{br} STUCK with your assignment? {br} When is it due? {br} Get FREE assistance. Page Title: {title}{br} Page URL: {url}
UK: +44 748 007-0908, USA: +1 917 810-5386 [email protected]

Critically examine the value of brand semiotics marketing in the contemporary hospitality sector.

ASSESSMENT AND FEEDBACK

This is how and when you will be given feedback on your performance…

•    formative feedback will be given on an ongoing basis as required;

•    formative feedback will be given regarding the structure of the assignment;

•    formal written feedback and marks will be provided at the end of the module for the completed assignment

To achieve a pass, you will…

•    have to develop the ability to work individually to research, prepare and present sector specific marketing information;

•    have to research a particular marketing concept/practice in depth in the literature and be able to apply the chosen concept/practice to sector. This review should be critical and analytical rather than descriptive;

•    have the ability to present your written work in a fluent style, with competent referencing.

LEARNING RESOURCES

MARKETING JOURNALS & MAGAZINES

•    Journal of Marketing
•    European Journal of Marketing
•    Journal of Consumer Research
•    Journal of Marketing Management
•    Journal of Social Marketing
•    Marketing Intelligence and Planning
•    Marketing Theory
•    Psychology & Marketing
•    Journal of Brand Management
•    Journal of Consumer Behaviour
•    Consumption Markets and Culture
•    Journal of Consumer Culture
•    Journal of Marketing Research
•    The Journal of Services Marketing
•    International Journal of Research in Marketing
•    Social Marketing Quarterly
•    Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing
•    Journal of Hospitality Marketing and Management
•    Journal of Consumer Policy
•    World Advertising Research Centre
•    Marketing Week
•    Cases in Public Health Communication and Marketing
•    Brandchannel.com

Recommended Texts

Tresidder, R & Hirst, C. (2012) Marketing in Food, Hospitality, Tourism and Events: A Critical Approach; Goodfellow Publishers

Solomon, M. Marshal, G., Stuart, E. et al. (2013) Marketing: Real People, Real Decisions, 2nd European Edition; Prentice Hall, London

Penaloza, L., Toulouse, L., & Visconti, L (eds) (2011) Marketing Management a Cultural Perspective, Routledge

Hollensen, S. (2010) Global Marketing: A Decision Orientated Approach, Prentice Hall
Hastings, G & Domegan, C (2014). Social marketing: From tunes to symphonies. [online]. London, Routledge. (For Nutrition with Public Health Management)

Supplementary and Alternative Texts
Oswald, L (2012) Marketing Semiotics; Signs, Strategies and Brand Value, Oxford University Press
Baker, M.J. (2000) Marketing Strategy and Management (3rd Edition), Macmillan
Baker, M.J. (ed) (2003) The Marketing Book (7th Edition), Butterworh Heinemann
Bradley, F. (2001) International Marketing Strategy (4th Edition) Prentice Hall
Christopher, M. Payne, A. and Ballantyne, D. (1997) Relationship Marketing: Bringing Quality, Customer Service, and Marketing Together, Butterworth Heinemann
De Pelsmacker, P., Geuens, M., Van den Bergh, J. (2007) Marketing communications, A European perspective (3rd Edition), Prentice Hall
Doole, I. and Lowe, R. (2004) International Marketing Strategy Analysis, Development and Implementation, Thompson Learning
Horner, S. and Swarbrooke, J. (2007) Consumer Behaviour in Tourism (2nd Edition) Butterworth Heinemann
Hsu, C.H.C. and Powers, T (2002) Marketing Hospitality, Wiley
Gilligan, C. and Wilson, R.M.S. (2003) Strategic Marketing Planning, Butterworth Heinemann
Jeannet, J.P. and Hennessy, H.D. (2004) Global Marketing Strategies (6th Edition) Houghton Mifflin
Kotler, P. (2000) Marketing Management Prentice Hall
Kotler, P., Bowen, J., Makens, J. (2006) Marketing for hospitality and tourism (4th Edition) Prentice Hall
Lancaster, G. and Reynolds, P. (2002) Marketing, Macmillan
Lovelock, C., Wirtz, J., Chew, P. (2009) Essentials of services marketing, Prentice Hall
Mercer, D. (1998) Marketing Strategy: The Challenge of the External Environment, Sage Publications
Middleton, T.C. (2001) Marketing in Travel and Tourism (3rd Edition), Butterworth Heinemann *(All Tourism students) NB: 2009 Edition available use if possible.
Nyheim, P., McFadden, F., Connolly, D. (2005) Technology strategies for the hospitality industry, Prentice Hall, London
Paliwoda, S.J. (2003) International Marketing (4th Edition), Butterworth Heinemann
Solomon, M., Bamossy, G., Askegaard, S. and Hogg, M. (2010) Consumer Behaviour: A European Perspective; Prentice Hall, London
Usunier, J.C. and Lee, J.A. (2005) Marketing Across Cultures, Pearson Education
Westwood, J. (2000) How to Write a Marketing Plan, (2nd Edition), Kogan Page

