{br} STUCK with your assignment? {br} When is it due? {br} Get FREE assistance. Page Title: {title}{br} Page URL: {url}
UK: +44 748 007-0908, USA: +1 917 810-5386 [email protected]

As you are reading Hamlet, create descriptions of Hamlet’s characteristics, and gather quotes and examples that support this description. For example you might add the characteristic, “Melancholy,” and cite the quote, “I.iii.133-134 – ‘How weary, stale, flat, and unprofitable / Seem to me all the uses of this world!’”
Use the text and drawing tools to create your web. You will be adding to this Characterization Collection during each act of the play, and you will download it as you prepare your Character Analysis Essay at the end of this unit.
Remember to try to read Hamlet’s character empathetically, and, if possible, try to use him as a mirror for your own experience.
Act 1:
Ac 2:
Act 3:
Act 4:
Act 5:

Act 2
Complete a 200-250 word forum post. Your post should address one of the following questions:

  1. What is your response to Hamlet’s character so far? Is he a noble character or a “dull and muddy-mettled rascal”? Do you believe he is meant to be a sympathetic character, or a character to be reviled? Cite specific examples and quotes in order to support your belief.
  2. Many different sides of Hamlet’s character have been revealed in Act 1 and 2. Which aspect of his character do you believe to be the true Hamlet? Which sides are not his genuine self? Include specific examples in order to support your belief.

Act 5
“Have at you now!” Forum

Hamlet is a play that has caused quite a bit of confrontation between literary scholars over the years. Several issues have been particularly contentious, and the purpose of this forum assignment is to delve into some of those discussions. Please remain respectful as you “have at” your fellow students in this discussion.

Complete a 200-250 word forum post. Your post should address one of the following questions:

  1. Was Hamlet actually “mad” or merely pretending? Provide specific examples from the text in order to support your position.
  2. What was the nature of Hamlet and Ophelia’s relationship? Did Hamlet actually love her or not? Had they been intimate or not? Provide specific examples from the text in order to support your belief.
  3. How old is Hamlet in the play? Is he 16 or 30? If he is 16, how do you explain the conversation with the gravedigger? If he is 30, why was he not made king when his father died? Provide specific examples from the text in order to support your belief.
  4. Would Hamlet have been a good king? Provide specific examples from the text in order to support your belief.
  5. Was Gertrude guilty of anything at all, or is Hamlet’s rage at her misguided? Provide specific examples from the text in order to support your belief.
  6. Did Ophelia commit suicide, or was her death a tragic accident? Provide specific examples from the text in order to support your belief.
  7. Who is the most honourable character in Hamlet and why? Provide specific examples from the text in order to support your belief.

Act 1
For this activity, you will use a personal writing style to communicate your own connections and encounters with Act I of Hamlet using one of the prompts below.
You do not have to use formal paragraphs to convey your thinking, but try to present your thoughts in an organized and logical way. Be as personal and vulnerable as you feel safe being.
The maximum length for this personal writing assignment is 300 words.
1) Hamlet experiences intense emotions, some of which would be socially unacceptable to show outwardly. By restraining himself, is he being less than true to his own self, or is he merely behaving as he is expected to as the Prince of Denmark?
2) In what ways have you wrestled with understanding who your true self is? Are there times when you have portrayed a different person on the outside than you are feeling on the inside? Connect these personal experiences to your reading of Hamlet.
3) Hamlet says, “But break, my heart, for I must hold my tongue.” Is his silence wise or a betrayal of his true self? Is passion something that should be expressed freely or hidden from sight?

Act 3
Consider each of the following questions, and write an answer to at least two of them in the workspace provided.
For each written response that you choose, do a 75 to 100-word quick-write.

  1. What do you think Hamlet’s true feelings for Ophelia are? What evidence do you have to support your belief?
  2. The theological position of the play is that the state of one’s soul at the moment of death will determine a person’s eternal destiny. Compare and contrast this view with your own beliefs about what happens when a person dies.
  3. Contrast Hamlet’s reaction to Polonius’ death to Claudius’ response to his brother’s murder. Whose response do you believe to be more appropriate or noble?
  4. Discuss the irony of Hamlet refusing to kill the king while he is in prayer. What does his decision reveal about Hamlet’s theological beliefs and about his desire for revenge?
  5. Hamlet verbally attacks Gertrude mercilessly, to the point where his father’s ghost comes back to intercede for her. Do you believe that Gertrude is innocent of wrongdoing, or do you think she is guilty of what Hamlet is accusing her of?

