{br} STUCK with your assignment? {br} When is it due? {br} Get FREE assistance. Page Title: {title}{br} Page URL: {url}
UK: +44 748 007-0908, USA: +1 917 810-5386 [email protected]

Aga Khan (Religious Leader)

Directions for Leadership Analysis Research Paper:
Congratulations! Your leader has been approved and you are ready to get started on your research paper. The research paper will be worth 30
points and must be between 5 to 8 pages with an additional pages for the title and reference page. (Title and reference page does not count for
the 5-8 page research ). The Leadership Analysis Research Paper is due at the beginning of class on November 24th, 2014.
Your research paper must be typed using the Time New Roman 12 point font, doubled spaced with 1″margins and in a folder. The research
paper must follow the APA format and written in third person. Make sure you check your spelling.
You are required to use three to five literature references (all journal articles used must be peered reviewed articles as discussed during our
Library Research Workshop on October 8, 2014). You may use your leadership text, Leadership: Research Findings, Practices, and Skills, as a
reference to cite the leadership theory or theories you choose to use.
A grading rubric has been included. The purpose of this rubric is to help you outline and think through your leadership topic carefully and
organize it logically before you start writing. Before you begin to write your research paper, do your research and use the grading rubric to
outline your research paper. Check your outline to make sure that the points covered flow logically from one to the other. Include in your
outline an Introduction, a Body, and a Conclusion.
INTRODUCTION – Introduce your leader and provide a brief summary on why this leader has been important to society. State your thesis and the
purpose of your research paper clearly. What is the chief reason you are writing the paper? State also how you plan to approach your topic.
Explain briefly the major points you plan to cover in your paper and why readers should be interested in your topic. Use leadership theory and
empirical evidence to support your facts.
BODY – This is where you present your arguments to support your thesis statement. Find a supporting arguments for each position you take and
make sure to use leadership theory and empirical evidence to support your argument.
A) Summarization of individual personal leadership traits, characteristics, leadership style and how it was used, sources of power and influence
tactics using leadership theory and/or empirical evidence to support your argument.
B) Identification of the leader’s strengths and weaknesses using leadership theory and/or empirical evidence to support your argument.
C) Discuss the ethical issues your leader faced and what was the resulting actions taken by your leader using empirical evidence to support your
examples.
CONCLUSION – Provide a rational for choosing your leader. Restate or reword your thesis. Summarize your arguments. Explain why you have
come to this particular conclusion.
Leadership Analysis Research Paper Grading Rubric
A. Paper Composition and Organization:
Outstanding
Search paper will be evaluated based on the following:
(5)
Total points earned for paper composition and organization = 25 points
1. Introduction:
A) Who is your leader and provide a brief summary on why this leader
has been important to society (Use literature from your references).
B) Provide thesis statement and the purpose of your research paper
2. Body:
A) Summarization of individual personal leadership traits,
characteristics, sources of power and influence tactics using
leadership theory and/or empirical evidence to support your
argument.
B) Identification of the leader’s strengths and weaknesses using
leadership theory and/or empirical evidence to support your
argument.
C) Discuss the ethical issues your leader faced and what was the
resulting actions taken by your leader using empirical evidence to
support your examples.
3. Conclusion:
A) Rationale for choosing leader
B) Thesis rewording
C)Concluding Statement

PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT 🙂

Sample Answer

Compelling correspondence is essential to the achievement all things considered but since of the changing idea of the present working environments, successful correspondence turns out to be more troublesome, and because of the numerous impediments that will permit beneficiaries to acknowledge the plan of the sender It is restricted. Misguided judgments.In spite of the fact that correspondence inside the association is rarely completely open, numerous straightforward arrangements can be executed to advance the effect of these hindrances.

Concerning specific contextual analysis, two significant correspondence standards, correspondence channel determination and commotion are self-evident. This course presents the standards of correspondence, the act of general correspondence, and different speculations to all the more likely comprehend the correspondence exchanges experienced in regular daily existence. The standards and practices that you learn in this course give the premise to additionally learning and correspondence.

This course starts with an outline of the correspondence cycle, the method of reasoning and hypothesis. In resulting modules of the course, we will look at explicit use of relational connections in close to home and expert life. These incorporate relational correspondence, bunch correspondence and dynamic, authoritative correspondence in the work environment or relational correspondence. Rule of Business Communication In request to make correspondence viable, it is important to follow a few rules and standards. Seven of them are fundamental and applicable, and these are clear, finished, brief, obliging, right, thought to be, concrete. These standards are frequently called 7C for business correspondence. The subtleties of these correspondence standards are examined underneath: Politeness Principle: When conveying, we should build up a cordial relationship with every individual who sends data to us.

To be inviting and polite is indistinguishable, and politeness requires an insightful and amicable activity against others. Axioms are notable that gracious “pay of graciousness is the main thing to win everything”. Correspondence staff ought to consistently remember this. The accompanying standards may assist with improving courtesy:Preliminary considering correspondence with family All glad families have the mystery of progress. This achievement originates from a strong establishment of closeness and closeness. Indeed, through private correspondence these cozy family connections become all the more intently. Correspondence is the foundation of different affiliations, building solid partners of obedient devotion, improving family way of life, and assisting with accomplishing satisfaction (Gosche, p. 1). In any case, so as to keep up an amicable relationship, a few families experienced tumultuous encounters. Correspondence in the family is an intricate and alluring marvel. Correspondence between families isn’t restricted to single messages between families or verbal correspondence.

It is a unique cycle that oversees force, closeness and limits, cohesiveness and flexibility of route frameworks, and makes pictures, topics, stories, ceremonies, rules, jobs, making implications, making a feeling of family life An intelligent cycle that makes a model. This model has passed ages. Notwithstanding the view as a family and family automatic framework, one of the greatest exploration establishments in between family correspondence centers around a family correspondence model. Family correspondence model (FCP) hypothesis clarifies why families impart in their own specific manner dependent on one another ‘s psychological direction. Early FCP research established in media research is keen on how families handle broad communications data. Family correspondence was perceived as an exceptional scholastic exploration field by the National Communications Association in 1989. Family correspondence researchers were at first impacted by family research, social brain science, and relational hypothesis, before long built up the hypothesis and began research in a family framework zeroed in on a significant job. Until 2001, the primary issue of the Family Communication Research Journal, Family Communication Magazine, was given. Family correspondence is more than the field of correspondence analysts in the family. Examination on family correspondence is normally done by individuals in brain science, humanism, and family research, to give some examples models. However, as the popular family correspondence researcher Leslie Baxter stated, it is the focal point of this intelligent semantic creation measure making the grant of family correspondence special. In the field of in-home correspondence, correspondence is normally not founded on autonomous messages from one sender to one beneficiary, yet dependent on the dynamic interdependency of data shared among families It is conceptualized. The focal point of this methodology is on the shared trait of semantic development inside family frameworks. As such, producing doesn’t happen in vacuum, however it happens in a wide scope of ages and social exchange.

Standards are rules end up being followed when performing work to agree to a given objective. Hierarchical achievement relies significantly upon compelling correspondence. So as to successfully impart, it is important to follow a few standards and rules. Coming up next are rules to guarantee powerful correspondence: clearness: lucidity of data is a significant guideline of correspondence. For beneficiaries to know the message plainly, the messages ought to be sorted out in a basic language. To guarantee that beneficiaries can without much of a stretch comprehend the importance of the message, the sender needs to impart unmistakably and unhesitatingly so the beneficiary can plainly and unquestionably comprehend the data.>

Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!