{br} STUCK with your assignment? {br} When is it due? {br} Get FREE assistance. Page Title: {title}{br} Page URL: {url}
UK: +44 748 007-0908, USA: +1 917 810-5386 [email protected]

AMN404 Readings in IMC/Assignment 2 – Literature table

Instructions:
You are required to produce a table of a selection of the key journal articles that you have now located that contribute to your chosen topic and help to address your statement of benefit identified in Assignment 1. No textbooks or conference papers.

No abstract, introduction, discussion or summary sections are required. However, you do need to re-state (or refine) your managerial / academic statement of benefit at the top of the table.  An example of the table format is attached, where you will see the key headings for each journal article – these are:
•    Author(s) and year of publication
•    Is the journal article: i) conceptual, ii) empirical (quantitative), iii) empirical (qualitative), iv) a case study, or v) an industry report
•    Research design (how was research conducted)
•    Research Focus/brief indication of key variables tested
•    Key findings or outcomes (in results section of paper)
•    Brief statement of how the article addresses your managerial / academic statement of benefit.

As a guideline you should allocate 25-40 words per journal article used in the table. Usually this table examines around 8 – 10 journal articles (which should extend your pre-reading from assignment 1), and ideally they should be key articles that really support the topic that you have selected to do. Use the example table provided, so that you can provide the necessary information in a suitable column format (landscape format).  Use single line spacing also so that you dont get masses of pages in the assignment.

Reference List (portrait format – can set up a separate attachment to the assignment): Provide a reference list of the articles cited in the table using Harvard or APA referencing. Use portrait format so that reference list is easy to read.

enclose a copy of the marking criteria with your assignment (do not staple it to your assignment).

Feedback procedure
The supervisor will provide feedback on the first assessment item for a clear direction of the final review.  The supervisor may provide verbal feedback and advice on the progress of the final review report for its improvement but will NOT make any correction on the draft report.

See additional information on next page regarding academic policy.

Academic Honesty
QUT expects students to act honestly in assessments. The issue of plagiarism or academic misconduct is taken seriously and students are reminded to ensure that assessments submitted represent their own work.

ensure that you sign the academic honesty statement on the Assignment Minder coversheet. For more information consult the QUT Academic Integrity Kit and QUT Library Resources for avoiding plagiarism.

Updated Late submission policy

Late submission policy; Assessment submitted after the due date without an approved extension will not be marked and will receive a grade of 1 or 0%.
If special circumstances prevent you from meeting the assessment due date, you can apply for an extension.
If you don’t have an approved extension you should submit the work you have completed by the due date and it will be marked against the assessment criteria.

AMN404 Readings in IMC – Example of literature table

Restate your managerial or academic statement of benefit here. (Particularly important if you did not get your statement sufficiently well developed in the proposal. Also helps marker to recall the area of your Literature review)
Author/s
(Year)*
Type of study (qual, quant, conceptual, case study)    Research Design    Research Focus and/or key variables tested /     Key Findings or outcomes
James, George and Smith (1988)

Quantitative
Telephone survey of health professionals and the four age cohorts of the public in United States (n = 750)

What drives organ donation. Commitment to, and attitudes about organ donation among five groups.
?    Commitment and attitudes are key drivers to donate.
?    Health professionals support organ donation more than public.
Put in a clear, brief statement about how this selected article contributes to addressing managerial or academic statement of benefit.
Tsai, Juno, Ekbin and Ellis
(1991)

Qualitative

In-depth interviews of Nurses in Kentucky, US (n=30).

How do nurses understand the need for organ donation and their attitudes to organ donation protocol.      * Knowledge of need for donations, knowledge of procedures for harvesting organs, religious beliefs, compassion were found to be important aspects that underpin favourable attitudes to organ donation.

