Entrepreneurship in the Global Environment

Order Description

MGT6A3 – Entrepreneurship in the Global Environment
Individual Project Assignment – Comparing Entrepreneurs from different Industries
This assignment is due on or before 16.00 hours on Monday, 8 December 2014 and is to be submitted electronically via Blackboard. Your soft copy submission must be in either Microsoft Word or pdf format. Please keep a copy of your submission.
Your assignment must
• compare entrepreneurs from two different industries and countries
• be your own original work (please speak with me if you have any doubts about what this means).
• have all relevant information on the cover (name, student number, module name and number, assignment
title, due date, word count).
• be not longer than 3500 words (within 10%) .
• have proper references using the Harvard system of referencing.
• be written in formal English – although there are no specific marks allocated for grammar, punctuation and
spelling, overall impression is important and can affect marks awarded. Concise and cogent arguments are encouraged.
The assignment will be marked according to the following criteria and considerations:
• the degree of critical evaluation and analysis in the arguments made (descriptive submissions are likely to receive low marks).
• scope of reading and research demonstrated in the answer by appropriate referencing.
• the degree to which your arguments are underpinned by theory and research evidence.
• clarity and structure of the arguments (formal essay format with appropriate introduction and conclusions
should be used).
• use of appropriate examples.
• overall presentation, including spelling, grammar and punctuation.
Distribution of marks for the assignment:
• 10% Presentation and Layout
• 10% Study candidate background
• 20% Discussion of rationality and justification of choice of candidate
• 40% Discussion on the choice of model selected and analytical discussion on findings
• 20% Reflective discussion on learning module outcomes
Your assignment requires you to identify 2 entrepreneurs of your choice, and
a. provide a profile brief of the entrepreneurs you have selected for comparison;
b. using concepts and models learn from module MGT6A3, explain why your choice of persons can be classed
as entrepreneurs;
c. explain and discuss what is your choice of critique for comparison and why the two entrepreneurs are
worthy of recognition; and,
d. critically reflect on the modules learning outcomes and explain how you have achieve them through the
completion of the module’s individual assignment.

MGT6A3 Entrepreneurship in
the Global Environment
Module Handbook
2014/2015
MGT6A3 Entrepreneurship
in the Global Environment
1
MGT6A3 Entrepreneurship in the Global Environment
1. Factual information
Module title
Entrepreneurship in the Global Environment
Level
6
Module tuto
r
J
onathan Liu, Geoffery Darnton
& Michel Ben-David
Credit value
10
5 ECTS
Module type
Pathway Elective (GBDM at Level 6)
Option (BAGM at Level 6)
Notional
learning hours
100
2. Rationale for the module and its links with other modules
As the world’s economies develop and prosper, the
integration of economies will see a continuation
and intensification of changes in
company management, as creativity and innovation skills become more
dominant forces in the struggle to maintain market sh
are. The entrepreneur is likely to play a more
significant part in the growth and development of na
tional economies. In addition, the model of social
entrepreneurship as the embedded sustainability pers
pective is used to question current and future
roles of entrepreneurs. This module provides st
udents with another crucial component in their
understanding of global business, leading on from
the level 5 module Managing New Ventures. There
are thematic links with the stra
tegy, management, and HR modules.
3. Aims of the module
This module examines the foundations, theory and scop
e of entrepreneurship, and identifies significant
entrepreneurial trends in the global
trading environment whilst critically
reviewing the characteristics of
the entrepreneur, so students will come away with a cl
ear perspective on this crucial aspect of business.
Students will also explore the nature of rapidly growin
g companies, the role of
the entrepreneur in such
environments and be able to explain rapid-growth st
rategies for entrepreneuria
l companies. The effects
of the dynamic trading environmen
t of the 21st century on the entrepreneur of the 20th century are
considered, as well as the management of change in th
e entrepreneurial company.
Social responsibility is
an important component of this mo
dule, and students will evaluate th
e impact of models of social
entrepreneurship on fulfilling societ
al and ethical concerns in the modern era. Overall, upon successful
completion, students will be able to critically analys
e and comment with regards to the characteristics of
the entrepreneur, the impact of social entrepreneur
ship, finally linking up with management of family-
run businesses often seen as living
examples of entrepreneurialism in ac
tion. The principles expressed in
this module apply to all geographies and all si
zes of company includin
g global organizations.
4. Pre-requisite modules or specified entry requirements
Principles of Human Resource Management
Sustainability in Global Business
5. Intended learning outcomes
A. Knowledge and understanding
A
t the end of the module, learners will be expected to:
A13.
Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the
factors affecting strategic decision-making in
business practice and its impact on organisations.
A15.
Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of cros
s-cultural and global dimensions in managerial,
organisational, and business issues.
B. Cognitive skills
A
t the end of the module learners will be expected to:
B18.
Integrate and evaluate complex information and data from a variety of sources.

PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT 🙂

Compelling correspondence is essential to the achievement all things considered but since of the changing idea of the present working environments, successful correspondence turns out to be more troublesome, and because of the numerous impediments that will permit beneficiaries to acknowledge the plan of the sender It is restricted. Misguided judgments.In spite of the fact that correspondence inside the association is rarely completely open, numerous straightforward arrangements can be executed to advance the effect of these hindrances.

Concerning specific contextual analysis, two significant correspondence standards, correspondence channel determination and commotion are self-evident. This course presents the standards of correspondence, the act of general correspondence, and different speculations to all the more likely comprehend the correspondence exchanges experienced in regular daily existence. The standards and practices that you learn in this course give the premise to additionally learning and correspondence.

This question has been answered

This course starts with an outline of the correspondence cycle, the method of reasoning and hypothesis. In resulting modules of the course, we will look at explicit use of relational connections in close to home and expert life. These incorporate relational correspondence, bunch correspondence and dynamic, authoritative correspondence in the work environment or relational correspondence. Rule of Business Communication In request to make correspondence viable, it is important to follow a few rules and standards. Seven of them are fundamental and applicable, and these are clear, finished, brief, obliging, right, thought to be, concrete. These standards are frequently called 7C for business correspondence. The subtleties of these correspondence standards are examined underneath: Politeness Principle: When conveying, we should build up a cordial relationship with every individual who sends data to us.

To be inviting and polite is indistinguishable, and politeness requires an insightful and amicable activity against others. Axioms are notable that gracious “pay of graciousness is the main thing to win everything”. Correspondence staff ought to consistently remember this. The accompanying standards may assist with improving courtesy:Preliminary considering correspondence with family All glad families have the mystery of progress. This achievement originates from a strong establishment of closeness and closeness. Indeed, through private correspondence these cozy family connections become all the more intently. Correspondence is the foundation of different affiliations, building solid partners of obedient devotion, improving family way of life, and assisting with accomplishing satisfaction (Gosche, p. 1). In any case, so as to keep up an amicable relationship, a few families experienced tumultuous encounters. Correspondence in the family is an intricate and alluring marvel. Correspondence between families isn’t restricted to single messages between families or verbal correspondence.

It is a unique cycle that oversees force, closeness and limits, cohesiveness and flexibility of route frameworks, and makes pictures, topics, stories, ceremonies, rules, jobs, making implications, making a feeling of family life An intelligent cycle that makes a model. This model has passed ages. Notwithstanding the view as a family and family automatic framework, one of the greatest exploration establishments in between family correspondence centers around a family correspondence model. Family correspondence model (FCP) hypothesis clarifies why families impart in their own specific manner dependent on one another ‘s psychological direction. Early FCP research established in media research is keen on how families handle broad communications data. Family correspondence was perceived as an exceptional scholastic exploration field by the National Communications Association in 1989. Family correspondence researchers were at first impacted by family research, social brain science, and relational hypothesis, before long built up the hypothesis and began research in a family framework zeroed in on a significant job. Until 2001, the primary issue of the Family Communication Research Journal, Family Communication Magazine, was given. Family correspondence is more than the field of correspondence analysts in the family. Examination on family correspondence is normally done by individuals in brain science, humanism, and family research, to give some examples models. However, as the popular family correspondence researcher Leslie Baxter stated, it is the focal point of this intelligent semantic creation measure making the grant of family correspondence special. In the field of in-home correspondence, correspondence is normally not founded on autonomous messages from one sender to one beneficiary, yet dependent on the dynamic interdependency of data shared among families It is conceptualized. The focal point of this methodology is on the shared trait of semantic development inside family frameworks. As such, producing doesn’t happen in vacuum, however it happens in a wide scope of ages and social exchange.

Standards are rules end up being followed when performing work to agree to a given objective. Hierarchical achievement relies significantly upon compelling correspondence. So as to successfully impart, it is important to follow a few standards and rules. Coming up next are rules to guarantee powerful correspondence: clearness: lucidity of data is a significant guideline of correspondence. For beneficiaries to know the message plainly, the messages ought to be sorted out in a basic language. To guarantee that beneficiaries can without much of a stretch comprehend the importance of the message, the sender needs to impart unmistakably and unhesitatingly so the beneficiary can plainly and unquestionably comprehend the data.>

Entrepreneurship in the Global Environment

Sample Answer

Our Services

Secure Checkout

Our Advantages