The Amazing Catch... or Was It? Writing Assignment 1: Fall 2015

The Amazing Catch… or Was It? Writing Assignment 1: Fall 2015

Paper details:
Step 1 First, watch the Amazing Ball Girl Video – You will need to watch this video before you complete the assignment. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4SqJz0NgnnE As you watch, decide whether you think the catch was “real” or “fake.” Step 2 Using the three stages of the Perception process, identify the process you followed to determine whether or not the situation shown in the video could be accomplished by the “Ball Girl.” Be certain you describe each step clearly and thoroughly. You can do this by first explaining the step in the perception process, then explaining how you completed that step while watching the video. 1. Name and define the first stage and identify the information you attended to, or selected, and identify which of the three characteristics of selection you used to focus on the information you chose (identify at least two separate examples). In doing so, please explain both the characteristic of selection as well as how this phenomenon helped you to complete the first step in the perception process. The student provides an explanation of the event(s) but does not explain how he or she selected certain information to attend to; the student may identify selection as a stage or one of the characteristics of selection but does not explain in any clear way how the stage was completed. 6.75 points The student addresses selection, describes the selection stage of the process and identifies at least one stimulus that they attended to; however, the characteristics of selection are not explained or applied to the answer OR a characteristic is addressed but the overall answer lacks evidence. 7.75 points The student clearly explains all of the stimuli that he or she attended to and explains in a clear way how at least one characteristic of selection aided in attending to particular stimuli; some evidence is addressed in the answer. 9 points The student clearly identifies and explains all of the stimuli that he or she attended to and how at least one of the characteristics of selection aided them in attending to the particular stimuli and the explanation of the completion of the stage and the role of the characteristics of selection in the process is clear and articulate and the student provided excellent evidence to skillfully support the explanation. 2. Name and define the second stage, explain how you completed the second stage, and explain which construct(s) you used in accomplishing this stage of the perception process. In doing so, please define the construct(s) and clearly explain how you used the construct(s) in organizing the information you selected. In this part of the paper, explain how stage one helped you to complete stage two. The student addresses how he The student addresses how he The student clearly and The student has not addressed the organization stage. or she organized the stimuli but does not clearly address the organization stage of perception or the explanation is incomplete and/or the student does not identify any of the organizational constructs (role, physical, psychological or interaction). or she organized the information that was selected, addresses the organization stage and explains how he or she used one of the organizational constructs (role, physical, psychological or interaction), though the explanation may be lacking. how he or she organized the information that was selected and explained how he or she used at least one of the organizational constructs (role, physical, psychological or interaction) and explained how the construct(s) was(were) used in the process of organization. Some evidence is addressed in the answer. articulately explained how he or she organized the information that was selected and explained how he or she used at least one of the organizational constructs (role, physical, psychological or interaction) and explained how the construct(s) was (were) used in the process of organization and the student provided excellent evidence to skillfully support his or her explanation. 3. Name and define the third stage, explain how you completed this stage, and explain which of the three factors of experience, knowledge and closeness influenced your conclusion in this stage and why you think they influenced your evaluation of the “realness” or accuracy of the video. In doing so, please define the factor(s) you used and explain how they applied to your interpreted the event in the video. In this part of the paper, explain how completing stages one and two helped you to complete stage three. The student has not addressed the interpretation stage. 5.25 points The student explains his or her interpretation as well as provides their opinion and response to the situation but does not address how any of the factors (experience, knowledge or closeness) influenced the interpretation and/or did not clearly explain how this stage was completed. 6.75 points The student explains his or her interpretation as well as provides their opinion and response to the situation and addresses, in some way, how selection and organization influenced interpretation, and addresses how one of the factors (experience, knowledge or closeness) influenced the interpretation though the explanation may be a bit lacking. 7.75 points The student clearly explains how selection and organization led to the interpretation of the event(s) and to arrive at an opinion and response to the situation and explains how at least one of the factors (experience, knowledge or closeness) influenced the interpretation and the student provides a clear explanation of how all of this information accumulated to form an interpretation of the situation. 9 points The student clearly and articulately explains how selection and organization led to the interpretation of the event(s) and to arrive at an opinion and response to the situation and explains how at least one of the factors (experience, knowledge or closeness) influenced the interpretation and the student provides an articulate, detailed and comprehensive explanation as to how all of this information accumulated to form an interpretation of the situation and the student provides excellent evidence to skillfully support his or her explanation. Points Earned:__________/ 9 Possible Points The following information is provided to assist you in completing this assignment: ? Your paper should be typed, approximately 2-4 pages long, and double spaced. ? The paper should also be proofread, and mistakes in grammar, spelling, sentence structure, The book is interpersonal Communications, second edition, Kory Floyd

Compelling correspondence is essential to the achievement all things considered but since of the changing idea of the present working environments, successful correspondence turns out to be more troublesome, and because of the numerous impediments that will permit beneficiaries to acknowledge the plan of the sender It is restricted. Misguided judgments.In spite of the fact that correspondence inside the association is rarely completely open, numerous straightforward arrangements can be executed to advance the effect of these hindrances.