Put in a clear, brief statement about how this selected article contributes to addressing managerial or academic statement of benefit.
Jones, deCosta and Richards (2011)    Conceptual    Review of marketing literature on perceived risk between 1995 and 2010    Primary focus on empirical studies that identify variables of use to marketing practitioners.    Review suggests that perceived risk can be categories as either objective or subjective by consumers, with specific concepts or constructs proving to be more relevant for each classification. A conceptual model for each classification is proposed and propositions offered for future research.
Put in a clear, brief statement about how this selected article contributes to addressing managerial or academic statement of benefit.
Agarwal (2013)    Case Study    Qualitative research with marketing managers in Chile (n=10)
Quantitative research on employees in Chilean Market Research companies. (N=220)    Etc etc     Etc etc
Put in a clear, brief statement about how this selected article contributes to addressing managerial or academic statement of benefit.
* These are hypothetical papers and offered as examples only.

AMN404 Readings in IMC                             Assessment 2 – Marking criteria

7    6    5    4    3    2-1
(100% – 85%)     (84% – 75%)     (74% – 65%)     (64% – 50%)         (46% – 24% -0%)

MARK (40)    40 – 34    33.5- 30    29.5 – 26    25.5 – 20        19 – 0

Scope of the literature in table    Evidence of an extended review of academic literature relevant to your managerial or academic statement of benefit, through inclusion of some key papers or major authors and contributions to the topic area.     You provide am extended and broad review of relevant academic literature, through inclusion of some key papers or major authors and contributions to the topic area.    While some key authors and contributions are included, the review does not demonstrate evidence of extended reading about issues on the topic.     While a few key authors and contributions are included, the review does not demonstrate evidence of extended reading on your selected topic. The focus of the literature may be either too broad or too narrow.        You fail to demonstrate a review of relevant literature. Or your literature does not extend our reading beyond the article provided in the proposal.
MARK (40)    40 – 34    33.5- 30    29.5 – 26    25.5 – 20        19 – 0

Demonstrated understanding
of key aspects of the article     Demonstrates very good understanding of the key aspects of the articles included in the table. Has a clear understanding of how the article addresses the managerial or academic statement of benefit    Demonstrates good understanding of the key aspects of the article required in the table. Has a good understanding of how the article addresses managerial or academic statement of benefit    Demonstrates satisfactory understanding of most of the key aspects of the article required in the table. Has some understanding of how the article addresses the managerial or academic statement of benefit     Demonstrates understanding of some of the key aspects of the article required in the table. Shows basic understanding of how the article addresses the managerial or academic statement of benefit        You fail to understand the key aspects of the article required in the table. Shows limited or no understanding of how the article addresses managerial or academic statement of benefit.
.
MARK (20)    20 – 17    16.5 – 15    14.5 – 13    12.5 – 10        9 – 0

Presentation and reference list    You organise content very clearly and make no grammar/spelling errors. Follows suggested format precisely. References and references list are in correct format. Word limit adhered to.    You organise content clearly and make few grammar or spelling errors. Follows suggested format. References and references list are in correct format.  Word limit adhered to.    You generally organise content well but make some grammatical or spelling errors. Suggested format is mostly followed References and references list mostly follow correct format. Word limit adhered to.    You organise content in a manner that may be difficult for the reader to follow at times. A number of grammar or spelling errors.  References and references list needs improvement to comply with correct format. Might be over the word limit         You present content in an incoherent way and make frequent grammar and or spelling errors throughout. Word limit might not be adhered to.
References and reference list are absent or very poorly done – does not demonstrate knowledge of correct referencing style.

Marks _____ / 100            Weighted mark  ____ / 20%                           Marker: ______________

Sample Answer

Compelling correspondence is essential to the achievement all things considered but since of the changing idea of the present working environments, successful correspondence turns out to be more troublesome, and because of the numerous impediments that will permit beneficiaries to acknowledge the plan of the sender It is restricted. Misguided judgments.In spite of the fact that correspondence inside the association is rarely completely open, numerous straightforward arrangements can be executed to advance the effect of these hindrances.

