Business and Management

Order Description

Motivation should include Process and Content theories

Assessment requirements and submission dates:

Assessment 2: Final essay (1800 words excluding bibliography/reference list at the end). (The final essay is worth 70% of the total mark for the module).
Submission date: Your Final essay plan must be submitted electronically via Turnitin Blackboard by Final Essay submission date Deadline: 17th December 2014. 13.00 hr (Submit electronically via Turnitin).

The Final ESSAY (2nd piece of assessment worth 70%

Final Essay length (excluding references and bibliography):1800 words (+/- 10%) You must keep your work within the word limit or penalties apply. Please note that you should make reference to reading you have done when answering the questions.

Choose ONE of the following questions to answer:

1. “Which motivation theory do you regard as the most powerful and helpful in explaining how motivation works and why? Illustrate your answer with reference to one organisation which appears to support the theory you have chosen”

2. “What is stress at work? Set out the main causes of stress at work and explores some strategies for reducing the impact of stress on individuals and organisations. Give examples to support your points”.

3. 4. Choose ONE of the themes of the module (described on pp 8. 9 and 10) and describe your understanding of its importance in organisational life, giving examples.

4. Describe TWO of the ‘Big Five’ personality traits and consider the relevance of them to TWO jobs/occupations. Do you think these traits can be measured?

Assessment Guidance:

Final essay Guidance and Assessment Criteria

An essay of 1800 words (excluding reference list at end).

Assessment criteria for the final essay are:

•   Focus on question set;
•   Quality of argument and analysis
•   The depth and extent of your knowledge of relevant concepts, writers and ideas;
•   The depth and extent of your knowledge of relevant reading and research;
•   originality in discussion and analysis.
•   ability to write clearly in a recognised academic style, which is suitable for essay writing,
•   ability to reference appropriately.

The assessment criteria above mean in simple terms that you must show you have knowledge of what has been taught on the module, and that you can use this to answer a question in an informed and structured way, presenting arguments in a clear and logical academic way and using relevant literature/research.

Grading indication for final essay (worth 70% of module mark)

70+ Most of the following: Clear evidence of independent and original thinking in arguments and analysis; evidence of wide or in-depth reading/research to support points made; wide or deep understanding of relevant concepts, writers and ideas; mastery of academic style; fluently written and very well-argued essay.

60+ Most of the following: Clear focus on question set and a well-written answer in clear English; Selective and appropriate use of research or reading material, correctly referenced; Very good identification of, and ability to apply appropriate concepts and theories to case studies or experiences;

50+ Most of the following: Mostly focused on question and evidence of an attempt at a logical essay structure;
Correctly referenced research material/reading used, relevant to the question set; identification of some of the concepts/writers and appropriate essay style; Descriptive rather than analytical, with ideas presented as unsupported opinions

40+ Most of the following: Attempt to answer the question set but only partially focussed on the question set; disorganised in presentation of ideas; Little use of reference material and little evidence of reading; inadequate referencing;.

Failure (less than 40%) Two or more of the following: Lack of understanding of question set and/or material used; substantial errors and inadequate length, evidence of serious plagiarism., lack of any evidence of reading/understanding of concepts and ideas covered.
Assessment format:

The required format for the presentation of your assessment (both pieces: essay plan and essay) is as follows:

Front page to show: Name, Assignment title, Module code/title, Seminar leader’s name, Due Date.

Reading List

The core text is recommended as an overview in relation to the course. It is important to have constant access to this textbook throughout the course. The other texts mentioned are supplementary and apply to particular areas of the course but it is very important that you refer to as many of these as possible if you aim to gain the most from the course. In addition, it is important to draw on contemporary examples taken from wider reading such as relevant journals, newspapers, television programmes, and also your own experience of organisations. You will be able to use the core textbook on other modules in future years of your degree.

Core textbook (essential reading):

King, D and S.Lawley (2013) ‘ Organizational Behaviour’, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

It is also a useful textbook for your second and third year modules in Organisational Behaviour (OB). Once you have purchased this text you will also have access to the student online material provided by the publisher.

Further Suggested Reading:

Arnold, J., Randall, R., Patterson, F, Silvester, J, Roberston, I,.T., Cooper, C., Burnes, B, Harris, D., Axtell., C and Den Hartog, D. (2010) (5th edition) Work Psychology: Understanding Human Behaviour in the Workplace, Prentice Hall: London.

Blosi, W., Cook, C., Hunsaker, P. (2007) (2nd European edition), Management and Organisational Behaviour, McGraw-Hill: Maidenhead.

Bratton, J., Forshaw. C, Callinan, Sawchuk, P and Corbett, M. (2010) Work and Organizational Behaviour: Understanding the Workplace Palgrave.

Buelens, M., Sinding, K and Waldstrom, C. (2011) (Fourth Edition) Organisational Behaviour: McGraw-Hill Education: UK

Cooper, C.L. (1998) ‘Working in a Short-term Culture’, Management Today, February: 5.

Dick, P. and Ellis, S. (2006) Introduction to Organizational Behaviour (3rd Ed) Mc Graw Hill: Berkshire.

Fincham, R and Rhodes, P. (2005) (Fourth Edition) Principles of Organizational Behaviour: Oxford University Press: Oxford.

Fineman, S., Gabriel, Y. and Sims, D. (2010) (4th edition) Organizing and Organizations, Sage: London.

Grint, K. (2005) (3rd edition) The Sociology of Work: An Introduction, Polity Press.
Hollway, W. (1991) Work Psychology and Organisational Behaviour: Managing the Individual at Work, Sage Publications: London.

