Mental health and law and policy

Order Description

? Use the case study to do the learning outcomes.
? Produce a 3000 word written assignment based on a case study chosen (+/- 10%).
? The content must cover the 4 module learning outcomes.
? Write at level 5 standard
Case study two
Jenny is 88 years old, she lives in a “granny flat” within her son Graham’s home. Graham is an only child and he is a divorcee, he works full time in an office close

to home. Graham is Jenny’s main carer he takes Jenny food shopping every week and they enjoy going to the local social club for a game on dominoes on a Saturday

afternoon. Jenny is a fiercely independent lady and takes pride in her flat . Once a month Jenny is visited by her brother Dennis who lives in Leeds. When Dennis

visits he is very critical of the standard of care that Graham is providing. Graham finds the criticism very upsetting but feels he cannot say anything as it will

upset his mum. Jenny and Graham are happy with their living arrangements as they are able to keep in regular contact with each whilst at the same time maintaining

their own independence.
Over recent months Graham has started to notice that Jenny always wears the same clothes when they go out shopping or to the club, Jenny explains that she has done her

washing and there is nothing to worry about. One day Graham receives a call at work fro the police; Jenny has managed to lock herself out and she is very frightened

and confused. Graham rushes home form work to meet the police, they take Jenny into her flat. At this point Graham realises that Jenny has not been coping as well he

previously believed. The kitchen is a mess and there is stale milk and uneaten meals. This event triggers Graham to make an appointment with Jenny’s GP for an

assessment of her memory. The GP suspects that Jenny may have dementia and so refers her to the memory clinic who conform a diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. Jenny is

prescribed Aricept and the memory clinic monitor the titration. Initially Jenny tolerates the 5mg dose and seems to be doing well, however when the dose is increased

to 10mg she becomes very agitated and experiences unwanted side effects. The decision is taken to stop the medication and Jenny is discharged back to the care of the

GP.
Jenny and Graham continue with their living arrangements, but Jenny refuses to have outside carers in while Graham is out at work. Initially this is not a problem, but

within a few weeks of being discharged from the memory clinic Graham again receives a call at work from the police. Jenny has been found walking around town in her

nightwear in a disorientated and confused state, she is agitated and is asking stranger where the post office is. When the police return Jenny home they find that the

front door is wide open and there is a strong smell of gas. An emergency referral is made to the older adult community mental health team who feel that they cannot

support Jenny and they recommend an admission to hospital as an informal admission for a period of assessment. Initially Jenny agrees to the admission, she is able to

understand that she has recently placed herself in danger. As Jenny is able to retain and recall a decision she is deemed to have the mental capacity to agree to an

informal admission. Sadly within a few hours of arriving on the ward Jenny becomes very distressed and tries to leave. The nurse in charge detains Jenny using her

nurses holding powers while the duty doctor is contacted. When the duty doctor arrives he recommends that Jenny be detained under section 2 of the Mental Health Act

(1983) as she will not agree to stay as an informal patient, she is upset when the doctor explains the reason for admission accusing him of spreading lies. The AMHP

and part 12 medic attend the ward and all agree that Jenny should be detained under the provision of section 2. When the nurse in charge tries to read Jenny her rights

she is very upset and cannot understand what is being said to her, she rips up her patient rights leaflet and cries.

After 28 days Jenny’s section is allowed to lapse and it is not renewed. She remains on the ward as an informal patient while plans are made for her discharge. The

period of assessment reveals that Jenny is struggling to manage her self care needs, she is frequently disorientated to time and place and often gets up several times

during the night, needing to be returned to her bed again by the night staff. During the course of the admission Jenny tries home leave, she is escorted by the ward

occupational therapist and her named nurse who conduct a number of functional assessments within her flat. The home assessment reveals that Jenny is not safe in the

kitchen and is a risk accidental fire setting as she walks away from pans and is having difficulty coordinating her meal plans.

All of this information is fed back in a discharge planning CPA which both Graham and Dennis attend. Graham is very worried about how he will manage Jenny’s care and

working full time. Dennis is highly scathing of his nephew during the meeting is very open that he thinks Jenny would be better off in an nursing home. Jenny however

is adamant that she will never go into care and that she would rather be dead than living with old people in a home. In the CPA it is agreed that Jenny no longer needs

to remain on the ward and that home is no longer an option. The only choice seems to be for Jenny to go into 24 hour care but she continues to refuse this stating she

wants to go home. The ward make an application to the local authority for a depravation of liberty [DOL] order. The local authority approve the DOL application and

Jenny is discharged to St Margaret’s Nursing Home two weeks later.

Learning outcome for the Mental Health and LAW AND Policy
1. Evaluate the social policy, political and economic drivers, which influence mental health and care provision.
2. Evaluate the application of common and statute law in a mental health context, considering its relevance to the development of clinical practice and care/aftercare

delivery.
3. Demonstrate an understanding of the legal roles & responsibilities of the Registered Mental Health Nurse and other professionals
4. Critically evaluate the care and treatment offered to a person suffering from a mental disorder and conceptualise the complexities associated within law, policy and

practice.