Concerning specific contextual analysis, two significant correspondence standards, correspondence channel determination and commotion are self-evident. This course presents the standards of correspondence, the act of general correspondence, and different speculations to all the more likely comprehend the correspondence exchanges experienced in regular daily existence. The standards and practices that you learn in this course give the premise to additionally learning and correspondence.

This course starts with an outline of the correspondence cycle, the method of reasoning and hypothesis. In resulting modules of the course, we will look at explicit use of relational connections in close to home and expert life. These incorporate relational correspondence, bunch correspondence and dynamic, authoritative correspondence in the work environment or relational correspondence. Rule of Business Communication In request to make correspondence viable, it is important to follow a few rules and standards. Seven of them are fundamental and applicable, and these are clear, finished, brief, obliging, right, thought to be, concrete. These standards are frequently called 7C for business correspondence. The subtleties of these correspondence standards are examined underneath: Politeness Principle: When conveying, we should build up a cordial relationship with every individual who sends data to us.

To be inviting and polite is indistinguishable, and politeness requires an insightful and amicable activity against others. Axioms are notable that gracious “pay of graciousness is the main thing to win everything”. Correspondence staff ought to consistently remember this. The accompanying standards may assist with improving courtesy:Preliminary considering correspondence with family All glad families have the mystery of progress. This achievement originates from a strong establishment of closeness and closeness. Indeed, through private correspondence these cozy family connections become all the more intently. Correspondence is the foundation of different affiliations, building solid partners of obedient devotion, improving family way of life, and assisting with accomplishing satisfaction (Gosche, p. 1). In any case, so as to keep up an amicable relationship, a few families experienced tumultuous encounters. Correspondence in the family is an intricate and alluring marvel. Correspondence between families isn’t restricted to single messages between families or verbal correspondence.

It is a unique cycle that oversees force, closeness and limits, cohesiveness and flexibility of route frameworks, and makes pictures, topics, stories, ceremonies, rules, jobs, making implications, making a feeling of family life An intelligent cycle that makes a model. This model has passed ages. Notwithstanding the view as a family and family automatic framework, one of the greatest exploration establishments in between family correspondence centers around a family correspondence model. Family correspondence model (FCP) hypothesis clarifies why families impart in their own specific manner dependent on one another ‘s psychological direction. Early FCP research established in media research is keen on how families handle broad communications data. Family correspondence was perceived as an exceptional scholastic exploration field by the National Communications Association in 1989. Family correspondence researchers were at first impacted by family research, social brain science, and relational hypothesis, before long built up the hypothesis and began research in a family framework zeroed in on a significant job. Until 2001, the primary issue of the Family Communication Research Journal, Family Communication Magazine, was given. Family correspondence is more than the field of correspondence analysts in the family. Examination on family correspondence is normally done by individuals in brain science, humanism, and family research, to give some examples models. However, as the popular family correspondence researcher Leslie Baxter stated, it is the focal point of this intelligent semantic creation measure making the grant of family correspondence special. In the field of in-home correspondence, correspondence is normally not founded on autonomous messages from one sender to one beneficiary, yet dependent on the dynamic interdependency of data shared among families It is conceptualized. The focal point of this methodology is on the shared trait of semantic development inside family frameworks. As such, producing doesn’t happen in vacuum, however it happens in a wide scope of ages and social exchange.

Standards are rules end up being followed when performing work to agree to a given objective. Hierarchical achievement relies significantly upon compelling correspondence. So as to successfully impart, it is important to follow a few standards and rules. Coming up next are rules to guarantee powerful correspondence: clearness: lucidity of data is a significant guideline of correspondence. For beneficiaries to know the message plainly, the messages ought to be sorted out in a basic language. To guarantee that beneficiaries can without much of a stretch comprehend the importance of the message, the sender needs to impart unmistakably and unhesitatingly so the beneficiary can plainly and unquestionably comprehend the data.>

Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!