Case Study: Design and Technology

At this point in our class, you’re learning about innovative technologies associated with design, such as Gutenberg’s press, wood type, lithography, photography, and the Industrial Revolution. There is a long and intriguing design history between early printing processes and current digital media with on-demand printing. It’s clear that, historically, design and technology have been closely woven together within the larger aspects of society, culture, and history. One form of design – posters – has been a vital form of communication for centuries.

Select a Designer

For this paper, you will select a designer who has made an impact on poster design. You’ll be writing a case study. Put yourself in the role of a design writer – imagine you are writing an upcoming article for a design, illustration, or photography publication. Your paper should be less about traditional research – not just reporting facts – and more about critical and creative thinking. Your specific topic should be of interest to you and inspire you to look at the designer and the work from a broad perspective.

Include a Brief History

You will be researching the history and development of poster design, from broadsides in the 1500s to the period of the specific designer you have chosen to write about. Your paper should include a brief overview of the development of the poster, both technologically and culturally. You will research the designer’s methodology and discuss the reasons behind his or her creations (E.G. political, advertising or promotion, social commentary, public service campaigns, etc.). Discuss the designer’s technique and technical methods for the production of the type and imagery as well as how these areas were influenced by the technology available at the time. Include how the design approach was effective or appropriate for the topic. How did cultural, social, economic and/or historic factors influence the relationship between design and technology and the outcome of your selected

Analysis

Make a well-researched critical analysis* of audience reception of the message of the poster(s). This may be either hypothesized (based on your research), or on recorded historical fact. Describe the work as if it is the subject of an article in a periodical or a review of a gallery show. Include at least three examples of the designer’s work. You must describe, in detail, at least one of the posters shown in these images.

Regarding the designer’s work in the medium of posters, include specific information about that person’s influence in the design field and include at least one example of any type of work created by someone else showing this influence. This may be documented or it may be an analysis of your own discovery.

*this does not mean you are writing a critique or criticizing the work

Note: Be careful of a couple potential issues with online sourcing of images: some posters with the designer’s name may have been created to promote lectures by that person and were not actually created by the designer; some images may look like posters but are in fact book covers, magazine layouts or other designs. Research carefully!

A short list of designers to research:

Beggarstaff Brothers
A. M. Cassandra
Leonetto Capiello
Henri de Toulouse-Lautrec
Jules Chéret
Erik Nitsche
Edward McKnight Kauffer
Herbert Matter
Herbert Bayer
Lester Beall
Austin Cooper
Joseph Binder
Joseph Müller-Brockmann
Armin Hoffmann
Wolfgang Weingart
Saul Bass
Paul Rand
Ben Shahn
Jean Widmer
Massimo Vignelli
Paula Scher
Barbara Kruger
James Victore
David Carson
April Greiman
Art Chantry
Cranbrook Academy
Katherine McCoy & Michael McCoy
Lucille Tenazas
Elliott Earls
Laurie Haycock & P. Scott Makela
Javier Jean
This is not a comprehensive list – you may propose other designers.

Some spaces and places to spark ideas for your paper (this is not an exhaustive list… it’s a wild world out there):

AIGA.org (Links to an external site.)
Cooper Hewitt National Design Museum (Links to an external site.)
Design Observer (Links to an external site.)
Reading Design (Links to an external site.)
Alphabettes (Links to an external site.)
Aperture (Links to an external site.) (blog)
Magnum Photos (Links to an external site.) (arts & culture section)
British Journal of Photography (Links to an external site.)
Podcasts such as Design Matters (Links to an external site.), Scratching the Surface (Links to an external site.), or Through Process (Links to an external site.)
Eye magazine (Links to an external site.) (articles and blog, KSU Library has printed issues)
Letterform Archive (Links to an external site.)
…and many more

A search of journals in the Kent State periodical system will help you to find articles in design and academic periodicals. Many of these can be accessed online. Do not rely solely on Websites that are not online versions of established journals – you must include at least one book or journal source in addition to our course textbook (if referenced).

If you can’t find specific facts about your selected designer, you can make a case for technological, social, cultural or other influences on the type of work they created.

Though your perspectives in your analysis are an important part of this paper, you must include facts to support your views. All sources must be referenced (cited) and included in a bibliography. Use the Chicago Manual of Style. At times, you may find that contrasting views are helpful. Pay attention to the cultural and social milieu of your subject.

Deadlines are in the GDP Schedule.

