Compare and Connect Stress, Coping and Intra- & Interpersonal Factors and Health
Across Health Conditions
To conclude Module 1, you will build a document in which you compare and connect the module topics across
health conditions and with healthy individuals. Below are suggested formats for this Assignment. Creativity and
thoughtful effort is encouraged. This type of Assignment helps with integration of learning and will help you
develop a deeper and broader understanding of the topics of the weeks, your specific assigned health
condition, as well as of the other major health conditions that affect the U.S. population.
Re-read the Week 2 and Week 3 Discussion contributions posted by you and your group members.
Note similarities and differences in what you and others found for the factors studied both weeks in this
module. Why are there differences? Why are there similarities? Are they explained by the characteristics of
each health condition? What other factors may have played a role? Draw conclusions from what you’ve read
on the boards, and also include your own thoughts on what may explain your conclusions.
Organize your findings by factors (stress, coping, personality, etc.). Use subtitles to help you stay focused and
help your Instructor grade effectively.
Compare and connect is a higher-order critical thinking skill. Review the Learning Resource, titled “Writing a
Paper: Comparing and Contrasting,” before you begin your Assignment.
By Day 7
At the end of the module (Week 3), write a brief, focused paper, or create a well-organized table in which you:
Compare and contrast your findings for your assigned health condition with that of others in your team, based
on your collective findings in the group Discussions.
Draw conclusions regarding reasons for similarities and differences among the health conditions.
Cite and reference your assigned readings for the class so far, as well as the readings you located to support
You can prepare this Assignment in essay format (with subtitles for each factor you are comparing) or in table
format. Either way, include a cover page (no abstract) and try to stay within 2–3 pages in length of text, plus
cover and reference pages. You are welcome to create your own graphs and figures if these facilitate your
understanding and ability to organize the material.
Submit your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 3.
Submission and Grading Information
To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:
Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “MD1Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as
Click the Module 1 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
Click the Module 1 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as
“MD1Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global
Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.
To access your rubric:
Module 1 Assignment Rubric
Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity
To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:
Submit your Module 1 Assignment draft and review the originality report.
Submit Your Assignment by Day 7
My name is Alzahraa Hassona. My assigned health disease is Heart disease and I will send you my posts from
last week and this week and my classmates posts to compare and contras for the assignment.
RE: Group B
Explain the bivariate (one-on-one) and multivariate (combined) relationships between heart disease and
personality, resilience/grit, and religion/spirituality.
Recent extensive research shows that socio-behavioral factors are related to the prevalence of heart disease.
Regarding personality, it has revealed that Type-A behavior pattern among individuals is a high predictor of
heart disease. Other factors such as resilience and religion/spirituality, however, are not causally related to the
prevalence of the disease but are important in helping the patients to cope with its effects.
The impact of heart disease on social relationships
Research reveals that involvement in social relationships is fundamental to health (Koenig, 2015). An individual
with heart disease will often strain physically, emotionally, and financially, which may affect their involvement in
social relationships. Given that these connections to others can give meaning and purpose to life, such
individuals are encouraged to maintain these relationships whenever possible to help in dealing with the
impacts of the illness.
The impact of social support on heart disease
Social support is essential in helping individuals to adjust to illnesses, given that it benefits both mental and
physical health (Taylor, 2011). Regarding heart disease, social support has indirect effects through enhanced
mental health, by fostering a sense of meaning and purpose in life as well as reducing the impact of stress for
a patient (Schwartz, Michael & Rapkin, 2017). Also, it may trigger physiological sequelae such as reduced
heart rate and blood pressure, among others.
Using the PERMA Theory of Well-Being to understand and integrate all we learned this week
According to the theory, five blocks are important in enhancing well-being. It recognizes that human beings do
not only want to survive but aim at thriving. Hence, they are more concerned about achieving higher levels of
well-being given its myriad benefits in the real world. In this regard, we can appreciate human beings are
unique and exhibit qualities that may increase or limit their well-being (Friedman & Kern, 2014). However, in
efforts to limit an individual’s stress and increase their well-being, one can embark on embracing the tenets of
the theory as it has been associated with a plethora of benefits. They include having stronger immune systems,
reduction in cardiovascular mortality, and having overall better physical health, among others.
