Response 631 Wk 7
Order Description
first to thank you vry much again for you continuous great efforts and nice job. I’ve sent you the best survey, as usual.
Now, the exactly one question, you have answered for me this week , has been answered by two of my friends and I need for this paper only one page response to both of my friends. You can divide the page into two halves, one half for each post, by doing Response 1 and Response 2, like last week.
Again, it is the same question you answered for me this week but please remember:
– Both responses are completely separate from each other , so please use two references for each response, NOT TWO REFERENCES FOR BOTH AT THE END OF THE PAGE (VERY IMPORTANT). However, no problem if you use the same two references for both question bur please let the two gropes of references for both posts separate from each other.
– There are three attached files with this order which are the two post of my friends and the third attached is your paper you sent me when you answered the same question this week and I put it here to avoid any conflict you my main post you did when you respond to both post.
– Please remember the information of this course again to avoid being away from the nature of the nature of this course:
– Course name: Organizational Management & Communication in Disasters Course description: DMM 631 Organizational Management and Communication in Disasters (3-0-3) This course introduces students to theories of organizational dynamics and management as it pertains to crisis and disaster situations. The course also explores communication within the organization, with external agencies, and with the public and media during and after disaster events.
How does communication play into chaos? How do we control and direct in the midst of a crisis? What decisions need to be made?
Communication is one of the best ways to keep organized during any situation, most of all a disaster. Everyone by this point can agree that the management of Hurricane Katrina was just simply not good. After the response to Hurricane Katrina, White House homeland security advisor Frances Townsend wrote a report on the on 11 key areas to make changes in to better improve disaster relief. One of the key points he emphasizes is the communication between organizations. For example, the National Weather Service issued a flash flood warning of up to 8 feet in the area because of a levee breach. However, Homeland security informed there officials that the levee wasn’t breached yet and the assessment was pending. FEMA also delayed in sending aid because of miscommunication and coordination Agriculture, Interior and Veterans’ Affairs departments (NBC News, 2006).
One of the best ways to prevent miscommunication is to select one person in each organization, information officer, that would be in charge of all communication. Any interagency communication would be done by the officer and all information would have to be verified by trusted sources before the information officer would disseminate it to other organization. If other organization receive information for the designated officer, then they would know that the information is verified and true.
References
Townsend, F. (2006). The federal response to Hurricane Katrina: Lessons learned. Washington, D.C.: White House.
NBC News. (2006, February 24). White House report cites Katrina failures. Retrieved December 30, 2014, from http://www.nbcnews.com/id/11509653/ns/us_news-katrina_the_long_road_back/t/white-house-report-cites-katrina-failures/#.VKH6l6AGA
How does communication play into chaos? How do we control and direct in the midst of a crisis? What decisions need to be made?
Communications play a large role in chaos. For example during 9/11, not only were there issues with the lack of interoperability between radio systems, terminology was not the same across multiple jurisdictions. In light of that, and with the authorization of the National Incident Management System (NIMS), and the establishment of the Incident Command System (ICS) it is critical for all to communicate effectively. NIMS called for, “using standard or common terminology is essential to ensuring efficient, clear communications, [and] requires the use of common terminology, including standard titles for facilities and positions within the organization” (FEMA, 2014). It requires plain English, no agency specific terms, codes, or jargon.
In the midst of a crisis, the planning process should have already happened by assessing the vulnerabilities within the organization and categorized based upon the risk. Supportive materials would have been developed and the spokesperson would have been trained on how to deliver the message to the target audience, or anyone who can benefit from the message (Walker, 2012). The decisions of wheat needs to be released and how, oral, written, or both, is then determined.
Department of Homeland Security. Federal Emergency Management Agency. (2014). National incident management system. Retrieved from: https://www.fema.gov/national-incident-management-system 29 December 2014
Walker, D. (2012)> Mass notifications and crisis communications: Planning, preparedness and systems. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press
PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT 🙂
Compelling correspondence is essential to the achievement all things considered but since of the changing idea of the present working environments, successful correspondence turns out to be more troublesome, and because of the numerous impediments that will permit beneficiaries to acknowledge the plan of the sender It is restricted. Misguided judgments.In spite of the fact that correspondence inside the association is rarely completely open, numerous straightforward arrangements can be executed to advance the effect of these hindrances.