Project requirements follow

Abstract/Proposal

150–200 words (undergrad students)

250–300 words (graduate students)

30 points

Determine a designer you propose to research and write about. State your intentions for addressing this designer and how the person relates to the history of design. The proposal must include the subject’s cultural, societal, and/or historic connections and subsequent influence on the field of design. Include at least three references that will support your writing. Include a working title for the paper. Chicago Manual of Style must be used for the formatting of all sections.

Compelling correspondence is essential to the achievement all things considered but since of the changing idea of the present working environments, successful correspondence turns out to be more troublesome, and because of the numerous impediments that will permit beneficiaries to acknowledge the plan of the sender It is restricted. Misguided judgments.In spite of the fact that correspondence inside the association is rarely completely open, numerous straightforward arrangements can be executed to advance the effect of these hindrances.

Concerning specific contextual analysis, two significant correspondence standards, correspondence channel determination and commotion are self-evident. This course presents the standards of correspondence, the act of general correspondence, and different speculations to all the more likely comprehend the correspondence exchanges experienced in regular daily existence. The standards and practices that you learn in this course give the premise to additionally learning and correspondence.

This question has been answered

This course starts with an outline of the correspondence cycle, the method of reasoning and hypothesis. In resulting modules of the course, we will look at explicit use of relational connections in close to home and expert life. These incorporate relational correspondence, bunch correspondence and dynamic, authoritative correspondence in the work environment or relational correspondence. Rule of Business Communication In request to make correspondence viable, it is important to follow a few rules and standards. Seven of them are fundamental and applicable, and these are clear, finished, brief, obliging, right, thought to be, concrete. These standards are frequently called 7C for business correspondence. The subtleties of these correspondence standards are examined underneath: Politeness Principle: When conveying, we should build up a cordial relationship with every individual who sends data to us.

To be inviting and polite is indistinguishable, and politeness requires an insightful and amicable activity against others. Axioms are notable that gracious “pay of graciousness is the main thing to win everything”. Correspondence staff ought to consistently remember this. The accompanying standards may assist with improving courtesy:Preliminary considering correspondence with family All glad families have the mystery of progress. This achievement originates from a strong establishment of closeness and closeness. Indeed, through private correspondence these cozy family connections become all the more intently. Correspondence is the foundation of different affiliations, building solid partners of obedient devotion, improving family way of life, and assisting with accomplishing satisfaction (Gosche, p. 1). In any case, so as to keep up an amicable relationship, a few families experienced tumultuous encounters. Correspondence in the family is an intricate and alluring marvel. Correspondence between families isn’t restricted to single messages between families or verbal correspondence.

It is a unique cycle that oversees force, closeness and limits, cohesiveness and flexibility of route frameworks, and makes pictures, topics, stories, ceremonies, rules, jobs, making implications, making a feeling of family life An intelligent cycle that makes a model. This model has passed ages. Notwithstanding the view as a family and family automatic framework, one of the greatest exploration establishments in between family correspondence centers around a family correspondence model. Family correspondence model (FCP) hypothesis clarifies why families impart in their own specific manner dependent on one another ‘s psychological direction. Early FCP research established in media research is keen on how families handle broad communications data. Family correspondence was perceived as an exceptional scholastic exploration field by the National Communications Association in 1989. Family correspondence researchers were at first impacted by family research, social brain science, and relational hypothesis, before long built up the hypothesis and began research in a family framework zeroed in on a significant job. Until 2001, the primary issue of the Family Communication Research Journal, Family Communication Magazine, was given. Family correspondence is more than the field of correspondence analysts in the family. Examination on family correspondence is normally done by individuals in brain science, humanism, and family research, to give some examples models. However, as the popular family correspondence researcher Leslie Baxter stated, it is the focal point of this intelligent semantic creation measure making the grant of family correspondence special. In the field of in-home correspondence, correspondence is normally not founded on autonomous messages from one sender to one beneficiary, yet dependent on the dynamic interdependency of data shared among families It is conceptualized. The focal point of this methodology is on the shared trait of semantic development inside family frameworks. As such, producing doesn’t happen in vacuum, however it happens in a wide scope of ages and social exchange.

Standards are rules end up being followed when performing work to agree to a given objective. Hierarchical achievement relies significantly upon compelling correspondence. So as to successfully impart, it is important to follow a few standards and rules. Coming up next are rules to guarantee powerful correspondence: clearness: lucidity of data is a significant guideline of correspondence. For beneficiaries to know the message plainly, the messages ought to be sorted out in a basic language. To guarantee that beneficiaries can without much of a stretch comprehend the importance of the message, the sender needs to impart unmistakably and unhesitatingly so the beneficiary can plainly and unquestionably comprehend the data.>

Case Study: Design and Technology

Sample Answer

Our Services

Secure Checkout

Our Advantages