Introduction to chosen case study (200-250 words maximum)
? Main Body (3000 words):
? Evaluate the social policy, political and economic drivers, which influence mental health and care provision (600 words)
? Evaluate the application of common and statute law in a mental health context, considering its relevance to the development of clinical practice and care/aftercare

delivery (600 words)
? Demonstrate an understanding of the legal roles & responsibilities of the Registered Mental Health Nurse and other professionals (600 words)
? Critically evaluate the care and treatment offered to a person suffering from a mental disorder and conceptualise the complexities associated within law, policy and

practice (600 words) the critique should be weaved as a narrative throughout the body of the text, this is not a separate section of the essay.
? Conclusion (200 words maximum)

PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT 🙂

Compelling correspondence is essential to the achievement all things considered but since of the changing idea of the present working environments, successful correspondence turns out to be more troublesome, and because of the numerous impediments that will permit beneficiaries to acknowledge the plan of the sender It is restricted. Misguided judgments.In spite of the fact that correspondence inside the association is rarely completely open, numerous straightforward arrangements can be executed to advance the effect of these hindrances.

Concerning specific contextual analysis, two significant correspondence standards, correspondence channel determination and commotion are self-evident. This course presents the standards of correspondence, the act of general correspondence, and different speculations to all the more likely comprehend the correspondence exchanges experienced in regular daily existence. The standards and practices that you learn in this course give the premise to additionally learning and correspondence.

This question has been answered

This course starts with an outline of the correspondence cycle, the method of reasoning and hypothesis. In resulting modules of the course, we will look at explicit use of relational connections in close to home and expert life. These incorporate relational correspondence, bunch correspondence and dynamic, authoritative correspondence in the work environment or relational correspondence. Rule of Business Communication In request to make correspondence viable, it is important to follow a few rules and standards. Seven of them are fundamental and applicable, and these are clear, finished, brief, obliging, right, thought to be, concrete. These standards are frequently called 7C for business correspondence. The subtleties of these correspondence standards are examined underneath: Politeness Principle: When conveying, we should build up a cordial relationship with every individual who sends data to us.

To be inviting and polite is indistinguishable, and politeness requires an insightful and amicable activity against others. Axioms are notable that gracious “pay of graciousness is the main thing to win everything”. Correspondence staff ought to consistently remember this. The accompanying standards may assist with improving courtesy:Preliminary considering correspondence with family All glad families have the mystery of progress. This achievement originates from a strong establishment of closeness and closeness. Indeed, through private correspondence these cozy family connections become all the more intently. Correspondence is the foundation of different affiliations, building solid partners of obedient devotion, improving family way of life, and assisting with accomplishing satisfaction (Gosche, p. 1). In any case, so as to keep up an amicable relationship, a few families experienced tumultuous encounters. Correspondence in the family is an intricate and alluring marvel. Correspondence between families isn’t restricted to single messages between families or verbal correspondence.

It is a unique cycle that oversees force, closeness and limits, cohesiveness and flexibility of route frameworks, and makes pictures, topics, stories, ceremonies, rules, jobs, making implications, making a feeling of family life An intelligent cycle that makes a model. This model has passed ages. Notwithstanding the view as a family and family automatic framework, one of the greatest exploration establishments in between family correspondence centers around a family correspondence model. Family correspondence model (FCP) hypothesis clarifies why families impart in their own specific manner dependent on one another ‘s psychological direction. Early FCP research established in media research is keen on how families handle broad communications data. Family correspondence was perceived as an exceptional scholastic exploration field by the National Communications Association in 1989. Family correspondence researchers were at first impacted by family research, social brain science, and relational hypothesis, before long built up the hypothesis and began research in a family framework zeroed in on a significant job. Until 2001, the primary issue of the Family Communication Research Journal, Family Communication Magazine, was given. Family correspondence is more than the field of correspondence analysts in the family. Examination on family correspondence is normally done by individuals in brain science, humanism, and family research, to give some examples models. However, as the popular family correspondence researcher Leslie Baxter stated, it is the focal point of this intelligent semantic creation measure making the grant of family correspondence special. In the field of in-home correspondence, correspondence is normally not founded on autonomous messages from one sender to one beneficiary, yet dependent on the dynamic interdependency of data shared among families It is conceptualized. The focal point of this methodology is on the shared trait of semantic development inside family frameworks. As such, producing doesn’t happen in vacuum, however it happens in a wide scope of ages and social exchange.

Standards are rules end up being followed when performing work to agree to a given objective. Hierarchical achievement relies significantly upon compelling correspondence. So as to successfully impart, it is important to follow a few standards and rules. Coming up next are rules to guarantee powerful correspondence: clearness: lucidity of data is a significant guideline of correspondence. For beneficiaries to know the message plainly, the messages ought to be sorted out in a basic language. To guarantee that beneficiaries can without much of a stretch comprehend the importance of the message, the sender needs to impart unmistakably and unhesitatingly so the beneficiary can plainly and unquestionably comprehend the data.>

Mental health and law and policy

Sample Answer

Our Services

Secure Checkout

Our Advantages