Group Project: Ethics of the Automobile Industry
Format and Professionalism:
Written projects (22%) will be completed on a word processor, submitted on 8.5” x 11” white paper, double-spaced text, 1” margins, full justification, Type 12 Times New Roman Font, and will follow APA citation and referencing guidelines. They will include, in sequence: Title Page (c/w course number and title, project title, professor’s name, your names and date submitted); Executive Summary (1 page); Table of Contents; Introduction; Content Parts; Conclusion; References; and Appendices (to include appropriate Figures, Tables and Supplementary Items; all to be referred to in the main text). Note that References and Appendices can be single-spaced. Your report will include 25 pages of text in the main body, i.e., Introduction to Conclusion inclusive, and will not exceed 35 pages in overall length. Any additional pages beyond these limits will not be read or graded. A paper copy of the project is to be handed to the professor at the beginning of class on November 13, and an electronic copy must be submitted to Turnitin the same day. The penalty for late submissions (either the paper or electronic submission) will be 10% per day that the project is overdue.
Project presentations (10%) will be competed in the class time slot assigned by the instructor. The presentation workload will be divided equally among group members. Each 20-minute presentation will focus on one of the assigned main parts of the written project. As a group, you will be expected to develop an in-depth knowledge of the part assigned. During all presentations, all groups and their members will attend and participate.
Project Presentation (10% of course):
Introduction and Conclusion (20%): Introduction: was concisely presented, captured the attention, demonstrated clear purpose, and was presented confidently. Conclusion: was concisely presented, summarized the main points effectively, finished within time limit, and was presented strongly.
Content, Structure and Coordination (40%): Content: demonstrated a high level of subject matter knowledge. Structure: was well organized with appropriate emphases. Coordination: transitions within the presentation were seamless.
Effectiveness of Communication (20%): Verbal: suitable volume, rate of delivery, intonation and articulation. Non-verbal: suitable posture, gestures, movement and eye contact.
Question Period (20%): Level of poise and adaptability demonstrated in responding to questions.
Written Projects (22% of course):
Overall: Analyze the global automobile Industry from a business ethics perspective. Your report will include a signed contract among group members (Appendix A – 1 page) and a reflexive assessment of group processes (Appendix B – 3 pages). Conduct your analysis using publicly available information, i.e., secondary data; thus you will not contact companies or stakeholders directly.
Format and Professionalism (20%): As previously discussed.
Part 1 (12%): Provide: 1.The global history, development, and value chain of the automobile industry.
Part 2 (12%): Provide: 1. A detailed environmental analysis (PEST) of an automobile company of your choice; 2. An encompassing stakeholder map with a general discussion of five main stakeholder interests; 3. A specific stakeholder position analysis for each of the following three stakeholders: customers, the CEO, and competitors.
Part 3 (12%): Analyze the history of recalls for your automobile company and provide an overall assessment on the ethics of their recall behaviour. Also, provide suggestions on how your company can: 1. Reduce the number of recalls, and; 2. Improve its public response to recalls.
Part 4 (12%): Address the economic, social and environmental impacts of the global automobile industry from the following ethical perspectives: 1. Utilitarianism; 2. Feminist Ethics; 3. Postmodern Ethics; 4. Kant’s Categorical Imperative.
Part 5 (12%): Address the global automobile industry’s record in terms of: 1. Corporate Social Responsibility (the concept); 2. Corporate Social Responsiveness (in practice); 3. Corporate Social Performance (auditing, reporting, communication).
Executive Summary, Introduction, Conclusion, Appendices A and B (20%): As previously discussed.
Compelling correspondence is essential to the achievement all things considered but since of the changing idea of the present working environments, successful correspondence turns out to be more troublesome, and because of the numerous impediments that will permit beneficiaries to acknowledge the plan of the sender It is restricted. Misguided judgments.In spite of the fact that correspondence inside the association is rarely completely open, numerous straightforward arrangements can be executed to advance the effect of these hindrances.