Concerning specific contextual analysis, two significant correspondence standards, correspondence channel determination and commotion are self-evident. This course presents the standards of correspondence, the act of general correspondence, and different speculations to all the more likely comprehend the correspondence exchanges experienced in regular daily existence. The standards and practices that you learn in this course give the premise to additionally learning and correspondence.

This question has been answered

This course starts with an outline of the correspondence cycle, the method of reasoning and hypothesis. In resulting modules of the course, we will look at explicit use of relational connections in close to home and expert life. These incorporate relational correspondence, bunch correspondence and dynamic, authoritative correspondence in the work environment or relational correspondence. Rule of Business Communication In request to make correspondence viable, it is important to follow a few rules and standards. Seven of them are fundamental and applicable, and these are clear, finished, brief, obliging, right, thought to be, concrete. These standards are frequently called 7C for business correspondence. The subtleties of these correspondence standards are examined underneath: Politeness Principle: When conveying, we should build up a cordial relationship with every individual who sends data to us.

To be inviting and polite is indistinguishable, and politeness requires an insightful and amicable activity against others. Axioms are notable that gracious “pay of graciousness is the main thing to win everything”. Correspondence staff ought to consistently remember this. The accompanying standards may assist with improving courtesy:Preliminary considering correspondence with family All glad families have the mystery of progress. This achievement originates from a strong establishment of closeness and closeness. Indeed, through private correspondence these cozy family connections become all the more intently. Correspondence is the foundation of different affiliations, building solid partners of obedient devotion, improving family way of life, and assisting with accomplishing satisfaction (Gosche, p. 1). In any case, so as to keep up an amicable relationship, a few families experienced tumultuous encounters. Correspondence in the family is an intricate and alluring marvel. Correspondence between families isn’t restricted to single messages between families or verbal correspondence.

It is a unique cycle that oversees force, closeness and limits, cohesiveness and flexibility of route frameworks, and makes pictures, topics, stories, ceremonies, rules, jobs, making implications, making a feeling of family life An intelligent cycle that makes a model. This model has passed ages. Notwithstanding the view as a family and family automatic framework, one of the greatest exploration establishments in between family correspondence centers around a family correspondence model. Family correspondence model (FCP) hypothesis clarifies why families impart in their own specific manner dependent on one another ‘s psychological direction. Early FCP research established in media research is keen on how families handle broad communications data. Family correspondence was perceived as an exceptional scholastic exploration field by the National Communications Association in 1989. Family correspondence researchers were at first impacted by family research, social brain science, and relational hypothesis, before long built up the hypothesis and began research in a family framework zeroed in on a significant job. Until 2001, the primary issue of the Family Communication Research Journal, Family Communication Magazine, was given. Family correspondence is more than the field of correspondence analysts in the family. Examination on family correspondence is normally done by individuals in brain science, humanism, and family research, to give some examples models. However, as the popular family correspondence researcher Leslie Baxter stated, it is the focal point of this intelligent semantic creation measure making the grant of family correspondence special. In the field of in-home correspondence, correspondence is normally not founded on autonomous messages from one sender to one beneficiary, yet dependent on the dynamic interdependency of data shared among families It is conceptualized. The focal point of this methodology is on the shared trait of semantic development inside family frameworks. As such, producing doesn’t happen in vacuum, however it happens in a wide scope of ages and social exchange.

Standards are rules end up being followed when performing work to agree to a given objective. Hierarchical achievement relies significantly upon compelling correspondence. So as to successfully impart, it is important to follow a few standards and rules. Coming up next are rules to guarantee powerful correspondence: clearness: lucidity of data is a significant guideline of correspondence. For beneficiaries to know the message plainly, the messages ought to be sorted out in a basic language. To guarantee that beneficiaries can without much of a stretch comprehend the importance of the message, the sender needs to impart unmistakably and unhesitatingly so the beneficiary can plainly and unquestionably comprehend the data.>

The Amazing Catch… or Was It? Writing Assignment 1: Fall 2015

Sample Answer

Our Services

Secure Checkout

Our Advantages