Scoring Rubric
Evidence-based intervention/treatment modality or program/leadership project
Criteria | Meets or Exceeds Expectations | Working Toward Expectations | Falls Below Expectations | Unacceptable | Points |
Knowledge and description of Intervention/modality or program/leadership project | Clearly & fully articulates topic area, all aspects of modality or program, multicultural skills, and knowledge gleaned. 8 points | Adequately articulates topic area, all aspects of modality or program, multicultural skills, and knowledge gleaned. 6-7 points | Limited articulation of topic area, all aspects of modality or program, multicultural skills, and knowledge gleaned. 1-5 points | Fails to articulate topic area, all aspects of modality or program, multicultural skills, or knowledge gleaned.
0 points
|
___ / 8 |
Primary developers and history of topic area | Fully explores all primary developers and topic history.
6 points
| Adequately details primary developers and history of topic area.
4-5 points
| Limited details of developers and history of topic area.
1-3 points | Fails to detail developers and history of topic area.
0 points
|
___ / 6 |
Primary modern uses and/or strategies in social work practice of topic area. How implemented in Field Practicum placement. | Clearly and fully articulates the modern uses and/or strategies of topic area in social work practice and how implemented in field.
6 points | Adequately articulates the modern uses and/or strategies of topic area in social work practice and how implemented in field.
4-5 points
| Limited articulation of modern uses and/or strategies of topic area in social work practice and how implemented in field.
1-3 points | Fails to articulate the modern uses and/or strategies of topic area in social work practice and how implemented in field.
0 points
|
___ / 6 |
Literature review & bibliography | Fully describes articles/books, modality or program (from previously created annotated bibliography) and how these pieces of literature inform practice. The literature reviewed is included at the end of the paper as a bibliography using proper APA formatting (no or few formatting mistakes are present).
10 points | Adequately describes articles/books, modality or program (from previously created annotated bibliography) and how these pieces of literature inform practice. The literature reviewed is included at the end of the paper as a bibliography using proper APA formatting (several formatting mistakes are present).
7-9 points
| Limited description of articles/books, modality or program (from previously created annotated bibliography) and how these pieces of literature inform practice. The literature reviewed is included at the end of the paper as a bibliography but not properly formatted in APA style.
1-6 points | Fails to include review of literature and/or properly formatted bibliography.
0 points
|
___ / 10 |
Implications for social work practice using chosen modality or program | Fully explores use and implications of modality or program.
5 points | Adequately explores use and implications of modality or program.
3-4 points
| Limited details are provided on implications/use.
1-2 points | Fails to provide implications.
0 points
|
___ / 5 |
Reflection on learning, grown, and professional development | Clearly articulates reflections on learning, growth, and professional development.
5 points | Adequately articulates reflections on learning, growth, and professional development.
3-4 points
| Limited details in reflections on learning, growth, and professional development.
1-2 points | Fails to reflect on learning, growth, and professional development.
0 points
|
___ / 5 |
TOTAL |
___ / 50 |