TEAM ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS

TEAM ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS
Fall 2015
HIMS 650

Overview

Health care analysis is normally worked on in a team environment and should be the basis for strategic decision-making about patient care, business operations, and research. For this assignment each team will select a health oriented research question that can be analyzed using statistical procedures and an existing database. Each team will produce a research report that may help in formulating policies and/or programs within a health organization or a state or public health agency.

One of the most important parts of this assignment, and the part that will affect the rest of your decisions as a group is the choice of a question to analyze. It is highly advised that you choose your question at the same time that you find your raw data. If you choose a question that has no easily accessible data, you will need to modify your question as you progress. Therefore, finding the raw data that can be easily downloaded into an Excel spreadsheet is an important step. Since this step is so important, it is recommended that you use the Wonder tool for the CDC database. This tool has known raw data that can be used with Excel (other databases may require you to use other programs besides Excel. In this class, you are taught how to use Excel.)

Here is the website where you can access the Wonder tool.

http://wonder.cdc.gov

Here is the website for the Wonder Quick Start guide to help you learn how to use the Wonder tool.

http://wonder.cdc.gov/wonder/help/QuickStart.html#Request

Examples of valid questions that can drive health care policy:
1.   Does second hand cigarette smoke increase a woman’s chance of developing breast cancer in her lifetime?
2.   Does a person have an increased risk of cancer living in a certain geographic area?
3.   Do hospital admissions or discharges for a specific condition vary among states?

This assignment offers you an opportunity to exercise your creativity, both individually and as a team. This does not mean that your analysis should be based on conjecture alone. It should be based on sound quantitative and qualitative reasoning. In health care you will hear terms such as strategic decision making, business intelligence, and data-driven decision making. Qualitative and quantitative analysis underlies these decision making processes. Your conclusions should be supported with as much solid background literature as possible. Your professor will be helping to guide you through the process of producing this report.
Instructions

Develop a health research report of 14 pages formatted in accordance with APA guidelines. There are four parts to the overall submission. These parts are listed below and a more detailed description of what should be included in each are provided below:

1.   The work plan (This includes a title page and brief description of the health research question. The database and variables that will be used in the research study. Note, this database includes the raw data that you will analyze to answer your research question. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention supply many data sets that can be accessed by the public and are applicable to this project. It is highly recommended that you use the Wonder database tool. http://wonder.cdc.gov).
2.   The literature review
3.   The analysis plan
4.   The final project/paper, which contains the abstract, the previously submitted literature review, methods section, results section, discussion section, conclusions, and references.

Work Plan

You will need to find raw data that you will analyze to solve your research question. Keep this in mind as you develop your research question. This activity is designed to help formulate your research topic.

Literature Review

The literature review should be written as an introduction to your scientific research paper. Refer to the APA 6th edition publication manual, chapter 2, “Manuscript Structure and Content”. Note, scientific writing does not include direct quotes (always paraphrase instead) and should not be written in first person (e.g. no “I”, “we”). The paper should address the following 4 points:

1.   A description of the health research question. It is very important that you describe the unique attributes of this research and distinguish it from other studies. The research question can be an adaptation of an existing health research question that is analyzed using a different set of data or variables. (1-2 pages)

2.   A justification as to why there is a need for this research to be performed, supported by references from peer reviewed literature and articles, web sites, and/or interviews with relevant subjects. (1-2 pages)

3.   The population of people that will be impacted by this research. (1 page)

4.   A detailed literature review using at least 4 current (within the last ten years) peer reviewed research papers and/or articles to help provide a background for this research. (2-3 pages)

Include a brief synopsis at the end of the paper that identifies which team member contributed to which part(s) of the paper.

Make sure the finalized team literature review is submitted by one team member to your assignment folder and turnitin.com.

Analysis Plan

The analysis plan is your draft of the methods section. The methods section describes how your team will describe and analyze the data. Consider which descriptive statistics should be included. What inferential statistic test will you use to solve your hypothesis? Address the following items in your analysis plan.

5.   A detailed description of the health database that you plan to use along with the variables, analyses that you intend to perform. You should list the null and alternative hypotheses when relevant in this section. You should try to obtain enough background on the database to justify its reliability and validity. You should have several demographic or independent variables and two dependent variables identified.

?   It is highly recommended that you use the Wonder database:
?   http://wonder.cdc.gov
?   After you choose you topic in the Wonder database, click on the topic and then click on the “Request Form” tab at the top of the page. This tab will take you to a webpage that will allow you to limit your search by factors such as age, symptoms, etc.

6.   Your analysis should include:
?   A discrete frequency distribution for each of the variables.
?   A listing of basic descriptive statistics for central tendency (mean, median, mode) and variability (standard deviation, variance, range, and interquartile) when relevant.
?   A list of the inferential statistics you intend to perform on the variables such as t- tests, ANOVA, chi-square, or Regression. For this section you need to work directly with your faculty to choose the type of analyses you can perform on your data. All of these statistics must be explained in detail with respect to the research you are performing. They should be approved by your professor to make sure you are on the right track with your analyses.

Your professor will review your analysis plan to make sure you are setup to appropriately analyze the data and solve your research question.

Final Project/Paper
For the final project/paper (formatted in accordance with APA guidelines) you will pull the previous portions of the assignment together, analyze your data, report the results, discuss the findings, and draw conclusions. Note: All sections should include any updates or modifications based on team input or feedback that you received through postings or e-mail. Also one team member should submit the final paper to the assignment folder and turnitin.com.