Periodicals – The following journals are indicative only – you will find that the library subscribes to a wide range of journals, with many available online.
Journal of Marketing
Journal of Retailing
Journal of Consumer Research
Annals of Tourism Research
International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management
Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing
Cornell Hotel & Restaurant Administration Quarterly.
European Journal of Marketing
International Journal of Marketing
Journal of Marketing Management
Journal of Brand Management
Marketing Intelligence and Planning

International Industry Report Sources (All available in library, please collect library guide on Hospitality Management International and Global Information Sources, a copy will also be available on Blackboard)
Passport Global Market Information Database
Mintel Global Market Navigator
Key Note
Mintel Oxygen – Travel & Tourism, new China Reports
Business Source Premier

International Company Information Sources
PI Navigator
Amadeus
Business Source Premier
Nexis UK

NB – There are many internet resources available however, be cautious when using these and ensure that they are legitimate and valid sites

DETAILED ASSESSMENT SPECIFICATION

Module Title:    Marketing
Assessment Title:    Critical Written Review
Weighting:    100% (4000 words)

Marketing Assessment

4000 Word Critical Review (Essay Format)

Topic:

Critically examine the value of brand semiotics marketing in the contemporary hospitality sector.

Structure of this essay

1. Introduction (300 words)
2.Critical review of the current state in the literature on brand semiotics theories. (1300 words)
2.1
2.2
2.3
3. A review of brand semiotics concept/ practice has/ is being/ being/ in contemporary hospitability industry. (1400 words)- with some examples analysis
3.1
3.2
3.3
4. Critical the value of brand semiotics practice /practice whilst marking recommendations for its use in the further. (1000 words)
4.1
4.2
5.Conclusion   (200-300 words)

You should carry this out in three stages:

1.    A critical review of the current state of thinking in the literature on your marketing concept/practice.
(1,500 words)

2. A review of how your marketing concept/practice has/is been/being embedded in organisations/initiatives in your sector.
(1,500 words)

3.  Critique the value of your marketing concept/practice whilst making recommendations for its use in the future.
(1,000 words)

Assessment criterion 1 – Structure 10%
70+%    56-69%%    40-55%    below40%
Excellent integration of introduction, main body of review & conclusion.

Very well developed and logical argument with creative links between ideas/sections.

Arguments in a logical sequence.    Good integration of introduction, main body of review & conclusion.

Well developed and logical argument with clear links between ideas/sections.

Arguments largely in a logical sequence.    Some integration of introduction, main body of review & conclusion.

A developed and logical argument with links between ideas/sections.

Arguments often listed rather than in a logical sequence.    Poor integration of introduction, main body of review & conclusion.

Arguments often not in a logical sequence.

Assessment criterion 2 – Presentation Style 10%
70+%    56-69%%    40-55%    below40%
Very high academic & professional standard.

Creative & stimulating.    Good academic & professional standard.

Creative & interesting.    Appropriate academic & professional standard.

Engaging but obvious.    Below an appropriate academic & professional standard.

Fails to engage.

Assessment criterion 3 – Quality of Arguments 50%
70+%    56-69%%    40-55%    below40%
Comprehensive review of the current literature on your marketing concept/practice*.
Draws on a wide range of sources.  Literature is fully analysed and evaluated.

A thorough and insightful review of how your marketing concept/practice* is embedded within organisations/initiatives in your sector.

A thorough analysis of the value of your marketing concept/practice* for your organisation/initiative.

Recommendations are comprehensive and creative.    Good quality review of the current literature on your marketing concept/practice*.  Draws on a range of sources.   Literature is clearly analysed and evaluated.

A clear and detailed review of how your marketing concept/practice* is embedded within organisations/initiatives in your sector.

A clear and detailed analysis of the value of your marketing concept/practice* for your organisation/initiative.

Recommendations are comprehensive.
A general review of the current literature on your marketing concept/practice* with some analysis and evaluation. Draws on main theories and concepts.

A review of how your marketing concept/practice* is embedded within organisations/initiatives in your sector.

The value of your marketing concept/practice* for your organisation/initiative is reasonably analysed.

A range of relevant recommendations are presented.
Limited and superficial review of the current literature on your marketing concept/practice*.  Mostly fails to explore key theories and concepts.

A limited and superficial review of how your marketing concept/practice* is embedded within organisations/initiatives in your sector.

Limited and superficial analysis of the value of your marketing concept/practice* for your organisation/initiative.

Recommendations are limited in scope and superficial in nature.

* = Marketing concept/practice to be agreed with your tutor from the selection offered in the brief

Assessment criterion 4 – Research 30%
70+%    56-69%    40-55%    below40%
Evidence of wide & appropriate research.