Act 4
Using the workspace provided, write a literary analysis for Hamlet’s soliloquy in Act 4 Scene 4, lines 31-65.
Your analysis should be between 200 and 300 words. This is meant to be a short assignment which will be practice for your final literary essay.
Your analysis should contain some or all of the following components:

  1. A very brief summary of what Hamlet says in modern English, using your own words;
  2. A critical analysis of how this speech reveals Hamlet’s character;
  3. An examination of Hamlet’s view of “honor” in this speech;
  4. A consideration of whether Hamlet thinks his inaction in revenge is wisdom or cowardice.

Sample Answer

Compelling correspondence is essential to the achievement all things considered but since of the changing idea of the present working environments, successful correspondence turns out to be more troublesome, and because of the numerous impediments that will permit beneficiaries to acknowledge the plan of the sender It is restricted. Misguided judgments.In spite of the fact that correspondence inside the association is rarely completely open, numerous straightforward arrangements can be executed to advance the effect of these hindrances.

Concerning specific contextual analysis, two significant correspondence standards, correspondence channel determination and commotion are self-evident. This course presents the standards of correspondence, the act of general correspondence, and different speculations to all the more likely comprehend the correspondence exchanges experienced in regular daily existence. The standards and practices that you learn in this course give the premise to additionally learning and correspondence.

This course starts with an outline of the correspondence cycle, the method of reasoning and hypothesis. In resulting modules of the course, we will look at explicit use of relational connections in close to home and expert life. These incorporate relational correspondence, bunch correspondence and dynamic, authoritative correspondence in the work environment or relational correspondence. Rule of Business Communication In request to make correspondence viable, it is important to follow a few rules and standards. Seven of them are fundamental and applicable, and these are clear, finished, brief, obliging, right, thought to be, concrete. These standards are frequently called 7C for business correspondence. The subtleties of these correspondence standards are examined underneath: Politeness Principle: When conveying, we should build up a cordial relationship with every individual who sends data to us.

To be inviting and polite is indistinguishable, and politeness requires an insightful and amicable activity against others. Axioms are notable that gracious “pay of graciousness is the main thing to win everything”. Correspondence staff ought to consistently remember this. The accompanying standards may assist with improving courtesy:Preliminary considering correspondence with family All glad families have the mystery of progress. This achievement originates from a strong establishment of closeness and closeness. Indeed, through private correspondence these cozy family connections become all the more intently. Correspondence is the foundation of different affiliations, building solid partners of obedient devotion, improving family way of life, and assisting with accomplishing satisfaction (Gosche, p. 1). In any case, so as to keep up an amicable relationship, a few families experienced tumultuous encounters. Correspondence in the family is an intricate and alluring marvel. Correspondence between families isn’t restricted to single messages between families or verbal correspondence.

It is a unique cycle that oversees force, closeness and limits, cohesiveness and flexibility of route frameworks, and makes pictures, topics, stories, ceremonies, rules, jobs, making implications, making a feeling of family life An intelligent cycle that makes a model. This model has passed ages. Notwithstanding the view as a family and family automatic framework, one of the greatest exploration establishments in between family correspondence centers around a family correspondence model. Family correspondence model (FCP) hypothesis clarifies why families impart in their own specific manner dependent on one another ‘s psychological direction. Early FCP research established in media research is keen on how families handle broad communications data. Family correspondence was perceived as an exceptional scholastic exploration field by the National Communications Association in 1989. Family correspondence researchers were at first impacted by family research, social brain science, and relational hypothesis, before long built up the hypothesis and began research in a family framework zeroed in on a significant job. Until 2001, the primary issue of the Family Communication Research Journal, Family Communication Magazine, was given. Family correspondence is more than the field of correspondence analysts in the family. Examination on family correspondence is normally done by individuals in brain science, humanism, and family research, to give some examples models. However, as the popular family correspondence researcher Leslie Baxter stated, it is the focal point of this intelligent semantic creation measure making the grant of family correspondence special. In the field of in-home correspondence, correspondence is normally not founded on autonomous messages from one sender to one beneficiary, yet dependent on the dynamic interdependency of data shared among families It is conceptualized. The focal point of this methodology is on the shared trait of semantic development inside family frameworks. As such, producing doesn’t happen in vacuum, however it happens in a wide scope of ages and social exchange.

Standards are rules end up being followed when performing work to agree to a given objective. Hierarchical achievement relies significantly upon compelling correspondence. So as to successfully impart, it is important to follow a few standards and rules. Coming up next are rules to guarantee powerful correspondence: clearness: lucidity of data is a significant guideline of correspondence. For beneficiaries to know the message plainly, the messages ought to be sorted out in a basic language. To guarantee that beneficiaries can without much of a stretch comprehend the importance of the message, the sender needs to impart unmistakably and unhesitatingly so the beneficiary can plainly and unquestionably comprehend the data.>

Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!