Concerning specific contextual analysis, two significant correspondence standards, correspondence channel determination and commotion are self-evident. This course presents the standards of correspondence, the act of general correspondence, and different speculations to all the more likely comprehend the correspondence exchanges experienced in regular daily existence. The standards and practices that you learn in this course give the premise to additionally learning and correspondence.
This course starts with an outline of the correspondence cycle, the method of reasoning and hypothesis. In resulting modules of the course, we will look at explicit use of relational connections in close to home and expert life. These incorporate relational correspondence, bunch correspondence and dynamic, authoritative correspondence in the work environment or relational correspondence. Rule of Business Communication In request to make correspondence viable, it is important to follow a few rules and standards. Seven of them are fundamental and applicable, and these are clear, finished, brief, obliging, right, thought to be, concrete. These standards are frequently called 7C for business correspondence. The subtleties of these correspondence standards are examined underneath: Politeness Principle: When conveying, we should build up a cordial relationship with every individual who sends data to us.
To be inviting and polite is indistinguishable, and politeness requires an insightful and amicable activity against others. Axioms are notable that gracious “pay of graciousness is the main thing to win everything”. Correspondence staff ought to consistently remember this. The accompanying standards may assist with improving courtesy:Preliminary considering correspondence with family All glad families have the mystery of progress. This achievement originates from a strong establishment of closeness and closeness. Indeed, through private correspondence these cozy family connections become all the more intently. Correspondence is the foundation of different affiliations, building solid partners of obedient devotion, improving family way of life, and assisting with accomplishing satisfaction (Gosche, p. 1). In any case, so as to keep up an amicable relationship, a few families experienced tumultuous encounters. Correspondence in the family is an intricate and alluring marvel. Correspondence between families isn’t restricted to single messages between families or verbal correspondence.
It is a unique cycle that oversees force, closeness and limits, cohesiveness and flexibility of route frameworks, and makes pictures, topics, stories, ceremonies, rules, jobs, making implications, making a feeling of family life An intelligent cycle that makes a model. This model has passed ages. Notwithstanding the view as a family and family automatic framework, one of the greatest exploration establishments in between family correspondence centers around a family correspondence model. Family correspondence model (FCP) hypothesis clarifies why families impart in their own specific manner dependent on one another ‘s psychological direction. Early FCP research established in media research is keen on how families handle broad communications data. Family correspondence was perceived as an exceptional scholastic exploration field by the National Communications Association in 1989. Family correspondence researchers were at first impacted by family research, social brain science, and relational hypothesis, before long built up the hypothesis and began research in a family framework zeroed in on a significant job. Until 2001, the primary issue of the Family Communication Research Journal, Family Communication Magazine, was given. Family correspondence is more than the field of correspondence analysts in the family. Examination on family correspondence is normally done by individuals in brain science, humanism, and family research, to give some examples models. However, as the popular family correspondence researcher Leslie Baxter stated, it is the focal point of this intelligent semantic creation measure making the grant of family correspondence special. In the field of in-home correspondence, correspondence is normally not founded on autonomous messages from one sender to one beneficiary, yet dependent on the dynamic interdependency of data shared among families It is conceptualized. The focal point of this methodology is on the shared trait of semantic development inside family frameworks. As such, producing doesn’t happen in vacuum, however it happens in a wide scope of ages and social exchange.
Standards are rules end up being followed when performing work to agree to a given objective. Hierarchical achievement relies significantly upon compelling correspondence. So as to successfully impart, it is important to follow a few standards and rules. Coming up next are rules to guarantee powerful correspondence: clearness: lucidity of data is a significant guideline of correspondence. For beneficiaries to know the message plainly, the messages ought to be sorted out in a basic language. To guarantee that beneficiaries can without much of a stretch comprehend the importance of the message, the sender needs to impart unmistakably and unhesitatingly so the beneficiary can plainly and unquestionably comprehend the data.>