The paper should include elements of a journal article (14 pages). These elements are: title page (1 page); abstract (1-2 paragraphs); a description of health research question, including justification for the research (1-2 pages); literature review (2-3 pages); methods section (1-2 pages); results section and exhibits (4-6 pages); discussion section (2-3 pages); conclusion section (1-2 pages); and a list of references (1-2 pages).

In addition, the key items below should be addressed or included in the final paper:

7.   Your analysis plan converted to a methods section (items 5 and 6 above). This methods section should also include a detailed description of the health database that is being used along with the variables. You should try to obtain enough background on the database to justify its reliability and validity. You should have several demographic or independent variables and two dependent variables identified.

8.   Perform your data analysis and report the results. The results section, including exhibits) should include figures, such as tables and graphs, which are relevant to your analysis. Use appropriate labeling, as shown in the APA formatting guide.

9.   The discussion section should focus on what the results mean. Did you solve your research question? Did you accept or reject your hypothesis?

10.   A conclusion section including the limitations of the research you performed, recommendations for health program/policy planning, or future research. In most research the findings usually point to additional unanswered questions that should be addressed in future studies. Do not overstate conclusions in a way that draws more from your work than what was actually found.

11.   A list of references.

Compelling correspondence is essential to the achievement all things considered but since of the changing idea of the present working environments, successful correspondence turns out to be more troublesome, and because of the numerous impediments that will permit beneficiaries to acknowledge the plan of the sender It is restricted. Misguided judgments.In spite of the fact that correspondence inside the association is rarely completely open, numerous straightforward arrangements can be executed to advance the effect of these hindrances.

Concerning specific contextual analysis, two significant correspondence standards, correspondence channel determination and commotion are self-evident. This course presents the standards of correspondence, the act of general correspondence, and different speculations to all the more likely comprehend the correspondence exchanges experienced in regular daily existence. The standards and practices that you learn in this course give the premise to additionally learning and correspondence.

This question has been answered

This course starts with an outline of the correspondence cycle, the method of reasoning and hypothesis. In resulting modules of the course, we will look at explicit use of relational connections in close to home and expert life. These incorporate relational correspondence, bunch correspondence and dynamic, authoritative correspondence in the work environment or relational correspondence. Rule of Business Communication In request to make correspondence viable, it is important to follow a few rules and standards. Seven of them are fundamental and applicable, and these are clear, finished, brief, obliging, right, thought to be, concrete. These standards are frequently called 7C for business correspondence. The subtleties of these correspondence standards are examined underneath: Politeness Principle: When conveying, we should build up a cordial relationship with every individual who sends data to us.

To be inviting and polite is indistinguishable, and politeness requires an insightful and amicable activity against others. Axioms are notable that gracious “pay of graciousness is the main thing to win everything”. Correspondence staff ought to consistently remember this. The accompanying standards may assist with improving courtesy:Preliminary considering correspondence with family All glad families have the mystery of progress. This achievement originates from a strong establishment of closeness and closeness. Indeed, through private correspondence these cozy family connections become all the more intently. Correspondence is the foundation of different affiliations, building solid partners of obedient devotion, improving family way of life, and assisting with accomplishing satisfaction (Gosche, p. 1). In any case, so as to keep up an amicable relationship, a few families experienced tumultuous encounters. Correspondence in the family is an intricate and alluring marvel. Correspondence between families isn’t restricted to single messages between families or verbal correspondence.

It is a unique cycle that oversees force, closeness and limits, cohesiveness and flexibility of route frameworks, and makes pictures, topics, stories, ceremonies, rules, jobs, making implications, making a feeling of family life An intelligent cycle that makes a model. This model has passed ages. Notwithstanding the view as a family and family automatic framework, one of the greatest exploration establishments in between family correspondence centers around a family correspondence model. Family correspondence model (FCP) hypothesis clarifies why families impart in their own specific manner dependent on one another ‘s psychological direction. Early FCP research established in media research is keen on how families handle broad communications data. Family correspondence was perceived as an exceptional scholastic exploration field by the National Communications Association in 1989. Family correspondence researchers were at first impacted by family research, social brain science, and relational hypothesis, before long built up the hypothesis and began research in a family framework zeroed in on a significant job. Until 2001, the primary issue of the Family Communication Research Journal, Family Communication Magazine, was given. Family correspondence is more than the field of correspondence analysts in the family. Examination on family correspondence is normally done by individuals in brain science, humanism, and family research, to give some examples models. However, as the popular family correspondence researcher Leslie Baxter stated, it is the focal point of this intelligent semantic creation measure making the grant of family correspondence special. In the field of in-home correspondence, correspondence is normally not founded on autonomous messages from one sender to one beneficiary, yet dependent on the dynamic interdependency of data shared among families It is conceptualized. The focal point of this methodology is on the shared trait of semantic development inside family frameworks. As such, producing doesn’t happen in vacuum, however it happens in a wide scope of ages and social exchange.

Standards are rules end up being followed when performing work to agree to a given objective. Hierarchical achievement relies significantly upon compelling correspondence. So as to successfully impart, it is important to follow a few standards and rules. Coming up next are rules to guarantee powerful correspondence: clearness: lucidity of data is a significant guideline of correspondence. For beneficiaries to know the message plainly, the messages ought to be sorted out in a basic language. To guarantee that beneficiaries can without much of a stretch comprehend the importance of the message, the sender needs to impart unmistakably and unhesitatingly so the beneficiary can plainly and unquestionably comprehend the data.>

Sample Answer

Our Services

Secure Checkout

Our Advantages