Draws on a wide range of theories and sources.  High quality sources used.

Accurate referencing with comprehensive reference list.     Evidence of wide & appropriate research.

Draws on the main theories and sources. Generally high quality sources used.

Accurate referencing with appropriate reference list.    Evidence of appropriate research.

Draws on relevant theory. Some high quality sources used.

Accurate referencing with reference list.     Little evidence of appropriate research.

Little reference to ideas or theory.

Inaccurate referencing.  Limited reference list.

PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT 🙂

Sample Answer

Compelling correspondence is essential to the achievement all things considered but since of the changing idea of the present working environments, successful correspondence turns out to be more troublesome, and because of the numerous impediments that will permit beneficiaries to acknowledge the plan of the sender It is restricted. Misguided judgments.In spite of the fact that correspondence inside the association is rarely completely open, numerous straightforward arrangements can be executed to advance the effect of these hindrances.

Concerning specific contextual analysis, two significant correspondence standards, correspondence channel determination and commotion are self-evident. This course presents the standards of correspondence, the act of general correspondence, and different speculations to all the more likely comprehend the correspondence exchanges experienced in regular daily existence. The standards and practices that you learn in this course give the premise to additionally learning and correspondence.

This course starts with an outline of the correspondence cycle, the method of reasoning and hypothesis. In resulting modules of the course, we will look at explicit use of relational connections in close to home and expert life. These incorporate relational correspondence, bunch correspondence and dynamic, authoritative correspondence in the work environment or relational correspondence. Rule of Business Communication In request to make correspondence viable, it is important to follow a few rules and standards. Seven of them are fundamental and applicable, and these are clear, finished, brief, obliging, right, thought to be, concrete. These standards are frequently called 7C for business correspondence. The subtleties of these correspondence standards are examined underneath: Politeness Principle: When conveying, we should build up a cordial relationship with every individual who sends data to us.

To be inviting and polite is indistinguishable, and politeness requires an insightful and amicable activity against others. Axioms are notable that gracious “pay of graciousness is the main thing to win everything”. Correspondence staff ought to consistently remember this. The accompanying standards may assist with improving courtesy:Preliminary considering correspondence with family All glad families have the mystery of progress. This achievement originates from a strong establishment of closeness and closeness. Indeed, through private correspondence these cozy family connections become all the more intently. Correspondence is the foundation of different affiliations, building solid partners of obedient devotion, improving family way of life, and assisting with accomplishing satisfaction (Gosche, p. 1). In any case, so as to keep up an amicable relationship, a few families experienced tumultuous encounters. Correspondence in the family is an intricate and alluring marvel. Correspondence between families isn’t restricted to single messages between families or verbal correspondence.

It is a unique cycle that oversees force, closeness and limits, cohesiveness and flexibility of route frameworks, and makes pictures, topics, stories, ceremonies, rules, jobs, making implications, making a feeling of family life An intelligent cycle that makes a model. This model has passed ages. Notwithstanding the view as a family and family automatic framework, one of the greatest exploration establishments in between family correspondence centers around a family correspondence model. Family correspondence model (FCP) hypothesis clarifies why families impart in their own specific manner dependent on one another ‘s psychological direction. Early FCP research established in media research is keen on how families handle broad communications data. Family correspondence was perceived as an exceptional scholastic exploration field by the National Communications Association in 1989. Family correspondence researchers were at first impacted by family research, social brain science, and relational hypothesis, before long built up the hypothesis and began research in a family framework zeroed in on a significant job. Until 2001, the primary issue of the Family Communication Research Journal, Family Communication Magazine, was given. Family correspondence is more than the field of correspondence analysts in the family. Examination on family correspondence is normally done by individuals in brain science, humanism, and family research, to give some examples models. However, as the popular family correspondence researcher Leslie Baxter stated, it is the focal point of this intelligent semantic creation measure making the grant of family correspondence special. In the field of in-home correspondence, correspondence is normally not founded on autonomous messages from one sender to one beneficiary, yet dependent on the dynamic interdependency of data shared among families It is conceptualized. The focal point of this methodology is on the shared trait of semantic development inside family frameworks. As such, producing doesn’t happen in vacuum, however it happens in a wide scope of ages and social exchange.

Standards are rules end up being followed when performing work to agree to a given objective. Hierarchical achievement relies significantly upon compelling correspondence. So as to successfully impart, it is important to follow a few standards and rules. Coming up next are rules to guarantee powerful correspondence: clearness: lucidity of data is a significant guideline of correspondence. For beneficiaries to know the message plainly, the messages ought to be sorted out in a basic language. To guarantee that beneficiaries can without much of a stretch comprehend the importance of the message, the sender needs to impart unmistakably and unhesitatingly so the beneficiary can plainly and unquestionably comprehend the data.>

Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!