Concerning specific contextual analysis, two significant correspondence standards, correspondence channel determination and commotion are self-evident. This course presents the standards of correspondence, the act of general correspondence, and different speculations to all the more likely comprehend the correspondence exchanges experienced in regular daily existence. The standards and practices that you learn in this course give the premise to additionally learning and correspondence.
This course starts with an outline of the correspondence cycle, the method of reasoning and hypothesis. In resulting modules of the course, we will look at explicit use of relational connections in close to home and expert life. These incorporate relational correspondence, bunch correspondence and dynamic, authoritative correspondence in the work environment or relational correspondence. Rule of Business Communication In request to make correspondence viable, it is important to follow a few rules and standards. Seven of them are fundamental and applicable, and these are clear, finished, brief, obliging, right, thought to be, concrete. These standards are frequently called 7C for business correspondence. The subtleties of these correspondence standards are examined underneath: Politeness Principle: When conveying, we should build up a cordial relationship with every individual who sends data to us.
To be inviting and polite is indistinguishable, and politeness requires an insightful and amicable activity against others. Axioms are notable that gracious “pay of graciousness is the main thing to win everything”. Correspondence staff ought to consistently remember this. The accompanying standards may assist with improving courtesy:Preliminary considering correspondence with family All glad families have the mystery of progress. This achievement originates from a strong establishment of closeness and closeness. Indeed, through private correspondence these cozy family connections become all the more intently. Correspondence is the foundation of different affiliations, building solid partners of obedient devotion, improving family way of life, and assisting with accomplishing satisfaction (Gosche, p. 1). In any case, so as to keep up an amicable relationship, a few families experienced tumultuous encounters. Correspondence in the family is an intricate and alluring marvel. Correspondence between families isn’t restricted to single messages between families or verbal correspondence.
It is a unique cycle that oversees force, closeness and limits, cohesiveness and flexibility of route frameworks, and makes pictures, topics, stories, ceremonies, rules, jobs, making implications, making a feeling of family life An intelligent cycle that makes a model. This model has passed ages. Notwithstanding the view as a family and family automatic framework, one of the greatest exploration establishments in between family correspondence centers around a family correspondence model. Family correspondence model (FCP) hypothesis clarifies why families impart in their own specific manner dependent on one another ‘s psychological direction. Early FCP research established in media research is keen on how families handle broad communications data. Family correspondence was perceived as an exceptional scholastic exploration field by the National Communications Association in 1989. Family correspondence researchers were at first impacted by family research, social brain science, and relational hypothesis, before long built up the hypothesis and began research in a family framework zeroed in on a significant job. Until 2001, the primary issue of the Family Communication Research Journal, Family Communication Magazine, was given. Family correspondence is more than the field of correspondence analysts in the family. Examination on family correspondence is normally done by individuals in brain science, humanism, and family research, to give some examples models. However, as the popular family correspondence researcher Leslie Baxter stated, it is the focal point of this intelligent semantic creation measure making the grant of family correspondence special. In the field of in-home correspondence, correspondence is normally not founded on autonomous messages from one sender to one beneficiary, yet dependent on the dynamic interdependency of data shared among families It is conceptualized. The focal point of this methodology is on the shared trait of semantic development inside family frameworks. As such, producing doesn’t happen in vacuum, however it happens in a wide scope of ages and social exchange.
Standards are rules end up being followed when performing work to agree to a given objective. Hierarchical achievement relies significantly upon compelling correspondence. So as to successfully impart, it is important to follow a few standards and rules. Coming up next are rules to guarantee powerful correspondence: clearness: lucidity of data is a significant guideline of correspondence. For beneficiaries to know the message plainly, the messages ought to be sorted out in a basic language. To guarantee that beneficiaries can without much of a stretch comprehend the importance of the message, the sender needs to impart unmistakably and unhesitatingly so the beneficiary can plainly and unquestionably comprehend the data.>