Huczynski, A. and Buchanan, D. (2010) Organizational Behaviour: An Introductory Text (7th Edition), London: Prentice Hall.

Matthewman, L, Rose, A & Hetherington (2009) Work Psychology. Oxford University Press.

Robbins, S.P. (2009) (10th edition) Essentials of Organizational Behaviour, Prentice Hall: London.

Robbins, S.P. (2010) (14th edition) Organizational Behaviour: Concepts, Controversies, Applications, Prentice Hall: London.

Rollinson, D. (2008) (4th edition) Organisational Behaviour and Analysis: An Integrated Approach, Prentice Hall: London.

Sennett, R. (1998) The Corrosion of Character: The Personal Consequences of Work. Norton and Company: London.

Thompson, P. and McHugh, D. (2009) (4th edition) Work Organisations: A Critical Introduction, Macmillan Press:Basingstoke.

Wagner, J.A. and Hollenbeck, J.R. (2005) (5th edition) Organizational Behaviour: Securing Competitive Advantage, Prentice Hall: London.

Wilson, F.M. ( ) (3rd Edition) Organisational Behaviour and Work

Journals

Relevant journals to research for relevant topics include the following:

Harvard Business Review
Organisation
Organisation Studies
Management Today,
Human Relations
Personnel Management
International Journal of Cross Cultural Management

PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT 🙂

Compelling correspondence is essential to the achievement all things considered but since of the changing idea of the present working environments, successful correspondence turns out to be more troublesome, and because of the numerous impediments that will permit beneficiaries to acknowledge the plan of the sender It is restricted. Misguided judgments.In spite of the fact that correspondence inside the association is rarely completely open, numerous straightforward arrangements can be executed to advance the effect of these hindrances.

Concerning specific contextual analysis, two significant correspondence standards, correspondence channel determination and commotion are self-evident. This course presents the standards of correspondence, the act of general correspondence, and different speculations to all the more likely comprehend the correspondence exchanges experienced in regular daily existence. The standards and practices that you learn in this course give the premise to additionally learning and correspondence.

This question has been answered

This course starts with an outline of the correspondence cycle, the method of reasoning and hypothesis. In resulting modules of the course, we will look at explicit use of relational connections in close to home and expert life. These incorporate relational correspondence, bunch correspondence and dynamic, authoritative correspondence in the work environment or relational correspondence. Rule of Business Communication In request to make correspondence viable, it is important to follow a few rules and standards. Seven of them are fundamental and applicable, and these are clear, finished, brief, obliging, right, thought to be, concrete. These standards are frequently called 7C for business correspondence. The subtleties of these correspondence standards are examined underneath: Politeness Principle: When conveying, we should build up a cordial relationship with every individual who sends data to us.

To be inviting and polite is indistinguishable, and politeness requires an insightful and amicable activity against others. Axioms are notable that gracious “pay of graciousness is the main thing to win everything”. Correspondence staff ought to consistently remember this. The accompanying standards may assist with improving courtesy:Preliminary considering correspondence with family All glad families have the mystery of progress. This achievement originates from a strong establishment of closeness and closeness. Indeed, through private correspondence these cozy family connections become all the more intently. Correspondence is the foundation of different affiliations, building solid partners of obedient devotion, improving family way of life, and assisting with accomplishing satisfaction (Gosche, p. 1). In any case, so as to keep up an amicable relationship, a few families experienced tumultuous encounters. Correspondence in the family is an intricate and alluring marvel. Correspondence between families isn’t restricted to single messages between families or verbal correspondence.

It is a unique cycle that oversees force, closeness and limits, cohesiveness and flexibility of route frameworks, and makes pictures, topics, stories, ceremonies, rules, jobs, making implications, making a feeling of family life An intelligent cycle that makes a model. This model has passed ages. Notwithstanding the view as a family and family automatic framework, one of the greatest exploration establishments in between family correspondence centers around a family correspondence model. Family correspondence model (FCP) hypothesis clarifies why families impart in their own specific manner dependent on one another ‘s psychological direction. Early FCP research established in media research is keen on how families handle broad communications data. Family correspondence was perceived as an exceptional scholastic exploration field by the National Communications Association in 1989. Family correspondence researchers were at first impacted by family research, social brain science, and relational hypothesis, before long built up the hypothesis and began research in a family framework zeroed in on a significant job. Until 2001, the primary issue of the Family Communication Research Journal, Family Communication Magazine, was given. Family correspondence is more than the field of correspondence analysts in the family. Examination on family correspondence is normally done by individuals in brain science, humanism, and family research, to give some examples models. However, as the popular family correspondence researcher Leslie Baxter stated, it is the focal point of this intelligent semantic creation measure making the grant of family correspondence special. In the field of in-home correspondence, correspondence is normally not founded on autonomous messages from one sender to one beneficiary, yet dependent on the dynamic interdependency of data shared among families It is conceptualized. The focal point of this methodology is on the shared trait of semantic development inside family frameworks. As such, producing doesn’t happen in vacuum, however it happens in a wide scope of ages and social exchange.

Standards are rules end up being followed when performing work to agree to a given objective. Hierarchical achievement relies significantly upon compelling correspondence. So as to successfully impart, it is important to follow a few standards and rules. Coming up next are rules to guarantee powerful correspondence: clearness: lucidity of data is a significant guideline of correspondence. For beneficiaries to know the message plainly, the messages ought to be sorted out in a basic language. To guarantee that beneficiaries can without much of a stretch comprehend the importance of the message, the sender needs to impart unmistakably and unhesitatingly so the beneficiary can plainly and unquestionably comprehend the data.>

Business and Management

Sample Answer

Our Services

Secure Checkout

Our Advantages