Compelling correspondence is essential to the achievement all things considered but since of the changing idea of the present working environments, successful correspondence turns out to be more troublesome, and because of the numerous impediments that will permit beneficiaries to acknowledge the plan of the sender It is restricted. Misguided judgments.In spite of the fact that correspondence inside the association is rarely completely open, numerous straightforward arrangements can be executed to advance the effect of these hindrances.
Concerning specific contextual analysis, two significant correspondence standards, correspondence channel determination and commotion are self-evident. This course presents the standards of correspondence, the act of general correspondence, and different speculations to all the more likely comprehend the correspondence exchanges experienced in regular daily existence. The standards and practices that you learn in this course give the premise to additionally learning and correspondence.
This course starts with an outline of the correspondence cycle, the method of reasoning and hypothesis. In resulting modules of the course, we will look at explicit use of relational connections in close to home and expert life. These incorporate relational correspondence, bunch correspondence and dynamic, authoritative correspondence in the work environment or relational correspondence. Rule of Business Communication In request to make correspondence viable, it is important to follow a few rules and standards. Seven of them are fundamental and applicable, and these are clear, finished, brief, obliging, right, thought to be, concrete. These standards are frequently called 7C for business correspondence. The subtleties of these correspondence standards are examined underneath: Politeness Principle: When conveying, we should build up a cordial relationship with every individual who sends data to us.
To be inviting and polite is indistinguishable, and politeness requires an insightful and amicable activity against others. Axioms are notable that gracious “pay of graciousness is the main thing to win everything”. Correspondence staff ought to consistently remember this. The accompanying standards may assist with improving courtesy:Preliminary considering correspondence with family All glad families have the mystery of progress. This achievement originates from a strong establishment of closeness and closeness. Indeed, through private correspondence these cozy family connections become all the more intently. Correspondence is the foundation of different affiliations, building solid partners of obedient devotion, improving family way of life, and assisting with accomplishing satisfaction (Gosche, p. 1). In any case, so as to keep up an amicable relationship, a few families experienced tumultuous encounters. Correspondence in the family is an intricate and alluring marvel. Correspondence between families isn’t restricted to single messages between families or verbal correspondence.
It is a unique cycle that oversees force, closeness and limits, cohesiveness and flexibility of route frameworks, and makes pictures, topics, stories, ceremonies, rules, jobs, making implications, making a feeling of family life An intelligent cycle that makes a model. This model has passed ages. Notwithstanding the view as a family and family automatic framework, one of the greatest exploration establishments in between family correspondence centers around a family correspondence model. Family correspondence model (FCP) hypothesis clarifies why families impart in their own specific manner dependent on one another ‘s psychological direction. Early FCP research established in media research is keen on how families handle broad communications data. Family correspondence was perceived as an exceptional scholastic exploration field by the National Communications Association in 1989. Family correspondence researchers were at first impacted by family research, social brain science, and relational hypothesis, before long built up the hypothesis and began research in a family framework zeroed in on a significant job. Until 2001, the primary issue of the Family Communication Research Journal, Family Communication Magazine, was given. Family correspondence is more than the field of correspondence analysts in the family. Examination on family correspondence is normally done by individuals in brain science, humanism, and family research, to give some examples models. However, as the popular family correspondence researcher Leslie Baxter stated, it is the focal point of this intelligent semantic creation measure making the grant of family correspondence special. In the field of in-home correspondence, correspondence is normally not founded on autonomous messages from one sender to one beneficiary, yet dependent on the dynamic interdependency of data shared among families It is conceptualized. The focal point of this methodology is on the shared trait of semantic development inside family frameworks. As such, producing doesn’t happen in vacuum, however it happens in a wide scope of ages and social exchange.
Standards are rules end up being followed when performing work to agree to a given objective. Hierarchical achievement relies significantly upon compelling correspondence. So as to successfully impart, it is important to follow a few standards and rules. Coming up next are rules to guarantee powerful correspondence: clearness: lucidity of data is a significant guideline of correspondence. For beneficiaries to know the message plainly, the messages ought to be sorted out in a basic language. To guarantee that beneficiaries can without much of a stretch comprehend the importance of the message, the sender needs to impart unmistakably and unhesitatingly so the beneficiary can plainly and unquestionably comprehend the data.>