taking the interview feel comfortable.

Weakness    Give them instruction rather than choice

Wording of requests

Group participants in a way not to inhibit possible individual contributions

Ensure balanced participation from every interviewee

Settings and location

Use of audio/video recording,

Using two interviewers
Unstructured interviews are a lot more time consuming in comparison to other research methods. This is due to their being no set questions and a priority of elaborated answers making it difficult to determine and enforce a set time.
As a result of the above disadvantage it is difficult to interview a large sample, affecting the data’s generalisability and representativeness.
The data collected in unstructured interviews is also prone to digression and much of the data collected could be worthless.

2/The suitability of the method / technique in different research contents

3/Generalisability of results obtained using each method / technique

4/Issues of using each method / technique, for example, ethical considerations, access to data, sample selection, bias, etc.

PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT 🙂

Sample Answer

Compelling correspondence is essential to the achievement all things considered but since of the changing idea of the present working environments, successful correspondence turns out to be more troublesome, and because of the numerous impediments that will permit beneficiaries to acknowledge the plan of the sender It is restricted. Misguided judgments.In spite of the fact that correspondence inside the association is rarely completely open, numerous straightforward arrangements can be executed to advance the effect of these hindrances.

Concerning specific contextual analysis, two significant correspondence standards, correspondence channel determination and commotion are self-evident. This course presents the standards of correspondence, the act of general correspondence, and different speculations to all the more likely comprehend the correspondence exchanges experienced in regular daily existence. The standards and practices that you learn in this course give the premise to additionally learning and correspondence.

This course starts with an outline of the correspondence cycle, the method of reasoning and hypothesis. In resulting modules of the course, we will look at explicit use of relational connections in close to home and expert life. These incorporate relational correspondence, bunch correspondence and dynamic, authoritative correspondence in the work environment or relational correspondence. Rule of Business Communication In request to make correspondence viable, it is important to follow a few rules and standards. Seven of them are fundamental and applicable, and these are clear, finished, brief, obliging, right, thought to be, concrete. These standards are frequently called 7C for business correspondence. The subtleties of these correspondence standards are examined underneath: Politeness Principle: When conveying, we should build up a cordial relationship with every individual who sends data to us.

To be inviting and polite is indistinguishable, and politeness requires an insightful and amicable activity against others. Axioms are notable that gracious “pay of graciousness is the main thing to win everything”. Correspondence staff ought to consistently remember this. The accompanying standards may assist with improving courtesy:Preliminary considering correspondence with family All glad families have the mystery of progress. This achievement originates from a strong establishment of closeness and closeness. Indeed, through private correspondence these cozy family connections become all the more intently. Correspondence is the foundation of different affiliations, building solid partners of obedient devotion, improving family way of life, and assisting with accomplishing satisfaction (Gosche, p. 1). In any case, so as to keep up an amicable relationship, a few families experienced tumultuous encounters. Correspondence in the family is an intricate and alluring marvel. Correspondence between families isn’t restricted to single messages between families or verbal correspondence.

It is a unique cycle that oversees force, closeness and limits, cohesiveness and flexibility of route frameworks, and makes pictures, topics, stories, ceremonies, rules, jobs, making implications, making a feeling of family life An intelligent cycle that makes a model. This model has passed ages. Notwithstanding the view as a family and family automatic framework, one of the greatest exploration establishments in between family correspondence centers around a family correspondence model. Family correspondence model (FCP) hypothesis clarifies why families impart in their own specific manner dependent on one another ‘s psychological direction. Early FCP research established in media research is keen on how families handle broad communications data. Family correspondence was perceived as an exceptional scholastic exploration field by the National Communications Association in 1989. Family correspondence researchers were at first impacted by family research, social brain science, and relational hypothesis, before long built up the hypothesis and began research in a family framework zeroed in on a significant job. Until 2001, the primary issue of the Family Communication Research Journal, Family Communication Magazine, was given. Family correspondence is more than the field of correspondence analysts in the family. Examination on family correspondence is normally done by individuals in brain science, humanism, and family research, to give some examples models. However, as the popular family correspondence researcher Leslie Baxter stated, it is the focal point of this intelligent semantic creation measure making the grant of family correspondence special. In the field of in-home correspondence, correspondence is normally not founded on autonomous messages from one sender to one beneficiary, yet dependent on the dynamic interdependency of data shared among families It is conceptualized. The focal point of this methodology is on the shared trait of semantic development inside family frameworks. As such, producing doesn’t happen in vacuum, however it happens in a wide scope of ages and social exchange.

Standards are rules end up being followed when performing work to agree to a given objective. Hierarchical achievement relies significantly upon compelling correspondence. So as to successfully impart, it is important to follow a few standards and rules. Coming up next are rules to guarantee powerful correspondence: clearness: lucidity of data is a significant guideline of correspondence. For beneficiaries to know the message plainly, the messages ought to be sorted out in a basic language. To guarantee that beneficiaries can without much of a stretch comprehend the importance of the message, the sender needs to impart unmistakably and unhesitatingly so the beneficiary can plainly and unquestionably comprehend the data.>

Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!